Proposed experiment for detection of absolute motion
in [Relativity]
|
From: Autymn D. C. on 1 Aug 2010 09:27 On Jul 28, 5:19 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Jul 26, 4:17 am, "Autymn D. C." <lysde...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > Dear Aut...: If I missed an important reply of yours, I'm sorry. > Simply copy and paste it again. NE Don't write under my header, fuckwit, and go back in the thread and read it.
From: NoEinstein on 1 Aug 2010 19:47 On Aug 1, 9:21 am, "Autymn D. C." <lysde...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > Dear Autymn: Oh? A simple understanding of math should suffice to make one realize that E = mc^2 / (1 - v^2/c^2)^1/2 has only one variable, 'v', on the right side of the equation. When such variable increases LINEARLY, the "E" that results will increase exponentially to infinity at velocity 'c'. So the energy OUT is greatly exceeding the finite energy IN. That never happens in nature. Thus, SR has been conclusively disproved by yours truly. Get "another" hobby, Autymn. I fly with the Big Boys, and in First Class! NoEinstein > > On Jul 28, 5:25 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Jul 26, 4:34 am, "Autymn D. C." <lysde...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > > Dear Aut: The Law of the Conservation of Energy was around long before > > Einstein... BREACHED logic. Ha, ha, HA! NE > > You fuckwit, don't post under my header. Einstein did not breach CoE > anywhere.
From: NoEinstein on 1 Aug 2010 19:54 On Aug 1, 9:27 am, "Autymn D. C." <lysde...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > On Jul 28, 5:19 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Jul 26, 4:17 am, "Autymn D. C." <lysde...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > > Dear Aut...: If I missed an important reply of yours, I'm sorry. > > Simply copy and paste it again. NE > > Don't write under my header, fuckwit, and go back in the thread and > read it. Dear Autymn: You don't have the smarts to be making a '+new post'. Sorry if I offend your non-intellect. NoEinstein
From: Bob Myers on 1 Aug 2010 20:44 NoEinstein wrote: > On Aug 1, 9:21 am, "Autymn D. C." <lysde...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> > Dear Autymn: Oh? A simple understanding of math should suffice to > make one realize that E = mc^2 / (1 - v^2/c^2)^1/2 has only one > variable, 'v', on the right side of the equation. What, exactly, do you think "m" is? Bob M.
From: Autymn D. C. on 2 Aug 2010 05:04
On Aug 1, 4:54 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Aug 1, 9:27 am, "Autymn D. C." <lysde...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > > On Jul 28, 5:19 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > On Jul 26, 4:17 am, "Autymn D. C." <lysde...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > > > Dear Aut...: If I missed an important reply of yours, I'm sorry. > > > Simply copy and paste it again. NE > > > Don't write under my header, fuckwit, and go back in the thread and > > read it. > > Dear Autymn: You don't have the smarts to be making a '+new post'. > Sorry if I offend your non-intellect. NoEinstein I made a new post not long ago, and earlier this year. Stop thwartin the thread, shyster cretin. All of your arguments are nothing. -Aut |