Prev: Experiment: Additive Creation; Dirac's new radioactivities Chapt 5 #172; ATOM TOTALITY
Next: God is not happy
From: BURT on 18 Jun 2010 01:13
On Jun 17, 10:06 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jun 18, 12:04 am, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jun 18, 12:01 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 17, 9:39 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jun 17, 11:33 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Jun 17, 9:23 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Jun 17, 2:13 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > How can you be sure range is infinite if the forces are so small that
> > > > > > > they are not even immeasurable?
>
> > > > > > > How will science verify unlimited range then? Where is its evidence?
> > > > > > > Theory suggests that they are limited in time and space.
>
> > > > > > > Mitch Reamsch
>
> > > > > > the physics of a single eye can extend through out the galaxies
>
> > > > > No. We can't see that far with the naked eye!
>
> > > > No, but through the ages the naked eye will be aided!
>
> > > I think the future of astronomy looks great. I am looking forward to
> > > what replaces the Hubble Space Telescope in 2017.
>
> > > Mitch Raemsch
>
> > Exactly.
>
> We have always- to be looking forward- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Isn't time always going forward even in math. I choose to go forward
with it!


Mitch Raemsch
From: GogoJF on 18 Jun 2010 01:15
On Jun 18, 12:13 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jun 17, 10:06 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 18, 12:04 am, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 18, 12:01 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jun 17, 9:39 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Jun 17, 11:33 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Jun 17, 9:23 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Jun 17, 2:13 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > How can you be sure range is infinite if the forces are so small that
> > > > > > > > they are not even immeasurable?
>
> > > > > > > > How will science verify unlimited range then? Where is its evidence?
> > > > > > > > Theory suggests that they are limited in time and space.
>
> > > > > > > > Mitch Reamsch
>
> > > > > > > the physics of a single eye can extend through out the galaxies
>
> > > > > > No. We can't see that far with the naked eye!
>
> > > > > No, but through the ages the naked eye will be aided!
>
> > > > I think the future of astronomy looks great. I am looking forward to
> > > > what replaces the Hubble Space Telescope in 2017.
>
> > > > Mitch Raemsch
>
> > > Exactly.
>
> > We have always- to be looking forward- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Isn't time always going forward even in math. I choose to go forward
> with it!
>
> Mitch Raemsch

Well, my friend, you have no idea.
From: BURT on 18 Jun 2010 01:18
On Jun 17, 10:15 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jun 18, 12:13 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jun 17, 10:06 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 18, 12:04 am, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jun 18, 12:01 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Jun 17, 9:39 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Jun 17, 11:33 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Jun 17, 9:23 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > On Jun 17, 2:13 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > How can you be sure range is infinite if the forces are so small that
> > > > > > > > > they are not even immeasurable?
>
> > > > > > > > > How will science verify unlimited range then? Where is its evidence?
> > > > > > > > > Theory suggests that they are limited in time and space.
>
> > > > > > > > > Mitch Reamsch
>
> > > > > > > > the physics of a single eye can extend through out the galaxies
>
> > > > > > > No. We can't see that far with the naked eye!
>
> > > > > > No, but through the ages the naked eye will be aided!
>
> > > > > I think the future of astronomy looks great. I am looking forward to
> > > > > what replaces the Hubble Space Telescope in 2017.
>
> > > > > Mitch Raemsch
>
> > > > Exactly.
>
> > > We have always- to be looking forward- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > Isn't time always going forward even in math. I choose to go forward
> > with it!
>
> > Mitch Raemsch
>
> Well, my friend, you have no idea.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I have more than an idea of time I have a concept. It is Two Times.

Mitch Raemsch
From: GogoJF on 18 Jun 2010 01:37
On Jun 18, 12:18 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jun 17, 10:15 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 18, 12:13 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 17, 10:06 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jun 18, 12:04 am, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Jun 18, 12:01 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Jun 17, 9:39 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Jun 17, 11:33 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > On Jun 17, 9:23 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > On Jun 17, 2:13 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > How can you be sure range is infinite if the forces are so small that
> > > > > > > > > > they are not even immeasurable?
>
> > > > > > > > > > How will science verify unlimited range then? Where is its evidence?
> > > > > > > > > > Theory suggests that they are limited in time and space..
>
> > > > > > > > > > Mitch Reamsch
>
> > > > > > > > > the physics of a single eye can extend through out the galaxies
>
> > > > > > > > No. We can't see that far with the naked eye!
>
> > > > > > > No, but through the ages the naked eye will be aided!
>
> > > > > > I think the future of astronomy looks great. I am looking forward to
> > > > > > what replaces the Hubble Space Telescope in 2017.
>
> > > > > > Mitch Raemsch
>
> > > > > Exactly.
>
> > > > We have always- to be looking forward- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > Isn't time always going forward even in math. I choose to go forward
> > > with it!
>
> > > Mitch Raemsch
>
> > Well, my friend, you have no idea.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> I have more than an idea of time I have a concept. It is Two Times.
>
> Mitch Raemsch

Well, the only problem with time comes when we take a country measure,
into the city.
From: Androcles on 18 Jun 2010 03:02

"DougC" <prigator(a)aol.com> wrote in message
news:461cd4f4-cd5e-4093-b640-17860e606f85(a)k39g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
| BURT wrote:
|
| > How can you be sure range is infinite
| > How will science verify unlimited range then?
|
| Nothing is infinite.

It certainly is. The further you go the more nothing you'll find there.

| Nothing is unlimited.

Yep. There is no limit to nothing. But that is saying the same.

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: Experiment: Additive Creation; Dirac's new radioactivities Chapt 5 #172; ATOM TOTALITY
Next: God is not happy