Prev: Experiment: Additive Creation; Dirac's new radioactivities Chapt 5 #172; ATOM TOTALITY
Next: God is not happy
From: BURT on 17 Jun 2010 17:57 On Jun 17, 2:28 pm, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > On Jun 17, 4:07 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 17, 1:02 pm, Uncle Al <Uncle...(a)hate.spam.net> wrote: > > > > BURT wrote: > > > > > How can you be sure range is infinite if the forces are so small that > > > > they are not even immeasurable? > > > > 1) Already an idiot > > > 2) Galactic superclusters. > > > 3) idiot > > > > > How will science verify unlimited range then? Where is its evidence? > > > > Theory suggests that they are limited in time and space. > > > > 1) Hubble constant. > > > 2) idiot > > > > > Mitch Reamsch > > > > The idiot misspelled his own name. > > > > idiot > > > -- > > > Uncle Alhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ > > > (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm > > > There is no proof until there is measurement. But it is obvious that > > strong and electric are limited to the atom. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > There is no notion of proof in science at all, dim bulb.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Well if science is about fact then since we can't measure force drop off science cannot claim to eliminate it as a fact. Mitch Raemsch
From: Ray Vickson on 17 Jun 2010 21:39 On Jun 17, 1:22 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > On 6/17/2010 3:07 PM, BURT wrote: > > > There is no proof until there is measurement. But it is obvious that > > strong and electric are limited to the atom. Nonsense. Haven't you ever seen a comb pick up a piece of paper after it (the comb) has been rubbed in hair? Is a comb bigger than an atom? Have you ever seen an electromagnet pick up a car in a junkyard? Is a car bigger than an atom? R.G. Vickson > > > Mitch Raemsch > > We have sufficient proof to know with absolute certainty that > you are an idiot.
From: DougC on 18 Jun 2010 00:17 BURT wrote: > How can you be sure range is infinite > How will science verify unlimited range then? Nothing is infinite. Nothing is unlimited. Doug Chandler
From: BURT on 18 Jun 2010 00:19 On Jun 17, 9:17 pm, DougC <priga...(a)aol.com> wrote: > BURT wrote: > > How can you be sure range is infinite > > How will science verify unlimited range then? > > Nothing is infinite. Nothing is unlimited. > > Doug Chandler My point is that we can't measure that. A limited range is obvious from the atomic energy forces. They are forces for the atom. Mitch Raemsch
From: GogoJF on 18 Jun 2010 00:23 On Jun 17, 2:13 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > How can you be sure range is infinite if the forces are so small that > they are not even immeasurable? > > How will science verify unlimited range then? Where is its evidence? > Theory suggests that they are limited in time and space. > > Mitch Reamsch the physics of a single eye can extend through out the galaxies
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: Experiment: Additive Creation; Dirac's new radioactivities Chapt 5 #172; ATOM TOTALITY Next: God is not happy |