Prev: LiveCam 3000 issue
Next: Blue Screen 0x0000007A
From: Walter Wall on 28 May 2008 03:25 "OldDuke" <none(a)nobody.net> wrote in message news:q55p3412oe4lj4h78kheo2321b198o23fo(a)4ax.com... > On Tue, 27 May 2008 15:47:00 +0100, "Walter Wall" <wall(a)privacy.net> > wrote: > >> >>"Bill in Co." <not_really_here(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message >>news:eFq%23ZHfuIHA.4952(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >>> Walter Wall wrote: >>>> "OldDuke" <none(a)nobody.net> wrote in message >>>> news:ttjp241f38jtgukk9s4vo8o94j65elesdp(a)4ax.com... >>>>> On Wed, 14 May 2008 21:50:10 -0400, "Bigdawg" <hzy1369(a)hotmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> "OldDuke" <none(a)nobody.net> wrote in message >>>>>> news:7fak249qd99au32cemdr4hu9rqiib3t69u(a)4ax.com... >>>>>>> On Tue, 13 May 2008 03:13:01 -0700, Eric >>>>>>> <Eric(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Does anyone have any suggestions on whether following RAMs are >>>>>>>> compatible >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> each other? Therefore, I can install both on the same computer. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> My current PC is using following RAM, and I would like to add >>>>>>>> addition >>>>>>>> one. >>>>>>>> NT256T64UH4A0FY-37B >>>>>>>> 256MB 1R X 16 >>>>>>>> PC2-4200U-444-10-C1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The following RAM is shown as below, does anyone have any >>>>>>>> suggestions >>>>>>>> whether following RAM is compatible to above one? >>>>>>>> V826632K24SATG-C0 >>>>>>>> 256MB DDR-333MHz-CL2.5 >>>>>>>> PC2700U-2533-0-A0 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks in advance for any suggestions >>>>>>>> Eric >>>>>>> And this has WHAT to do with the OS? Oh, right, NOTHING. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ask elsewhere >>>>>> >>>>>> as said before that ram can not be used together. >>>>>> OldDuke is a real pain I found a repost for a question I ask back in >>>>>> Mar >>>>>> yesterday and his comments are the same. maybe he should move the >>>>>> bar >>>>>> a >>>>>> little to the right and see the full name of this group >>>>>> PUBLIC.WINDOWSXP.HARDWARE or he's just a ??? >>>>>> >>>>> And what did this question have to do with the WINDOWSXP part of the >>>>> group title? NOTHING. I'm right, you both are WRONG, move on please. >>>>> >>>> >>>> No one gives a hoot. You move on. >>> >>> Oh, come on now. I think you could be a bit more helpful here, >>> Walter, >>> and (perhaps) suggest a where he could move to! (Because I don't think >>> he gets it). >> >>I could but, I'm trying (desparately) not to resort to abuse. But I'm >>close. >> > Really? Oh, I'm shaking thinking of your "abuse." > A post like that just shows your stupidity better than I ever could.
From: JohnO on 29 May 2008 08:59 > > That's the point. A 43 year old (if indeed that is what you are) with a > mental age of 43 wouldn't have posted a remark more likely to be heard in > a school playground. The only person who hasn't got the brains to see > what is going on here is you. You are alone. No-one else agrees with > you. Doesn't that tell you something? Of course not, because you are too > obsessed to see it. > You cannot convince a turd to stop smelling.
From: OldDuke on 29 May 2008 20:04 On Thu, 29 May 2008 08:59:20 -0400, "JohnO" <johno@!NOOSPAM!heathkit.com> wrote: >> >> That's the point. A 43 year old (if indeed that is what you are) with a >> mental age of 43 wouldn't have posted a remark more likely to be heard in >> a school playground. The only person who hasn't got the brains to see >> what is going on here is you. You are alone. No-one else agrees with >> you. Doesn't that tell you something? Of course not, because you are too >> obsessed to see it. >> > >You cannot convince a turd to stop smelling. > Yep. That's why you stink.
From: Walter Wall on 30 May 2008 03:15 "OldDuke" <none(a)nobody.net> wrote in message news:u3hu34p4rjnqldea28k3bj484af97nfv8s(a)4ax.com... > On Thu, 29 May 2008 08:59:20 -0400, "JohnO" > <johno@!NOOSPAM!heathkit.com> wrote: > >>> >>> That's the point. A 43 year old (if indeed that is what you are) with a >>> mental age of 43 wouldn't have posted a remark more likely to be heard >>> in >>> a school playground. The only person who hasn't got the brains to see >>> what is going on here is you. You are alone. No-one else agrees with >>> you. Doesn't that tell you something? Of course not, because you are >>> too >>> obsessed to see it. >>> >> >>You cannot convince a turd to stop smelling. >> > Yep. That's why you stink. > You are not helping your own case one bit. Another playground remark (and from a kindergarten playground no less)
From: Gurney on 1 Jun 2008 18:09
On Fri, 30 May 2008 08:15:00 +0100, "Walter Wall" <wall(a)privacy.net> wrote: > >"OldDuke" <none(a)nobody.net> wrote in message >news:u3hu34p4rjnqldea28k3bj484af97nfv8s(a)4ax.com... >> On Thu, 29 May 2008 08:59:20 -0400, "JohnO" >> <johno@!NOOSPAM!heathkit.com> wrote: >> >>>> >>>> That's the point. A 43 year old (if indeed that is what you are) with a >>>> mental age of 43 wouldn't have posted a remark more likely to be heard >>>> in >>>> a school playground. The only person who hasn't got the brains to see >>>> what is going on here is you. You are alone. No-one else agrees with >>>> you. Doesn't that tell you something? Of course not, because you are >>>> too >>>> obsessed to see it. >>>> >>> >>>You cannot convince a turd to stop smelling. >>> >> Yep. That's why you stink. >> > >You are not helping your own case one bit. Another playground remark (and >from a kindergarten playground no less) > Only a playground remark to respond to YOUR playground remark. |