Prev: [Update] Gramps 3.2.1: A genealogy program for the ages?
Next: Text Archiver (Follow-Up)
From: Ari on 26 Apr 2010 08:49
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 20:10:02 -0300, Shadow wrote:

> If you get a receipt,

Hint: Shaddup.

You're waaaaaay outside your league again, stooPiD.
--
All you Ferrari drivers, come join us @ www.ferrarichat.com !
All you pilots, jump into the left seat @ www.airlinepilotforums.com !
From: Shadow on 26 Apr 2010 16:18
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 03:58:11 +0000 (UTC), Anonymous
<anonymous(a)not-for-mail.invalid> wrote:

>On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 20:10:02 -0300, Shadow wrote:

>> If you get a receipt, even if it's only a "message received"
>> the path must be traceable, even if the message is split into two or
>> three streams.
>
>You really have the wrong idea about how this works: there is no receipt
>sent back to you when you post to a newsgroup or send an email through a
>chain of remailers using QS Lite or any other remailer software.
>
>The only thing in the headers of the message that arrives at the
>newsgroup is information about the last remailer in the chain. There may
>be 3 or 4 remailers before that in the chain. The path cannot be traced.
OK, but just for arguments sake.
aioe is often offline. So the only way I can tell if a message
of mine was accepted it to
a) get a receipt (ie, a "posted") from my news-software, which
would be impossible if I use remailers, because each one could not
discover the path back to the previous, and eventually to me.
b) visit the site using my conventional method(ISP, plain
login), and letting them log my visit.

So ... two assumptions, I make two questions:

Am I right so far ?
I'm totally out of my area in this, as the "socially
challenged" OP pointed out, but I have a reasonable IQ.
Guess what my next question is ?
[]'s
From: Nomen Nescio on 26 Apr 2010 19:22
Shadow <Sh(a)dow> wrote in
news:0lsbt5t00p0o37s2bfdp4moeh5114rvlar(a)4ax.com:



> So ... two assumptions, I make two questions:
>
> Am I right so far ? I'm totally out of my area in this, as the
> "socially challenged" OP pointed out, but I have a
> reasonable IQ.
> Guess what my next question is ? []'s
>

Whether 90 is considered a "reasonable IQ"?

From: Shadow on 26 Apr 2010 19:56
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 01:22:22 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio
<nobody(a)dizum.com> wrote:

>Shadow <Sh(a)dow> wrote in
>news:0lsbt5t00p0o37s2bfdp4moeh5114rvlar(a)4ax.com:
>> So ... two assumptions, I make two questions:
>>
>> Am I right so far ? I'm totally out of my area in this, as the
>> "socially challenged" OP pointed out, but I have a
>> reasonable IQ.
>> Guess what my next question is ? []'s
>>
>
>Whether 90 is considered a "reasonable IQ"?
If you're proud of it, I suppose it is. Are you ?
[]'s

From: Fritz Wuehler on 26 Apr 2010 23:00
In article <0lsbt5t00p0o37s2bfdp4moeh5114rvlar(a)4ax.com>
Shadow <Sh(a)dow> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 03:58:11 +0000 (UTC), Anonymous
> <anonymous(a)not-for-mail.invalid> wrote:
>
> >On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 20:10:02 -0300, Shadow wrote:
>
> >> If you get a receipt, even if it's only a "message received"
> >> the path must be traceable, even if the message is split into two or
> >> three streams.
> >
> >You really have the wrong idea about how this works: there is no receipt
> >sent back to you when you post to a newsgroup or send an email through a
> >chain of remailers using QS Lite or any other remailer software.
> >
> >The only thing in the headers of the message that arrives at the
> >newsgroup is information about the last remailer in the chain. There may
> >be 3 or 4 remailers before that in the chain. The path cannot be traced.

> OK, but just for arguments sake.
> aioe is often offline. So the only way I can tell if a message
> of mine was accepted it to
> a) get a receipt (ie, a "posted") from my news-software, which
> would be impossible if I use remailers, because each one could not
> discover the path back to the previous, and eventually to me.
> b) visit the site using my conventional method(ISP, plain
> login), and letting them log my visit.

You correct. There are no receipts for remailed messages.

Ok, b) I guess you're saying you use your newsreader to check the
group to see if your message arrived. Is that it? That's what I do.
There is no connection between me posting a message anonymously, and
me, like all the other subscribers, reading the messages in the
group. You cannot be connected by reading the group.

> So ... two assumptions, I make two questions:
>
> Am I right so far ?
> I'm totally out of my area in this, as the "socially
> challenged" OP pointed out, but I have a reasonable IQ.
> Guess what my next question is ?
> []'s

Ok, I'm dense :) What is the question.

Thank you for your questions and the opportunity to explain the
workings. My apologies for refuring to you earlier assumptions as
idiotic. They were simpy wrong, but understandable considering you've
no experience with remailers and there software. We get some people
flat-out denying what we provide is possible--because of there
ignorance on the topic--and refusing to listen to reason. What we do
is real.










First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: [Update] Gramps 3.2.1: A genealogy program for the ages?
Next: Text Archiver (Follow-Up)