Prev: Light Compression Experiment
Next: Google Adsense Account Approval Tricks
From: Laurent on 13 May 2010 07:33
John S. Bell was right. As already confirmed by Quantum Mechanics, the
Universe violates locality at the quantum level. Local realism applies
only at the classical level.

The collapse of the wave packet on the EPR and Aspect experiments
doesn't just come from human knowledge acquired during the measuring
process but from a holistic awareness property intrinsic to all
matter. And, as Eugene V. Stefanovich contends: interactions, not
forces, are instantaneously registered throughout space.

Many are amazed at Wheeler's Delayed Choice experiment results, but
that's because they want to understand it from their own perspective.
They want to understand it applying spacetime rules, and that's the
problem. At the quantum level, you need to toss away the notions of
time and distance. For you, who live at the spacetime level, the
photon has maybe traveled billions of miles and taken millions of
light years to arrive, but at the quantum level, its emission,
detection, and measurement, has happened instantaneously. In our
world, it appears that, as we measure the particle, we are deciding
the path the photon had taken millions of years before; when in
reality, the emission and detection of the particle happened
instantaneously. After emitted, the photon remains timelessly
suspended in hyperspace until detected or measured. Then, as its state
is decided and the state vector collapses, it materializes into
spacetime; our level in existence. So, it isn't our knowledge which
collapses the state vector, it is perception. What perceives it could
be anything, dead or alive, the particle's state will be defined
either way.

As we already know, matter and space are one and the same thing
(Einstein), matter tells space how to bend and space tells matter
where to go (Mach). The way science sees it, matter is nothing more
than condensed space. And, in my view, when I talk about a particle, I
might as well be talking about a human being. To me, a man is nothing
more than an uber particle, so to speak. And that's because I believe
in the evolution of matter. Matter, to me, is synonymous to
information; active information, to be precise.

Also, as we should know, there is a wave-particle duality (de Broglie,
Schrödinger, Bohm). The particle is always accompanied by a self
scanning wave, or standing wave, where all the information concerning
the geometrical properties of the particle is contained. This wave is
called a matter wave and can be mathematically described by a wave
function. Each time the wave function collapses, or we have a state
vector reduction, the rock-like state of that particle is defined in
spacetime, as required by spacetime laws. The particle existing in a
rock-like state only at the now moment. That is why it is vibrating.

At the quantum level, motion occurs the way it is created on a TV
screen. As you may know, a TV screen refreshes 60 times per second or
so, that's how motion is created. Imagine the fundamental particle as
a vibrating 3D system refreshing its structure over a trillion times
per second (Planck time). A standing, self-scanning, spherical wave
with a rock-like particle at the center. [Motion and time may seem
like illusions, but the process that is reality is certainly not. Now,
quickly rolling a film in front of the lens inside a movie projector
in order to produce a motion picture... that's an illusion!]

So, each time there is a wave packet collapse, the now state of the
particle is defined. Then and only then, can the particle materialize
into spacetime; where the laws of Thermodynamics and Relativity apply.
Without the information required for the wave packet to collapse there
can be no particle in spacetime; it may exist virtually, but not in
spacetime.

--

http://www.aether-is-one.com
From: Huang on 13 May 2010 08:12
On May 13, 6:33 am, Laurent <cyberd...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> John S. Bell was right. As already confirmed by Quantum Mechanics, the
> Universe violates locality at the quantum level. Local realism applies
> only at the classical level.
>
> The collapse of the wave packet on the EPR and Aspect experiments
> doesn't just come from human knowledge acquired during the measuring
> process but from a holistic awareness property intrinsic to all
> matter. And, as Eugene V. Stefanovich contends: interactions, not
> forces, are instantaneously registered throughout space.


Spacetime is indeterminately continuous / discrete. It can behave as
either one or the other - as you wish. All you need to do is set up
experiments treating it one way or the other and it will accomidate
you.

The speed at which it accomidates you is instantaneous throughout the
universe, because there are no forces involved in this process, it is
strictly an aspect of the fabric of spacetime.

As a thought experiment:
I send someoen out to fetch me some "random quantity of rope". I did
not specify whather I wanted a continuous piece or discrete chunks.
When that person returns to me, depending on how I ask - I should be
able to get either answer. If I ask "how many chunks did you bring" I
should get a discretized answer. If I dont ask "how many chunks" then
by default I must ask "how big is the piece" which would neccesarily
be continuous. This is exactly what happens in the double slit
experiment, and why we have which-way information.

If I fill the entire universe with servants and send them all out to
fetch me some "random amount of rope", then the same process explained
above should be instantaneous throughout the entire universe. I should
be able to expect that the entire universe will contain discrete
chunks if I ask for that, or alternatively it would be filled with
continuous pieces if I ask for that. This should happen
instantaneously because it is really indeterminate whether the rope is
continuous or discrete until it has been brought back to me at which
point I must ask for one or the other. As soon as I have asked for one
or the other - it must be instantaneous that an entire universe filled
with rope would neccesarily comply.

By asking whether continuous or discrete, I am really getting which
way information. It has to be instantaneous and the whole thing is
dirt simple.




From: mpc755 on 13 May 2010 08:27
On May 13, 7:33 am, Laurent <cyberd...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> John S. Bell was right. As already confirmed by Quantum Mechanics, the
> Universe violates locality at the quantum level. Local realism applies
> only at the classical level.
>
> The collapse of the wave packet on the EPR and Aspect experiments
> doesn't just come from human knowledge acquired during the measuring
> process but from a holistic awareness property intrinsic to all
> matter. And, as Eugene V. Stefanovich contends: interactions, not
> forces, are instantaneously registered throughout space.
>
> Many are amazed at Wheeler's Delayed Choice experiment results, but
> that's because they want to understand it from their own perspective.

The following is an explanation of what occurs in nature in a 'delayed
choice quantum eraser' experiment. Following the explanation are two
experiments which will provide evidence of Aether Displacement.

In the image on the right here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delayed_choice_quantum_eraser#The_experiment
When the downgraded photon pair are created, in order for there to be
conservation of momentum, the original photons momentum is maintained.
This means the downgraded photon pair have opposite angular momentums.
We will describe one of the photons as being the 'up' photon and the
other photon as being the 'down' photon. One of the downgraded photons
travels either the red or blue path towards D0 and the other photon
travels either the red or blue path towards the prism.

There are physical waves in the aether propagating both the red and
blue paths. The aether waves propagating towards D0 interact with the
lens and create interference prior to reaching D0. The aether waves
create interference which alters the direction the photon travels
prior to reaching D0. There are actually two interference patterns
being created at D0. One associated with the 'up' photons when they
arrive at D0 and the other interference pattern associated with the
'down' photons when they arrive at D0.

Both 'up' and 'down' photons are reflected by BSa and arrive at D3.
Since there is a single path towards D3 there is nothing for the wave
in the aether to interfere with and there is no interference pattern
and since it is not determined if it is an 'up' or 'down' photon being
detected at D3 there is no way to distinguish between the photons
arriving at D0 which interference pattern each photon belongs to. The
same for photons reflected by BSb and arrive at D4.

Photons which pass through BSa and are reflected by BSc and arrive at
D1 are either 'up' or 'down' photons but not both. If 'up' photons
arrive at D1 then 'down' photons arrive at D2. The opposite occurs for
photons which pass through BSb. Photons which pass through BSa and
pass through BSb and arrive at D1 are all either 'up' or 'down'
photons. If all 'up' photons arrive at D1 then all 'down' photons
arrive at D2. Since the physical waves in the aether traveling both
the red and blue paths are combined prior to D1 and D2 the aether
waves create interference which alters the direction the photon
travels. Since all 'up' photons arrive at one of the detectors and all
'down' photons arrive at the other an interference pattern is created
which reflects back to the interference both sets of photons are
creating at D0.

Figures 3 and 4 here:
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/quant-ph/pdf/9903/9903047v1.pdf
Show the interference pattern of the 'up' and 'down' photons. If you
were to combine the two images and add the peaks together and add the
valleys together you would have the interference pattern of the
original photon. This is evidence the downgraded photon pair maintain
the original photons momentum and have opposite angular momentums.

Nothing is erased. There is no delayed choice. Physical waves in the
aether are traveling both the red and blue paths and when the paths
are combined the waves create interference which alters the direction
the photon 'particle' travels.

Experiments which will provide evidence of Aether Displacement:

Experiment #1:

Instead of having a single beam splitter BSc have two beam splitters
BSca and BScb. Have the photons reflected by mirror Ma interact with
BSca and have the photons reflected by mirror Mb interact with BScb.
Do not combine the red and blue paths. Have additional detectors D1a,
D2a, D1b, and D2b. Have the photons reflected by and propagate through
BSca be detected at D1a and D2a. Have the photons reflected by and
propagate through BScb be detected at D1b and D2b. If you compare the
photons detected at D1a and D1b with the photons detected at D0, the
corresponding photons detected at D0 will form an interference
pattern. If you compare the photons detected at D2a and D2b with the
photons detected at D0, the corresponding photons detected at D0 will
form an interference pattern. What is occurring is all 'up' photons
are being detected at one pair of detectors, for example D1a and D1b,
and all 'down' photons are being detected at the other pair of
detectors, for example D2a and D2b. Interference patterns do not even
need to be created in order to 'go back' and determine the
interference patterns created at D0.

Experiment #2:

Alter the experiment. When the downgraded photon pair are created,
have each photon interact with its own double slit apparatus. Have
detectors at one of the exits for each double slit apparatus. When a
photon is detected at one of the exits, in AD, the photon's aether
wave still exists and is propagating along the path exiting the other
slit. When a photon is not detected at one of the exits, the photon
'particle' along with its associated aether wave exits the other slit.
Combine the path the aether wave the detected photon is propagating
along with the path of the other photon and its associated aether
wave. An interference pattern will still be created. This shows the
aether wave of a detected photon still exists and is able to create
interference with the aether wave of another photon, altering the
direction the photon 'particle' travels.

> They want to understand it applying spacetime rules, and that's the
> problem. At the quantum level, you need to toss away the notions of
> time and distance. For you, who live at the spacetime level, the
> photon has maybe traveled billions of miles and taken millions of
> light years to arrive, but at the quantum level, its emission,
> detection, and measurement, has happened instantaneously. In our
> world, it appears that, as we measure the particle, we are deciding
> the path the photon had taken millions of years before; when in
> reality, the emission and detection of the particle happened
> instantaneously. After emitted, the photon remains timelessly
> suspended in hyperspace until detected or measured. Then, as its state
> is decided and the state vector collapses, it materializes into
> spacetime; our level in existence. So, it isn't our knowledge which
> collapses the state vector, it is perception. What perceives it could
> be anything, dead or alive, the particle's state will be defined
> either way.
>
> As we already know, matter and space are one and the same thing
> (Einstein), matter tells space how to bend and space tells matter
> where to go (Mach). The way science sees it, matter is nothing more
> than condensed space. And, in my view, when I talk about a particle, I
> might as well be talking about a human being. To me, a man is nothing
> more than an uber particle, so to speak. And that's because I believe
> in the evolution of matter. Matter, to me, is synonymous to
> information; active information, to be precise.
>
> Also, as we should know, there is a wave-particle duality (de Broglie,
> Schrödinger, Bohm). The particle is always accompanied by a self
> scanning wave, or standing wave, where all the information concerning
> the geometrical properties of the particle is contained. This wave is
> called a matter wave and can be mathematically described by a wave
> function. Each time the wave function collapses, or we have a state
> vector reduction, the rock-like state of that particle is defined in
> spacetime, as required by spacetime laws. The particle existing in a
> rock-like state only at the now moment. That is why it is vibrating.
>
> At the quantum level, motion occurs the way it is created on a TV
> screen. As you may know, a TV screen refreshes 60 times per second or
> so, that's how motion is created. Imagine the fundamental particle as
> a vibrating 3D system refreshing its structure over a trillion times
> per second (Planck time). A standing, self-scanning, spherical wave
> with a rock-like particle at the center. [Motion and time may seem
> like illusions, but the process that is reality is certainly not. Now,
> quickly rolling a film in front of the lens inside a movie projector
> in order to produce a motion picture... that's an illusion!]
>
> So, each time there is a wave packet collapse, the now state of the
> particle is defined. Then and only then, can the particle materialize
> into spacetime; where the laws of Thermodynamics and Relativity apply.
> Without the information required for the wave packet to collapse there
> can be no particle in spacetime; it may exist virtually, but not in
> spacetime.
>
> --
>
> http://www.aether-is-one.com

From: Huang on 13 May 2010 09:22
I send someone to fetch me a "colored piece of paper", and that is all
the information they are given. And they _must_ comply with this very
unreasonable request.

When that person returns, he MUST posses a piece of paper which is a
superposition of all colors. We dont know what color it actually is
until I ask:
[1] What shade of blue is it ?
or maybe
[2] What shade of red did you bring ?
etc

It's not very difficult really - to see that this is indeed the case.

You dont know what color it is until you ask, and then you will have
any color you wish. That is QM.

From: mpc755 on 13 May 2010 09:45
On May 13, 9:22 am, Huang <huangxienc...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> I send someone to fetch me a "colored piece of paper", and that is all
> the information they are given. And they _must_ comply with this very
> unreasonable request.
>
> When that person returns, he MUST posses a piece of paper which is a
> superposition of all colors. We dont know what color it actually is
> until I ask:
> [1] What shade of blue is it ?
> or maybe
> [2] What shade of red did you bring ?
> etc
>
> It's not very difficult really - to see that this is indeed the case.
>
> You dont know what color it is until you ask, and then you will have
> any color you wish. That is QM.

A moving particle has an associated aether wave. In a double slit
experiment, the moving particle ALWAYS enters and exits a single slit
and the wave enters and exits both slits. Upon exiting the slits the
wave creates interference which alters the direction the particle
travels. Detecting the particle causes decoherence of the associated
aether wave (i.e. turns it into chop) and there is no interference.
That is what occurs physically in nature.
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: Light Compression Experiment
Next: Google Adsense Account Approval Tricks