Prev: Experiment: Additive Creation; Dirac's new radioactivities Chapt 5 #172; ATOM TOTALITY
Next: God is not happy
From: BURT on 18 Jun 2010 00:33
On Jun 17, 9:23 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jun 17, 2:13 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > How can you be sure range is infinite if the forces are so small that
> > they are not even immeasurable?
>
> > How will science verify unlimited range then? Where is its evidence?
> > Theory suggests that they are limited in time and space.
>
> > Mitch Reamsch
>
> the physics of a single eye can extend through out the galaxies

No. We can't see that far with the naked eye!
From: GogoJF on 18 Jun 2010 00:39
On Jun 17, 11:33 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jun 17, 9:23 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jun 17, 2:13 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > How can you be sure range is infinite if the forces are so small that
> > > they are not even immeasurable?
>
> > > How will science verify unlimited range then? Where is its evidence?
> > > Theory suggests that they are limited in time and space.
>
> > > Mitch Reamsch
>
> > the physics of a single eye can extend through out the galaxies
>
> No. We can't see that far with the naked eye!

No, but through the ages the naked eye will be aided!
From: BURT on 18 Jun 2010 01:01
On Jun 17, 9:39 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jun 17, 11:33 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jun 17, 9:23 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 17, 2:13 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > How can you be sure range is infinite if the forces are so small that
> > > > they are not even immeasurable?
>
> > > > How will science verify unlimited range then? Where is its evidence?
> > > > Theory suggests that they are limited in time and space.
>
> > > > Mitch Reamsch
>
> > > the physics of a single eye can extend through out the galaxies
>
> > No. We can't see that far with the naked eye!
>
> No, but through the ages the naked eye will be aided!

I think the future of astronomy looks great. I am looking forward to
what replaces the Hubble Space Telescope in 2017.

Mitch Raemsch
From: GogoJF on 18 Jun 2010 01:04
On Jun 18, 12:01 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jun 17, 9:39 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 17, 11:33 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 17, 9:23 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jun 17, 2:13 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > How can you be sure range is infinite if the forces are so small that
> > > > > they are not even immeasurable?
>
> > > > > How will science verify unlimited range then? Where is its evidence?
> > > > > Theory suggests that they are limited in time and space.
>
> > > > > Mitch Reamsch
>
> > > > the physics of a single eye can extend through out the galaxies
>
> > > No. We can't see that far with the naked eye!
>
> > No, but through the ages the naked eye will be aided!
>
> I think the future of astronomy looks great. I am looking forward to
> what replaces the Hubble Space Telescope in 2017.
>
> Mitch Raemsch

Exactly.
From: GogoJF on 18 Jun 2010 01:06
On Jun 18, 12:04 am, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jun 18, 12:01 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 17, 9:39 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 17, 11:33 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jun 17, 9:23 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Jun 17, 2:13 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > How can you be sure range is infinite if the forces are so small that
> > > > > > they are not even immeasurable?
>
> > > > > > How will science verify unlimited range then? Where is its evidence?
> > > > > > Theory suggests that they are limited in time and space.
>
> > > > > > Mitch Reamsch
>
> > > > > the physics of a single eye can extend through out the galaxies
>
> > > > No. We can't see that far with the naked eye!
>
> > > No, but through the ages the naked eye will be aided!
>
> > I think the future of astronomy looks great. I am looking forward to
> > what replaces the Hubble Space Telescope in 2017.
>
> > Mitch Raemsch
>
> Exactly.

We have always- to be looking forward
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: Experiment: Additive Creation; Dirac's new radioactivities Chapt 5 #172; ATOM TOTALITY
Next: God is not happy