Proposed experiment for detection of absolute motion
in [Physics]
|
Prev: HMLS Theory of Gravitation? (was Discrete Scale Relativity...)
Next: asteroid visited by a "satellite"
From: BURT on 13 Jul 2010 23:38 On Jul 13, 8:18 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Jul 12, 6:38 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear PD, the Dunce: If you... elementary school teachers know so > much, why aren't you making '+new posts' to explain what you've > contributed? Because you all know nothing nor have you contributed > anything! NE > > > > > > > On Jul 12, 4:53 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > On Jul 12, 4:16 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Dear PD the DUNCE School Teacher: Read some of the following links to > > > see how clearly I've documented what I've done. > > > I've looked them over and can find no adequate documentation of your > > $2,000 interferometer. > > Are you sure you made one, or did you just make that up too? > > > > Oh... Have you > > > replicated that $40.00 dropped ball experiment? That color photo I > > > sent you is all the documentation needed to disprove Coriolis and > > > Einstein, etc. NE > > > You know, if you put up a "color photo" of your apparatus at a 4th > > grade science fair and called it your experimental description, you > > wouldn't get even a C for it. > > > > Where Angels Fear to Fallhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/8152ef3e... > > > Last Nails in Einstein's Coffinhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_frm/thre... > > > Pop Quiz for Science Buffs!http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/43f6f316... > > > An Einstein Disproof for Dummieshttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/f7a63... > > > Another look at Einsteinhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/41670721... > > > Three Problems for Math and Sciencehttp://groups.google.com/group/sci..physics/browse_thread/thread/bb07f... > > > Matter from Thin Airhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/ee4fe... > > > Curing Einsteins Diseasehttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/4ff9e... > > > Replicating NoEinsteins Invalidation of M-M (at sci.math)http://groups.google.com/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/d9f98526... > > > Cleaning Away Einsteins Mishmashhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci..physics/browse_thread/thread/5d847... > > > Dropping Einstein Like a Stonehttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/989e1... > > > Plotting the Curves of Coriolis, Einstein, and NoEinstein (is > > > Copyrighted.)http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/713f8... > > > Are Jews Destroying Objectivity in Science?http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/d4cbe... > > > The Gravity of Masses Doesnt Bend Light.http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/efb99... > > > KE = 1/2mv^2 is disproved in new falling object impact test.http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/51a85... > > > Light rays dont travel on ballistic curves.http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/c3d7a... > > > A BLACK HOLE MYTH GETS BUSTED:http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/a1702... > > > SR Ignored the Significance of the = Signhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/56247... > > > Eleaticus confirms that SR has been destroyed!http://groups.google.com/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/c3cdedf3... > > > NoEinstein Finds Yet Another Reason Why SR Bites-the-Dust!http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/a3a12... > > > NoEinstein Gives the History & Rationale for Disproving Einsteinhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/81046... > > > There is no "pull" of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/a8c26... > > > PD has questions about science. Can any of you help?http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/4a2ed... > > > Taking a Fresh Look at the Physics of Radiometers.http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/3ebe8... > > > A Proposed Gravity-Propelled Swing Experiment.http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/3052e... > > > Shedding New Light on Comet Tailshttp://groups.google.com/g/d8e7fef4/t/fbb6a213b8c465b3/.../187797453b...... > > > What is sci.research seeking if not the truth?http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/d3082... > > > > > On Jul 12, 9:23 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > On Jul 11, 1:59 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Sam: Mine was (is) a $2,000.00 experiment intended to answer the > > > > > 'yes or no' question: Can Earth's velocity and direction be determined > > > > > via an Earth mounted experiment? > > > > > Is the experiment documented? Where? > > > > > > The answer is a resounding YES! But > > > > > a new generation of experiment, costing a great deal more, will be > > > > > needed to give the absolute numbers. I can envision having dozens of > > > > > such interferometers functioning in unison to determine absolute speed > > > > > so accurately, that it can be proven that the Universe is NOT > > > > > expanding from the BB. NoEinstein > > > > > > > On 7/11/10 12:07 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear GSS: I have already detected Earth's absolute speed and > > > > > > > direction using my first-generation X, Y, and Z interferometer. > > > > > > > What's the speed?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Speed is created by acceleration. Change in speed is always detectable by weightedness of flowing energy in the other direction. Motion is detectable at its onset due to weight. Mitch Raemsch
From: NoEinstein on 14 Jul 2010 01:04 On Jul 13, 10:23 am, GSS <gurcharn_san...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Dear GSS: Clocks can indeed be synchronized to show identical time settings at a common point on the Earth. When you say: to and fro, Ill assume you mean back and forth, as with mirrors. Note: There is no switching means known to man that can measure light speed, one-way, over Earth based distances. Your separation distance of 50 Km needs to be more like to the moon, or further, to be even close to being measurable one way. A. A. Michelson made a very precise measurement of the velocity of light in air with his 22 mile long Mt. Wilson experiment. The back and forth path length was 44 miles. He timed the emission-to-receipt times by reflecting the light from a precisely spinning octagonal mirror. By carefully adjusting the rotational speed of the mirror, he could cause the beam of light to interfere with a split off copy of the same beam. He could then determine that the high speed spinning mirror had rotated 1/8 revolution in the time it took for the light to travel 44 miles. The effects of Earths velocity were averaged out, because the light traveled back and forth. If you do any light velocity experiment over a 24 hour period, half of the data will show the velocity increased by the rotational velocity of the Earth, and the other half will show the light velocity decreased that same amount. But since the length of your light course is too short, you would have to use multiple reflections over that 50 Km in order to be able to time the light at all. Effectively, any back and forth recording of the time will have the velocity of the Earth averaged out, just like at Mt. Wilson. Having a clock or clocks measuring the time would be less accurate than Michelsons rotating mirrors. The simplest and most direct way to measure Earths velocity in the Cosmos, is by using my X, Y, and Z interferometer. The light shining along the Z axis strikes a normal 60T 40R beam splitter, and returns to a normal paper target glued to the front of the laser. That means that such light course is unaffected by the velocity of the Earth. Though the beam translates parallel to its earlier location(s), the distance between the beam splitter and the paper target doesnt chance because both of those are perfectly parallel. The latter light course becomes the unchanging CONTROL that the M-M experiment lacked. The Test light course travels 36 from the back mirror of the laser, through the beam splitter to hit a 45 degree mirror (bends the light 90 degrees). From there the reflected light travels 12 to a first surface, parallel mirror that sends the same test beam headed back toward the target thats glued to the front of the laser (with a precision pin hole to let the laser light pass.) The aspect of my interferometer which detects the velocity in the Cosmos is this: The test light, in traveling the 36 to the 45 degree mirror isnt anchored to the apparatus. Since the Earth will move by various amounts while the light travels the nominal 36, the actual length of the light course will increase or decrease depending on how much OFF CENTER the light hits the 45 degree mirror. The faster the velocity of the Earth, the further off center the beam will hit, and the greater (or less) the TIME of travel to the target will be. When one light course changes its times of travel and the other one doesnt, you get these nice advancing or retarding interference rings. So, GSS, rather than dreaming up clocks with cant be switched to indicate when the light arrived, just accept that my New Science already has most of the answers. More sophisticated interferometers should be able to measure (not merely detect) Earths velocity and direction in the Cosmos. NoEinstein > > On Jul 12, 1:41 pm, "n...(a)bid.nes" <alien8...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Jul 12, 12:23 am, GSS <gurcharn_san...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> On Jul 12, 9:56 am, "n...(a)bid.nes" <alien8...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> ... > >>> "Absolute" velocity, as usually used, is the alleged velocity of an > >>> object with respect to the entire universe; but if such exists, > >>> there's no clear way to measure it. > > >>> Mark L. Fergerson > > >> It is precisely this "absolute velocity" of the earth which is going > >> to be measured with the proposed experiment. If you study the paper, > >> you will definitely find a very clear description of a simple way to > >> measure it. > >> Phys. Essays 23, 442 (2010)http://physicsessays.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal... > > > Yeah, I know. The external reference it proposes to use is the > > center of mass of the universe, but the existence of such is > > predicated on the assumption that GR is false. > > > Mark L. Fergerson > > Well, instead of arguing about our different viewpoints regarding the > existence of 'center of mass of the universe', 'absolute reference > frame' and the 'isotropy of speed of light in only the absolute > reference frame', let us clinch the issue with the result of the > proposed experiment. > > [In brief, the proposed experiment involves measurement of to and fro > light propagation times between two fixed points on earth. Let us > consider two points A and B fixed on the surface of earth (at equal > gravitational potential) and aligned along east-west direction. Let > the separation distance AB be about 30 to 50 km. Position two > identical precision atomic clocks mid-way between A and B and mutually > synchronize them in close-by position. After synchronizing, shift the > two clocks to stations A and B by slow transport. Now as part of the > experiment, send a light pulse from A to B and record its time of > flight with the two clocks at A and B. Let this measured time of > flight be T_ab. Then send another light pulse from B to A and record > its time of flight with the two clocks. Let this measured time of > flight be T_ba. Repeat these to and fro time of flight measurements > for a period of 24 hours. Find the maximum difference in the to and > fro flight times, |T_ab-T_ba| over the test period. > > As per SR (if the second postulate is true), this to and fro flight > time difference |T_ab-T_ba| must be of the order of zero (or a random > scatter of values within +/- 5 nanoseconds). On the other hand, if the > second postulate is not true, then the maximum difference in the to > and fro flight times, |T_ab-T_ba| is expected to be in the range of > about 200 nanoseconds.] > > For a moment, let me agree with you that both SR and GR are perfectly > valid and well tested theories. Kindly apply your knowledge of SR and > GR and predict the result of the above experiment in terms of the > maximum difference in the to and fro flight times, |T_ab-T_ba| > expected under Relativity. Thereafter, the result of the experiment > will clinch the issue whether Relativity theories are valid or not. > > Isn't it fair enough. > > GSS- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
From: NoEinstein on 14 Jul 2010 01:08 On Jul 13, 12:08 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Dear PD, the Dunce School Teacher: You and Sam were met for each other. Neither of you have ever paraphrased a single disproof of ant of my many points of science. You two are like turkeys running around on just one leg, while feeding your face with the other leg. NE > > On Jul 12, 9:33 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 7/12/10 9:28 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > Dear Sam: Again, you only attack the messenger. Please state ONE > > > instance in which my New Science is wrong, and paraphrase your counter- > > > argument. You've never been able to do that. So, it's YOU who flunk > > > the course! NoEinstein > > > Look in the posting records... I have shown you to be wrong many > > times. Look in the posting record. The arguments are all there. > > You can't fool mother nature. > > Oh, but Sam, for NoEinstein, you've not shown anything unless you've > gotten him to acknowledge it! And this he simply refuses to do. Of > course, so would a turkey leg. But for NoEinstein, "victory" is > paramount, and this he counts as a "victory". By the same measure, of > course, a turkey leg is just as victorious. > > PD
From: NoEinstein on 14 Jul 2010 01:10 On Jul 13, 12:09 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 12, 9:26 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jul 12, 6:38 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jul 12, 4:53 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > On Jul 12, 4:16 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Dear PD the DUNCE School Teacher: Read some of the following links to > > > > see how clearly I've documented what I've done. > > > > I've looked them over and can find no adequate documentation of your > > > $2,000 interferometer. > > > Are you sure you made one, or did you just make that up too? > > > > > Oh... Have you > > > > replicated that $40.00 dropped ball experiment? That color photo I > > > > sent you is all the documentation needed to disprove Coriolis and > > > > Einstein, etc. NE > > > > You know, if you put up a "color photo" of your apparatus at a 4th > > > grade science fair and called it your experimental description, you > > > wouldn't get even a C for it. > > > > > Where Angels Fear to Fallhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/8152ef3e... > > > > Last Nails in Einstein's Coffinhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_frm/thre... > > > > Pop Quiz for Science Buffs!http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/43f6f316... > > > > An Einstein Disproof for Dummieshttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/f7a63... > > > > Another look at Einsteinhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/41670721... > > > > Three Problems for Math and Sciencehttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/bb07f... > > > > Matter from Thin Airhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/ee4fe... > > > > Curing Einsteins Diseasehttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/4ff9e... > > > > Replicating NoEinsteins Invalidation of M-M (at sci.math)http://groups.google.com/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/d9f98526... > > > > Cleaning Away Einsteins Mishmashhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/5d847... > > > > Dropping Einstein Like a Stonehttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/989e1... > > > > Plotting the Curves of Coriolis, Einstein, and NoEinstein (is > > > > Copyrighted.)http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/713f8... > > > > Are Jews Destroying Objectivity in Science?http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/d4cbe... > > > > The Gravity of Masses Doesnt Bend Light.http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/efb99... > > > > KE = 1/2mv^2 is disproved in new falling object impact test.http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/51a85... > > > > Light rays dont travel on ballistic curves.http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/c3d7a... > > > > A BLACK HOLE MYTH GETS BUSTED:http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/a1702... > > > > SR Ignored the Significance of the = Signhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/56247... > > > > Eleaticus confirms that SR has been destroyed!http://groups.google.com/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/c3cdedf3... > > > > NoEinstein Finds Yet Another Reason Why SR Bites-the-Dust!http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/a3a12... > > > > NoEinstein Gives the History & Rationale for Disproving Einsteinhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/81046... > > > > There is no "pull" of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/a8c26... > > > > PD has questions about science. Can any of you help?http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/4a2ed... > > > > Taking a Fresh Look at the Physics of Radiometers.http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/3ebe8... > > > > A Proposed Gravity-Propelled Swing Experiment.http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/3052e... > > > > Shedding New Light on Comet Tailshttp://groups.google.com/g/d8e7fef4/t/fbb6a213b8c465b3/.../187797453b...... > > > > What is sci.research seeking if not the truth?http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/d3082... > > > > > > On Jul 12, 9:23 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jul 11, 1:59 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Dear Sam: Mine was (is) a $2,000.00 experiment intended to answer the > > > > > > 'yes or no' question: Can Earth's velocity and direction be determined > > > > > > via an Earth mounted experiment? > > > > > > Is the experiment documented? Where? > > > > > > > The answer is a resounding YES! But > > > > > > a new generation of experiment, costing a great deal more, will be > > > > > > needed to give the absolute numbers. I can envision having dozens of > > > > > > such interferometers functioning in unison to determine absolute speed > > > > > > so accurately, that it can be proven that the Universe is NOT > > > > > > expanding from the BB. NoEinstein > > > > > > > > On 7/11/10 12:07 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear GSS: I have already detected Earth's absolute speed and > > > > > > > > direction using my first-generation X, Y, and Z interferometer. > > > > > > > > What's the speed?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > Maybe you are right, PD. But fourth grade school teachers know no > > more about physics than that 'speck' at the bottom the Science Hill > > that I am the King of. NE - > > There's a little bit of foam on the corner of your mouth, there. > > No, the other side. > > PD- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - PD... You don't want to get me 'mad' I might bite you! NE
From: NoEinstein on 14 Jul 2010 01:17
On Jul 13, 11:38 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Dear Burt: I'll give you an 85! Indeed, there must be an acceleration, however small, before reaching any fixed speed. If the speed changes, there IS a force (front or back) to show that the speed change has occurred. And... if motion occurs (acceleration) there will be a mass proportional force, because of the object's inertia pushing of the enclosure. NoEinstein > > On Jul 13, 8:18 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jul 12, 6:38 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Dear PD, the Dunce: If you... elementary school teachers know so > > much, why aren't you making '+new posts' to explain what you've > > contributed? Because you all know nothing nor have you contributed > > anything! NE > > > > On Jul 12, 4:53 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > On Jul 12, 4:16 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Dear PD the DUNCE School Teacher: Read some of the following links to > > > > see how clearly I've documented what I've done. > > > > I've looked them over and can find no adequate documentation of your > > > $2,000 interferometer. > > > Are you sure you made one, or did you just make that up too? > > > > > Oh... Have you > > > > replicated that $40.00 dropped ball experiment? That color photo I > > > > sent you is all the documentation needed to disprove Coriolis and > > > > Einstein, etc. NE > > > > You know, if you put up a "color photo" of your apparatus at a 4th > > > grade science fair and called it your experimental description, you > > > wouldn't get even a C for it. > > > > > Where Angels Fear to Fallhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/8152ef3e... > > > > Last Nails in Einstein's Coffinhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_frm/thre... > > > > Pop Quiz for Science Buffs!http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/43f6f316... > > > > An Einstein Disproof for Dummieshttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/f7a63... > > > > Another look at Einsteinhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/41670721... > > > > Three Problems for Math and Sciencehttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/bb07f... > > > > Matter from Thin Airhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/ee4fe... > > > > Curing Einsteins Diseasehttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/4ff9e... > > > > Replicating NoEinsteins Invalidation of M-M (at sci.math)http://groups.google.com/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/d9f98526... > > > > Cleaning Away Einsteins Mishmashhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/5d847... > > > > Dropping Einstein Like a Stonehttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/989e1... > > > > Plotting the Curves of Coriolis, Einstein, and NoEinstein (is > > > > Copyrighted.)http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/713f8... > > > > Are Jews Destroying Objectivity in Science?http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/d4cbe... > > > > The Gravity of Masses Doesnt Bend Light.http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/efb99... > > > > KE = 1/2mv^2 is disproved in new falling object impact test.http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/51a85... > > > > Light rays dont travel on ballistic curves.http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/c3d7a... > > > > A BLACK HOLE MYTH GETS BUSTED:http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/a1702... > > > > SR Ignored the Significance of the = Signhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/56247... > > > > Eleaticus confirms that SR has been destroyed!http://groups.google.com/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/c3cdedf3... > > > > NoEinstein Finds Yet Another Reason Why SR Bites-the-Dust!http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/a3a12... > > > > NoEinstein Gives the History & Rationale for Disproving Einsteinhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/81046... > > > > There is no "pull" of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/a8c26... > > > > PD has questions about science. Can any of you help?http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/4a2ed... > > > > Taking a Fresh Look at the Physics of Radiometers.http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/3ebe8... > > > > A Proposed Gravity-Propelled Swing Experiment.http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/3052e... > > > > Shedding New Light on Comet Tailshttp://groups.google.com/g/d8e7fef4/t/fbb6a213b8c465b3/.../187797453b...... > > > > What is sci.research seeking if not the truth?http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/d3082... > > > > > > On Jul 12, 9:23 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jul 11, 1:59 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Dear Sam: Mine was (is) a $2,000.00 experiment intended to answer the > > > > > > 'yes or no' question: Can Earth's velocity and direction be determined > > > > > > via an Earth mounted experiment? > > > > > > Is the experiment documented? Where? > > > > > > > The answer is a resounding YES! But > > > > > > a new generation of experiment, costing a great deal more, will be > > > > > > needed to give the absolute numbers. I can envision having dozens of > > > > > > such interferometers functioning in unison to determine absolute speed > > > > > > so accurately, that it can be proven that the Universe is NOT > > > > > > expanding from the BB. NoEinstein > > > > > > > > On 7/11/10 12:07 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear GSS: I have already detected Earth's absolute speed and > > > > > > > > direction using my first-generation X, Y, and Z interferometer. > > > > > > > > What's the speed?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Speed is created by acceleration. Change in speed is always detectable > by weightedness of flowing energy in the other direction. > > Motion is detectable at its onset due to weight. > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - |