From: briand on 15 Apr 2010 10:20 On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 00:59:50 -0500 Stan Hoeppner <stan(a)hardwarefreak.com> wrote: > briand(a)aracnet.com put forth on 4/15/2010 12:08 AM: > > > And .32-trunk is the running kernel, has been for some time, and > > I've rebooted several times. > > Did up aptitude upgrade to the .32-trunk kernel or is your .32-trunk > kernel what resulted from a fresh install? Also, what architecture > is your kernel? Most, if not all, of the commenters in the bug were > using amd64 kernels. > Intel Atom I have an AMD64 also, but it is an NVIDIA based ethernet. I'm relatively certain it's an upgrade kernel, but I'm not positive. Brian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100415071301.17b13eb6(a)windy.deldotd.com
From: Stan Hoeppner on 15 Apr 2010 19:10 briand(a)aracnet.com put forth on 4/15/2010 9:13 AM: > On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 00:59:50 -0500 > Stan Hoeppner <stan(a)hardwarefreak.com> wrote: > >> briand(a)aracnet.com put forth on 4/15/2010 12:08 AM: >> >>> And .32-trunk is the running kernel, has been for some time, and >>> I've rebooted several times. >> >> Did up aptitude upgrade to the .32-trunk kernel or is your .32-trunk >> kernel what resulted from a fresh install? Also, what architecture >> is your kernel? Most, if not all, of the commenters in the bug were >> using amd64 kernels. >> > > Intel Atom 5 of teh 19 Atom CPUs support x86-64. Which kernel are you running? 32bit i3/4/5/686 or AMD64? > I'm relatively certain it's an upgrade kernel, but I'm not positive. Could you check your logs? -- Stan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4BC79B4F.2080500(a)hardwarefreak.com
From: briand on 15 Apr 2010 23:50 On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:03:43 -0500 Stan Hoeppner <stan(a)hardwarefreak.com> wrote: > briand(a)aracnet.com put forth on 4/15/2010 9:13 AM: > > On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 00:59:50 -0500 > > Stan Hoeppner <stan(a)hardwarefreak.com> wrote: > > > >> briand(a)aracnet.com put forth on 4/15/2010 12:08 AM: > >> > >>> And .32-trunk is the running kernel, has been for some time, and > >>> I've rebooted several times. > >> > >> Did up aptitude upgrade to the .32-trunk kernel or is > >> your .32-trunk kernel what resulted from a fresh install? Also, > >> what architecture is your kernel? Most, if not all, of the > >> commenters in the bug were using amd64 kernels. > >> > > > > Intel Atom > > 5 of teh 19 Atom CPUs support x86-64. Which kernel are you running? > 32bit i3/4/5/686 or AMD64? > Linux bamboo 2.6.32-trunk-686 #1 SMP Sun Jan 10 06:32:16 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux Now that I think about it, I remember downloading various packages with firmware in the name, and further remember that the ethernet firmware did not seem to be among them. > > I'm relatively certain it's an upgrade kernel, but I'm not positive. > > Could you check your logs? > Sorry, you'll have to be more specific. Here's some dpkg --list output which might help: ii linux-headers-2.6.32 ii linux-image-2.6.32 ii linux-source-2.6.32 Brian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100415204144.7a846630(a)windy.deldotd.com
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: debian-user-digest Digest V2010 #630 Next: Reportbug-ng Cannot Retrieve Info |