Question about gravity
in [Relativity]
|
From: John Duffield on 16 Mar 2010 12:04 mpc: that C60 molecule is made out of aether displacement waves.
From: mpc755 on 16 Mar 2010 12:32 On Mar 16, 12:04 pm, John Duffield <johnduffi...(a)btconnect.com> wrote: > mpc: that C60 molecule is made out of aether displacement waves. The C-60 molecule is in the slit(s). While the C-60 molecule is in the slit(s) detectors are placed at the exits to the slits. If the detectors are at the exits to the slits when the C-60 molecule gets there then the C-60 molecule is always detected exiting a single slit. If the detectors are placed and removed from the exits to the slits while the C-60 molecule is in the slit(s) then the C-60 molecule creates an interference pattern. How is this physically possible in your 'understanding' of nature? The most correct answer, to date, is the C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave and it is the associated aether displacement wave which enters and exits multiple slits. The C-60 molecule always enters and exits a single slit. When the associated aether displacement wave exits the slits it creates interference which alters the direction the C-60 molecule travels. Placing detectors at the exits to the slits causes decoherence of the associated aether displacement wave (i.e. turns it into chop) and there is no interference.
From: BURT on 16 Mar 2010 12:46 On Mar 15, 11:06 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 16, 1:55 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On 3/16/10 12:49 AM, mpc755 wrote: > > > > On Mar 16, 1:31 am, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >> On 3/15/10 2:13 AM, mpc755 wrote: > > > >>> In Aether Displacement, my theory, matter and aether are different > > >>> states of the same material. > > > >> If your Aether existed, one would be able to detect it > > >> and measure measure its properties. > > > > It is detectable. It is measurable. Every time a double slit > > > experiment is performed the C-60 molecule enters and exits a single > > > slit. It is the displacement wave in the aether the moving C-60 > > > molecule makes in the aether which enters and exits the available > > > slits and creates interference upon exit the slits. This alters the > > > direction the C-60 molecule travels. > > > What are some of its measured properties and how were the > > measurements made. Cite publications and/or governing equations. > > Yes, the old I wish to remain ignorant so anything that has already > been calculated is correct no matter how nonsensical it is. The > delusional denial defense. Even though it is physically impossible for > a C-60 molecule to enter, travel through, and exit multiple slits > simultaneously without requiring energy, releasing energy, or having a > change in momentum, that is not what is important. What is important > is the mathematics of QM are able to determine the type of > interference pattern the C-60 molecule creates. > > Never mind what QM requires of the C-60 molecule is physically > impossible in nature. No, that is not what is important. For in QM, we > make stuff up like 'wave function probabilities' are physical. No > matter the fact that a wave function probability is a mathematical > construct. That is not what is important. What is important is the > ability to remain in a state of delusional denial. > > Do you want to play the 'future determines the past' and other > nonsensical answers from the delusional denial QM club? And here we > go... > > Detectors are placed at the exits to the slits while the C-60 molecule > is in the slits. If the detectors are left at the exits the C-60 > molecule is always detected exiting a single slit. If the detectors > are placed and then removed from the exits to the slits while the C-60 > molecule is in the slits the C-60 molecule creates and interference > pattern. > > How is this possible? > > Only one of your delusional denial club members has even offered up an > answer and the answer by your club member was the future determines > the past. You read that right. The C-60 molecule will enter one or > multiple slits depending upon there being, or not being, detectors at > the exits to the slits when it gets there in the future. > > In AD, the C-60 molecule always enters a single slit and the > displacement wave the C-60 molecule creates in the aether enters and > exits multiple slits. Detectors at the exits to the slits causes > decoherence of the associated aether displacement wave (i.e. turns the > wave into chop) and there is no interference. When the detectors are > removed prior to the C-60 molecule exiting the slit the displacement > wave exits the slits and creates interfere which alters the direction > the C-60 molecule travels. > > Your answer?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - There are more than one size for the aether waves. There are three sizes. Subatomic atomic and macro. Mitch Raemsch
From: kenseto on 16 Mar 2010 13:20 On Mar 16, 10:48 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 3/16/10 8:49 AM, kenseto wrote: > > > Empty space by definition cannot have property. permittvity and > > permeability are properties of a unique medium occupying space. > > > Ken Seto > > Haven't you notice this property of space that it in expanding > at roughly 71 km/s/Mpc ? Wormy it is not space that is expanding. It is the objects in the medium that are moving apart wrt each other.
From: kenseto on 16 Mar 2010 13:25
On Mar 16, 9:55 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 16, 8:49 am, kenseto <kens...(a)erinet.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mar 15, 2:57 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mar 15, 1:43 pm, kenseto <kens...(a)erinet.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 15, 2:27 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Mar 15, 1:25 pm, "kens...(a)erinet.com" <kens...(a)erinet.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mar 15, 10:08 am, Huang <huangxienc...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mar 15, 9:04 am, kenseto <kens...(a)erinet.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mar 15, 6:43 am, "Peter Webb" > > > > > > > > > <webbfam...(a)DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Not a whole lot to add to what Inertial in particular said. > > > > > > > > > > In GR, gravity is a virtual force in a similar way to centrifugal force in > > > > > > > > > Newton. In both cases its really an acceleration, and the force is just the > > > > > > > > > product (literally) of this acceleration and the mass of the object. > > > > > > > > > > Einstein in GR gave a geometric interpretation of what gravity is. This is > > > > > > > > > very appealing, because it provides a mechanism for force at a distance. > > > > > > > > > Wrong it provides no such physical mechanism. It merely assumes the > > > > > > > > existence of a physical entity caLLED the fabric of spacetime for the > > > > > > > > interacting object to follow. The problem with such assumption is: > > > > > > > > What is the fabric of spacetime physically? This question is relevant > > > > > > > > because SR/GR deny the existence of physical space. > > > > > > > > > Ken Seto > > > > > > > > What ? ".... SR/GR deny the existence of physical space......." > > > > > > > > What the devil are you saying man ????? > > > > > > > > The theory of relativity says that gravity IS deformation of space. > > > > > > > How can this same theory deny the existence of space ??? Better visit > > > > > > > your optometrist really, really soon. > > > > > > > Sigh...How can you deform space when space is defined by Einstein as > > > > > > "empty space".???? > > > > > > Being empty means it has no matter in it. Having no matter in it does > > > > > not mean that space cannot have physical properties. Physical > > > > > properties are not limited to matter. > > > > > Bullshit. fields are stresses in a solid medium occupying space > > > > according to steven weinberg > > > > Solid medium? He said nothing about an electric field being a stress > > > in a solid medium. > > > Do you just make this stuff up as you go along? > > > Hey idiot...His said that in his book "Dream of a final theory" > > I have that book. Cite the page. He does not say that fields are > stresses in a solid medium. > > > > > > Physical properties are not limited to matter. > > > > You know that there is a permittivity of EMPTY SPACE? You know there > > > is a permeability of EMPTY SPACE? You know there is an impedance of > > > EMPTY SPACE? You know there is a gravitational potential in EMPTY > > > SPACE > > > Empty space by definition cannot have property. > > That is incorrect. Empty space means devoid of matter. It does NOT > mean devoid of physical properties. Sure it does....no matter, no physical property. > > > permittvity and > > permeability are properties of a unique medium occupying space. > > That is incorrect. Read your freshman physics text where these > properties are discussed. These properties have been ascribed to empty > space for 150 years. Hey idiot These are not properties of empty space. They are properties of a medium occupying space. Ken Seto > > > > > > > Ken Seto- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - |