Proposed experiment for detection of absolute motion
in [Physics]
|
Prev: HMLS Theory of Gravitation? (was Discrete Scale Relativity...)
Next: asteroid visited by a "satellite"
From: Dono. on 13 Jul 2010 14:25 On Jul 13, 10:33 am, Surfer <n...(a)spam.net> wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 07:23:45 -0700 (PDT), GSS > > > > <gurcharn_san...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > >As per SR (if the second postulate is true), this to and fro flight > >time difference |T_ab-T_ba| must be of the order of zero (or a random > >scatter of values within +/- 5 nanoseconds). On the other hand, if the > >second postulate is not true, then the maximum difference in the to > >and fro flight times, |T_ab-T_ba| is expected to be in the range of > >about 200 nanoseconds.] > > >For a moment, let me agree with you that both SR and GR are perfectly > >valid and well tested theories. Kindly apply your knowledge of SR and > >GR and predict the result of the above experiment in terms of the > >maximum difference in the to and fro flight times, |T_ab-T_ba| > >expected under Relativity. Thereafter, the result of the experiment > >will clinch the issue whether Relativity theories are valid or not. > > I think you should have a close read of: > > Combining NASA/JPL One-Way Optical-Fiber Light-Speed Data with > Spacecraft Earth-Flyby Doppler-Shift Data to Characterise 3-Space Flow > Progress in Physics, 4, 50-64, 2009.http://www.ptep-online.com/index_files/2009/PP-19-05.PDF > > This shows that the validity of SR depends on circumstances. > No, it simply shows that both your idol (Cahill) and you are totally ignorant of SR.
From: NoEinstein on 13 Jul 2010 23:18 On Jul 12, 6:38 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Dear PD, the Dunce: If you... elementary school teachers know so much, why aren't you making '+new posts' to explain what you've contributed? Because you all know nothing nor have you contributed anything! NE > > On Jul 12, 4:53 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Jul 12, 4:16 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Dear PD the DUNCE School Teacher: Read some of the following links to > > see how clearly I've documented what I've done. > > I've looked them over and can find no adequate documentation of your > $2,000 interferometer. > Are you sure you made one, or did you just make that up too? > > > Oh... Have you > > replicated that $40.00 dropped ball experiment? That color photo I > > sent you is all the documentation needed to disprove Coriolis and > > Einstein, etc. NE > > You know, if you put up a "color photo" of your apparatus at a 4th > grade science fair and called it your experimental description, you > wouldn't get even a C for it. > > > > > > > Where Angels Fear to Fallhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/8152ef3e... > > Last Nails in Einstein's Coffinhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_frm/thre... > > Pop Quiz for Science Buffs!http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/43f6f316... > > An Einstein Disproof for Dummieshttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/f7a63... > > Another look at Einsteinhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/41670721... > > Three Problems for Math and Sciencehttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/bb07f... > > Matter from Thin Airhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/ee4fe... > > Curing Einsteins Diseasehttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/4ff9e... > > Replicating NoEinsteins Invalidation of M-M (at sci.math)http://groups.google.com/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/d9f98526... > > Cleaning Away Einsteins Mishmashhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/5d847... > > Dropping Einstein Like a Stonehttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/989e1... > > Plotting the Curves of Coriolis, Einstein, and NoEinstein (is > > Copyrighted.)http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/713f8... > > Are Jews Destroying Objectivity in Science?http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/d4cbe... > > The Gravity of Masses Doesnt Bend Light.http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/efb99... > > KE = 1/2mv^2 is disproved in new falling object impact test.http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/51a85... > > Light rays dont travel on ballistic curves.http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/c3d7a... > > A BLACK HOLE MYTH GETS BUSTED:http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/a1702... > > SR Ignored the Significance of the = Signhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/56247... > > Eleaticus confirms that SR has been destroyed!http://groups.google.com/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/c3cdedf3... > > NoEinstein Finds Yet Another Reason Why SR Bites-the-Dust!http://groups..google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/a3a12... > > NoEinstein Gives the History & Rationale for Disproving Einsteinhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/81046... > > There is no "pull" of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/a8c26... > > PD has questions about science. Can any of you help?http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/4a2ed... > > Taking a Fresh Look at the Physics of Radiometers.http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/3ebe8... > > A Proposed Gravity-Propelled Swing Experiment.http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/3052e... > > Shedding New Light on Comet Tailshttp://groups.google.com/g/d8e7fef4/t/fbb6a213b8c465b3/.../187797453b...... > > What is sci.research seeking if not the truth?http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/d3082... > > > > On Jul 12, 9:23 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > On Jul 11, 1:59 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Dear Sam: Mine was (is) a $2,000.00 experiment intended to answer the > > > > 'yes or no' question: Can Earth's velocity and direction be determined > > > > via an Earth mounted experiment? > > > > Is the experiment documented? Where? > > > > > The answer is a resounding YES! But > > > > a new generation of experiment, costing a great deal more, will be > > > > needed to give the absolute numbers. I can envision having dozens of > > > > such interferometers functioning in unison to determine absolute speed > > > > so accurately, that it can be proven that the Universe is NOT > > > > expanding from the BB. NoEinstein > > > > > > On 7/11/10 12:07 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > > > Dear GSS: I have already detected Earth's absolute speed and > > > > > > direction using my first-generation X, Y, and Z interferometer. > > > > > > What's the speed?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
From: NoEinstein on 13 Jul 2010 23:21 On Jul 12, 7:55 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Sam: You can generalize yourself to HELL, but you can't state a single point of my New Science which you can successfully counter. Science isn't about the last man standing. It's about the man who is RIGHT! NE > > On 7/12/10 4:46 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > On Jul 12, 1:24 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 7/12/10 8:57 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > > >>> Sam: You don't understand the real world well enough to dictate to > >>> anyone. > > >> Nature does the dictating stooopid. She shows you wrong every time. > > > Dear Sam: Again, you only attack the messenger. Please state ONE > > instance in which my New Science is wrong, and paraphrase your counter- > > argument. You've never been able to do that. So, it's YOU who flunk > > the course! NoEinstein > > You don't control the agenda--Nature does the dictating. She shows > you wrong every time.
From: NoEinstein on 13 Jul 2010 23:29 On Jul 12, 10:33 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Sam: Look in the record: You have never paraphrased a single counter-argument to any portion of my New Science. I, nor any of the many readers, wont be going on one your wild-goose-chases. The record is clear: I've made a greater contribution to physics than all of the previous physicists combined! NE > > On 7/12/10 9:28 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > Dear Sam: Again, you only attack the messenger. Please state ONE > > instance in which my New Science is wrong, and paraphrase your counter- > > argument. You've never been able to do that. So, it's YOU who flunk > > the course! NoEinstein > > Look in the posting records... I have shown you to be wrong many > times. Look in the posting record. The arguments are all there. > You can't fool mother nature.
From: NoEinstein on 13 Jul 2010 23:34
On Jul 13, 2:50 am, "Painius" <starswirlern...(a)maol.com> wrote: > Dear Painus: Access to linkssome close to three years oldis Google's problem, not mine. I have copies of any post you would like to see. I'll send you a copy. But I won't make New Posts on the same subjects, because Google might fix the problem. NoEinstein > > "NoEinstein" <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote in message... > > news:d3de87b5-ee17-4e3b-aa3d-de9866ae8d75(a)x21g2000yqa.googlegroups.com... > On Jul 12, 4:16 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Dear PD the DUNCE School Teacher: Read some of the following links to > see how clearly I've documented what I've done. Oh... Have you > replicated that $40.00 dropped ball experiment? That color photo I > sent you is all the documentation needed to disprove Coriolis and > Einstein, etc. NE > > Where Angels Fear to Fallhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/8152ef3e... > Last Nails in Einstein's Coffinhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics..relativity/browse_frm/thre... > Pop Quiz for Science Buffs!http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/43f6f316... > An Einstein Disproof for Dummieshttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/f7a63... > Another look at Einsteinhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/41670721... > > P I T A P I T A P I T A P I T A P I T A P I T A P I T A > > These links don't work, so since these sounded like the most > interesting topics, i didn't bother reading any of the others. Your > providing bad links doesn't really say much for your argument, > does it? I could be wrong. > > happy days and... > starry starry nights! > > -- > Indelibly yours, > Paine Ellsworth > > P.S. "What you do makes a difference, and you only need > to decide what kind of difference you want to make." > > Jane Goodall > > P.P.S.: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Paine_Ellsworth |