Prev: fractal universe= repeating energy spectra
Next: Relative motion and the experts
From: Hagar on 30 Jun 2010 16:01

"Ed Conrad" <altered_ego517(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:62fa0436-ccec-4622-9b36-340ba42e4b1d(a)r27g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
> <

You tell them Ed. They all do for the money, don't they.

You are the only true scientist, the shining beacon in the
darkness, the sneaky fart in an elevator, the dog turd on
the dark sidewalk, the cat's barf on the kitchen floor.

PS: Nice rock collection !!!


From: Father Haskell on 10 Jul 2010 23:44
On Jun 30, 8:47 am, Ed Conrad <altered_ego...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Like when Hawking, who should know better, stated recently that we
> should fear contact with extraterrestrials.

As well we SHOULD! Why do you think we have the second
ammendment?

From: Elijahovah on 11 Jul 2010 08:13
When it comes to dark matter
when it comes to extra terrestial
when it comes to extra terrestrial dark matter
or extra terrestrial dark energy

A man with a demon would know if he tells us
and warns us to stay away from the demons
and dark angels who have deserted God because
their excuse is man has also deserted God.

I think bad people can give good warnings
if the bad is actually their experience whether
the warning is properly given nor administered
it still exists as a warning.

Heed it.
ELIJAH
From: Elijahovah on 11 Jul 2010 08:31
Think about.
we see infrared LIGHT with a tool
and we see ultraviolet LIGHT with a tool
yet until we could see it, it was invisible,
and so it was not light but dark (invisible).
The energy we call light was then dark
until we could see it. And so we now have this
new coined word dark-matter only becuse we cant see it.

What shall we name it when we later see it.... Hawking matters?
I don't think he does.
He is just a living replacement of dead Carl Sagan.
If he indeed is correct about dark matter,
and yet has not discovered how to see it,
then all that he has displayed so far is faith in the invisible,
with no effort to make it visible with a tool.
He is like those with faith in God the invisible who
do not want the evidence of God;
the evidence will allow others to expand on his concept
rather than have full attention around him alone
as the priest of God or top current concepts.
From: tt on 12 Jul 2010 16:31
On Jul 11, 8:31 am, Elijahovah <rschil...(a)wi.rr.com> wrote:
> Think about.
> we see infrared LIGHT with a tool
> and we see ultraviolet LIGHT with a tool
> yet until we could see it, it was invisible,
> and so it was not light but dark (invisible).
> The energy we call light was then dark
> until we could see it. And so we now have this
> new coined word dark-matter only becuse we cant see it.
>
> What shall we name it when we later see it.... Hawking matters?
> I don't think he does.
> He is just a living replacement of dead Carl Sagan.
> If he indeed is correct about dark matter,
> and yet has not discovered how to see it,
> then all that he has displayed so far is faith in the invisible,
> with no effort to make it visible with a tool.
> He is like those with faith in God the invisible who
> do not want the evidence of God;
> the evidence will allow others to expand on his concept
> rather than have full attention around him alone
> as the priest of God or top current concepts.

You obviously have a stranglehold on the realities of physics and
the fabric of the universe....it's no wonder so many scientists turn
their backs on science and turn to mythology to formulate successful
theories and constructs...
Nootttt....hah!
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: fractal universe= repeating energy spectra
Next: Relative motion and the experts