From: SuperGumby [SBS MVP] on
No they are not. They are attached to CERC ATA. The CERC controller appears
as a RAID device and basically 'pretends' to be a SCSI object but the ATA
bit gives it away. Most ATA RAID does same.

Grab 2*250GB ATA drives, RAID them, copy the install across. If you must.

"J" <japhyrider2005(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:b1c9eb60-de93-4004-8e7a-bce4d9a394a2(a)r18g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 2, 11:20 am, "Cliff Galiher - MVP" <cgali...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> I doubt it, but even if you could, I'd strongly discourage it. IDE drives
> were never designed for server use because ATA as a protocol is not
> robust.
> SCSI has a long heritage of being very intelligent, so it (or SAS) lends
> itself very well to RAID.
>
> The setup you describe, with a span that you'd then be trying to mirror,
> would probably crush your performance on simple IDE drives.
>
> -Cliff
>
> "J" <japhyrider2...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:0139b7ab-b7ac-4a18-8863-4cec9b97c82e(a)h27g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > I inherited a client that has the following setup :
> > SBS 2003 standard sp2
> > Dell CERC ATA Raid Controller
>
> > It has 2 drives : 1 is a simple 80GB drive partitioned into C and D;
> > the other drive is 150GB dynamic spanned to the D.
>
> > Can I put in another 250GB drive and mirror it to the existing
> > partitions?
> > TIA- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

These are SCSI drives


From: SuperGumby [SBS MVP] on
pretty sure I'm right that they are ATA but the OP is being confused as the
controller appears as 'SCSI and RAID devices' in devman.

"Leythos" <spam999free(a)rrohio.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.26202249d5465cdb98a25a(a)us.news.astraweb.com...
> In article <0139b7ab-b7ac-4a18-8863-
> 4cec9b97c82e(a)h27g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, japhyrider2005(a)yahoo.com
> says...
>>
>> I inherited a client that has the following setup :
>> SBS 2003 standard sp2
>> Dell CERC ATA Raid Controller
>>
>> It has 2 drives : 1 is a simple 80GB drive partitioned into C and D;
>> the other drive is 150GB dynamic spanned to the D.
>>
>> Can I put in another 250GB drive and mirror it to the existing
>> partitions?
>> TIA
>
> If you want to make your life simple, install another raid controller
> and install two drives in a raid 1 on it.
>
> I can't directly answer your question, but, I'm going to bet that you
> can't just mirror the existing drive (physical) without trashing it.
>
> BTW, you said they are SCSI in your other reply, but you state ATA in
> the controller above.
>
> So, is the 150 an ATA or SCSI?
>
>
>
> --
> You can't trust your best friends, your five senses, only the little
> voice inside you that most civilians don't even hear -- Listen to that.
> Trust yourself.
> spam999free(a)rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)


From: Leythos on
In article <#Y2cc0r0KHA.6104(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl>, not(a)your.nellie
says...
>
> pretty sure I'm right that they are ATA but the OP is being confused as the
> controller appears as 'SCSI and RAID devices' in devman.

I agree, the ATA in all the Cerc/Perc controllers means IDE and not SATA
or SCIS, but the Device Manager always shows SCSI....

Maybe he should run a BELARC report so that he knows exactly what is in
the machine.


--
You can't trust your best friends, your five senses, only the little
voice inside you that most civilians don't even hear -- Listen to that.
Trust yourself.
spam999free(a)rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
From: Cliff Galiher - MVP on
Glad I'm not losing my mind. I swore I saw ATA somewhere in the first post,
and the response that these were SCSI threw me. :)

-Cliff


"SuperGumby [SBS MVP]" <not(a)your.nellie> wrote in message
news:u5AJfzr0KHA.3380(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> No they are not. They are attached to CERC ATA. The CERC controller
> appears as a RAID device and basically 'pretends' to be a SCSI object but
> the ATA bit gives it away. Most ATA RAID does same.
>
> Grab 2*250GB ATA drives, RAID them, copy the install across. If you must.
>
> "J" <japhyrider2005(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:b1c9eb60-de93-4004-8e7a-bce4d9a394a2(a)r18g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 2, 11:20 am, "Cliff Galiher - MVP" <cgali...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> I doubt it, but even if you could, I'd strongly discourage it. IDE drives
>> were never designed for server use because ATA as a protocol is not
>> robust.
>> SCSI has a long heritage of being very intelligent, so it (or SAS) lends
>> itself very well to RAID.
>>
>> The setup you describe, with a span that you'd then be trying to mirror,
>> would probably crush your performance on simple IDE drives.
>>
>> -Cliff
>>
>> "J" <japhyrider2...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:0139b7ab-b7ac-4a18-8863-4cec9b97c82e(a)h27g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>> > I inherited a client that has the following setup :
>> > SBS 2003 standard sp2
>> > Dell CERC ATA Raid Controller
>>
>> > It has 2 drives : 1 is a simple 80GB drive partitioned into C and D;
>> > the other drive is 150GB dynamic spanned to the D.
>>
>> > Can I put in another 250GB drive and mirror it to the existing
>> > partitions?
>> > TIA- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> These are SCSI drives
>
From: SuperGumby [SBS MVP] on
it's misleading, at best.

Some(many? most?) ATA RAID actually do talk to Windows in a SCSIlike manner,
supporting, fer instance, live add/remove of the 'apparent drive(s)' they
present to the OS. Others simply show in that section because it is 'SCSI'
and 'RAID', not 'SCSI RAID'. Get the distinction?

"Cliff Galiher - MVP" <cgaliher(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:FB367445-B15D-4109-9F60-F7825DDA68BC(a)microsoft.com...
> Glad I'm not losing my mind. I swore I saw ATA somewhere in the first
> post, and the response that these were SCSI threw me. :)
>
> -Cliff
>
>
> "SuperGumby [SBS MVP]" <not(a)your.nellie> wrote in message
> news:u5AJfzr0KHA.3380(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> No they are not. They are attached to CERC ATA. The CERC controller
>> appears as a RAID device and basically 'pretends' to be a SCSI object but
>> the ATA bit gives it away. Most ATA RAID does same.
>>
>> Grab 2*250GB ATA drives, RAID them, copy the install across. If you must.
>>
>> "J" <japhyrider2005(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:b1c9eb60-de93-4004-8e7a-bce4d9a394a2(a)r18g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
>> On Apr 2, 11:20 am, "Cliff Galiher - MVP" <cgali...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I doubt it, but even if you could, I'd strongly discourage it. IDE
>>> drives
>>> were never designed for server use because ATA as a protocol is not
>>> robust.
>>> SCSI has a long heritage of being very intelligent, so it (or SAS) lends
>>> itself very well to RAID.
>>>
>>> The setup you describe, with a span that you'd then be trying to mirror,
>>> would probably crush your performance on simple IDE drives.
>>>
>>> -Cliff
>>>
>>> "J" <japhyrider2...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>
>>> news:0139b7ab-b7ac-4a18-8863-4cec9b97c82e(a)h27g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > I inherited a client that has the following setup :
>>> > SBS 2003 standard sp2
>>> > Dell CERC ATA Raid Controller
>>>
>>> > It has 2 drives : 1 is a simple 80GB drive partitioned into C and D;
>>> > the other drive is 150GB dynamic spanned to the D.
>>>
>>> > Can I put in another 250GB drive and mirror it to the existing
>>> > partitions?
>>> > TIA- Hide quoted text -
>>>
>>> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> These are SCSI drives
>>