Relativistic raising of the Djed-pillar
in [Relativity]
|
From: Darwin123 on 30 Jul 2010 19:11 On Jul 23, 11:01 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote: > ____ > | | > ========= > | | > ========= > | | > ========= > | | > | | > | | > | | > / \ > / \ > ===== > > THE DJED-PILLAR > > The Djed-pillar was a ubiquitous divine symbol in ancient > Egypt. It ranks perhaps second only to the Ankh as a > religious symbol yet no one knows the origin of the > Djed-pillar. Budge thought it was a mason's table which I > find incredible while some have suggested it was originally > a Nileometer. > Doubtlessly the suggestive psychological form of the > object places it in the common "Venetian blind" category > which is well known to evoke a visual nuance of > transcendence. This is considerably off topic. Egyptian mysticism has nothing to do with physics, let alone relativity. Maybe there is a connection in your mind. Tell us how the Djed- pillar relates to relativity or kindly stop posting this drivel.
From: Androcles on 30 Jul 2010 19:22 "Darwin123" <drosen0000(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:466c6cb6-6ca7-49af-a513-e3381efac4ab(a)j9g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... This is considerably off topic. Egyptian mysticism has nothing to do with physics, let alone relativity. Maybe there is a connection in your mind. Tell us how the Djed- pillar relates to relativity or kindly stop posting this drivel. ================================================ This is considerably off topic. Relativity has nothing to do with physics, let alone mathematics. Maybe there is a connection in your mind. Tell us how mathematics relates to relativity or fuckin' well stop posting your drivel, dumbfuck.
From: purple on 30 Jul 2010 20:42 On 7/30/2010 5:30 PM, Geopelia wrote: > How big would a kite have to be to raise one of the large pyramid stones? > > How much wind do you have? :-)
From: George Hammond on 30 Jul 2010 22:23 On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:11:42 -0700 (PDT), Darwin123 <drosen0000(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >On Jul 23, 11:01�pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote: >> � � � � ____ >> � � � � | � � �| >> ========= >> � � � � | � � �| >> ========= >> � � � � | � � �| >> ========= >> � � � � | � � �| >> � � � � | � � �| >> � � � � | � � �| >> � � � � | � � �| >> � � � �/ � � � �\ >> � � � / � � � � �\ >> � � � ===== >> >> THE DJED-PILLAR >> >> � �The Djed-pillar was a ubiquitous divine symbol in ancient >> Egypt. �It ranks perhaps second only to the Ankh as a >> religious symbol yet no one knows the origin of the >> Djed-pillar. �Budge thought it was a mason's table which I >> find incredible while some have suggested it was originally >> a Nileometer. >> � �Doubtlessly the suggestive psychological form of the >> object places it in the common "Venetian blind" category >> which is well known to evoke a visual nuance of >> transcendence. > > This is considerably off topic. Egyptian mysticism has nothing >to do with physics, let alone relativity. > Maybe there is a connection in your mind. Tell us how the Djed- >pillar relates to relativity or kindly stop posting this drivel. > > [Hammond] Hammond (2003) has published the discovery that the phenomena we call "God" is actually a relativistic curvature of reality... i.e. a relativistic curvature of SUBJECTIVE spacetime; as opposed to Gravity which as we all know is a relativistic curvature of OBJECTIVE spacetime. Meanwhile. there is cybernetic loop popularly referred to as the Trinity which regulates the magnitude of this curvature of reality in the individual. Abrupt changes in this curvature are the cause of "miracles" so called. Altho Xtianity only discovered this cybernetic loop 1500 years ago, it appears that the Egyptians discovered it at least 4,000 years ago and symbolized it iconically as the Djed-pillar. So, this post is part and parcel of the "Relativistic explanation of God" which I have published in the peer reviewed literature. Therefore it is an "applied physics" theory and it is in fact an "applied relativity" theory. Thank you so much for your gracious magnanimity and kind forbearance in allowing me to discuss an applied Relativity proof of God despite its apparent irrelevance to you and perhaps to the rest of the physics department. Bear in mind that theire ARE other physicists, some of them recognized authorities, who would be interested in a scientific (indeed Relativistic) explanation and proof of God. G. Hammond M.S. Physics ======================================== GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE Primary site http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond Mirror site http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 =======================================
From: George Hammond on 30 Jul 2010 22:58
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 10:30:39 +1200, "Geopelia" <phildoran(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote: >How big would a kite have to be to raise one of the large pyramid stones? > [Hammond] The formula for the lift of a flat plate is: Lift = 1/2 rho V^2 A and for an airplane wing it is : Lift=1/2 Cl rho V^2 where rho=air density (.0024 slugs/ft^3) and V=air velocity in ft/ sec A= area of the wing in sq. ft. and Cl=the lift coefficient of the wing, generally a number between 1 and 1.3 for a curved wing but probably less than one for a kite, say .6 The average weight of the stone blocks in the pyramids is 2.5 tons apiece. So assuming manageable wind of 60 mph max (66 ft/sec) and a llift coefficient of .6 for a kite and 2.5 ton (5,000 lb) blocks, we have: 5,000 lbs = 1/2 .6 .0024 (88)^2 A and solving for A we get: A = kite area = 1793 sq. feet = 42 x 42 foott square kite. So basically.... a 40 foot kite and 60 mph wind would do it. ======================================== GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE Primary site http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond Mirror site http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 ======================================= |