Relativistic raising of the Djed-pillar
in [Relativity]
|
From: George Hammond on 2 Aug 2010 17:54 On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 10:24:22 +0200, Bernhard Schornak <schornak(a)web.de> wrote: >George Hammond wrote: > > >> George Hammond wrote: >> >>> Bernhard Schornak wrote: >>> >> [Hammond] >> P.S.---- >> On the subject of the Trinity, the fact that you are >> unaware of is that the Trinity is a SCIENTIFIC OBJECT caused >> by a scentific fact. Basically, the body has a genotypic >> blueprint for a perfect physical body and it proceeds to >> produce that body (the phenotype) using a feedback loop >> where the output is supposed to equal the input. >> Unfortunately the output never equals the input... no one >> turns out to be fully grown, which causes part of the mind >> to be "unconscious" (i.e. ungrown), so mentally speaking we >> have a feedback loop which is shown here: >> >> http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond/TrinityFAQ.html > > >[Schornak] >Okay, I get back to that later. I just have no >time left at the moment because I am busy with >a lot of other things right now. It's not for- >gotten, just delayed. > > [Hammond] Okay Bernie, let's get right to the point. You have said elsewhere that: ==Schornak says====== There was no Trinity in the Egyptian religion. ================ I AM GOING TO PROVE THAT SCHORNAK IS WRONG! and the proof that you are wrong lies in this fact: The Egyptians posited the existence of 3 fundamental FUNCTIONAL UNITS of the human mind: 1. the AKH 2. the KA 3. the BA ==Hammond says========== I will show that the (AKH-KA-BA) is identical to the Christian Trinity of (FATER-SON-HOLY GHOST) ===================== Firstly, the Akh, Ka, Ba, were NOT GODS.... they were entirely distinct from the Egyptian pantheon. They were described as the 3 primary FUNCTIONAL componentas of the human mind: 1. See the AKH at: http://web.ukonline.co.uk/gavin.egypt/images/pa24.jpg (note: From the Egyptian Book of the Dead, papyrus of Ani. Here Ani is seen worshipping the AKH which is represented as the Crested Ibis) The AKH was described as the perfected version of the human body/mind. Achieving this state was the goal of life. Therefore the AKH represents the first person of the Trinity, the Father. As you know the hieroglyphic symbol for the Akh was the crested Ibis. Because the AKH represents the spiritually perfect body, this is the representation of the first person of the Trinity, God the father, who in Christianity is in fact the spiritually perfect being. See 2. See the KA at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ka_statue The KA was symbolized by a pair of uplifted arms and was supposed to represent the physical body in this world as opposed to the AKH which represents the spiritual body in heaven. Therefore it KA represents the second person of the Trinity, the "Son" in the Christian Trinity. 3. see the BA at: http://www.civilization.ca/cmc/exhibitions/civil/egypt/images/reli19b.jpg The BA which was represented by a bird with a human head it is universally agreed among all scholars is the Egyptian representation of the "soul" or the "Holy Spirit", and therefore this is the third person of the Trinity, the Holy Ghost. Thus we have overwhelmingly demonstrated that there was a Trinity and the Egyptian religion and it proves to be identical to the trinity of Christianity: AKH = FATHER KA = SON BA = HOLY GHOST So please Bernie, stop making reckless and amateurish claims such as "there was no Trinity in the Egyptian religion". You simply don't know what you're talking about. Now as far as the Djed pillar being a "mechanico-visual" iconic symbol of the Trinity.... you can go on and debate that because only one who is highly initiated and expert in this study (such as me) would know why it is. But whatever you do, don't go around reciting a stupid statement such as "there was no Trinity in the Egyptian religion" because obviously you you are easily proven wrong. ======================================== GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE Primary site http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond Mirror site http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 =======================================
From: John Stafford on 2 Aug 2010 19:51 In article <i37kc1$l0o$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Bernhard Schornak <schornak(a)web.de> wrote: > I know this experiment, but did not know that it > is that old. It is amazing that all waves behave > similar, be it water, photons or electrons. Consider it evidence of the shortcoming of contemporary physics.
From: George Hammond on 2 Aug 2010 22:22 On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 18:51:36 -0500, John Stafford <nhoj(a)droffats.ten> wrote: >In article <i37kc1$l0o$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, > Bernhard Schornak <schornak(a)web.de> wrote: > >> I know this experiment, but did not know that it >> is that old. It is amazing that all waves behave >> similar, be it water, photons or electrons. > >Consider it evidence of the shortcoming of contemporary physics. > > [Hammond] Yes.... basically the problem is that there IS NO rational explanation of WHY the wave-interference pattern REMAINS even after the light is turned down so low that only ONE PHOTON AT A TIME is passing through the 2-slit plate. I mean... how can ONE PHOTON AT A TIME GOING THROUGH ONE SLIT AT A TIME cause an INTERFERENCE pattern...? This question has never been adequately explained by moden quantum mechanics even though a mindless application of the superposition mathematics gives the right answer.... and it is THIS FACT that underlies the modern suspicion that quantum mechanics is an "incomplete theory"...... Thomas Young by the way was the one who invented the 2-slit experiment.... and in his spare time made an early and historic breakthrough in the deciperment of Egyptian heiroglyphics. Which goes to show you that a physicist can be curious about ANYTHING.... even God! ======================================== GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE Primary site http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond Mirror site http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 =======================================
From: George Hammond on 3 Aug 2010 00:48 On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 09:49:17 +0200, Bernhard Schornak <schornak(a)web.de> wrote: >George Hammond wrote: > >> George Hammond wrote: >> >>> George Hammond wrote: >>> >>>> Bernhard Schornak wrote: >>>> >>> [Hammond] >>> P.S.---- >>> >>> >> [Hammond] >> PPS: >> >> Bernie.... try to keep in mind that the REASON that I am >> so intently scrutinizing ancient Egypian Theology is because >> I am currently investigating yhr theory of "Life After >> Death" .......<SNIP> > >[Schornak] >Life after death was part of Egyptian religion from >its very beginning. ........<SNIP> > >=> Ka (spirit, soul) > > <LARGE SNIP> > >[Schornak] >. It is worth to read the Book of the Dead > >http://www.touregypt.net/bkofdead.htm > >to get in touch with beliefs and myths of his time. > [Hammond] Who do you think you're kidding? I've been studying the Egyptian Book of the Dead for 30 years. I hope you answer my post containing a "proof" that YOU ARE WRONG and that the Egyptians clearly discovered the Trinity and formulated it in the BA-KA-AKH. So you're statement that the Egyptians didn't have a Trinity is proven false. I'm talking about my post of yesterday with the Message-ID: <n8fe569k86sf15671im7le4qlr4a77se5d(a)4ax.com> After you answer that post and we get that point cleared up... maybe we can discuss how and why the Egyptians discovered the theory of Life After Death and what that means regarding the truth of it. ======================================== GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE Primary site http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond Mirror site http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 =======================================
From: Bernhard Schornak on 3 Aug 2010 05:38
George Hammond schrieb: <snip> >> http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/simple_search.cws_home?boost=true&needs_keyword=true&adv=false&action=simple_search&default=default&keywords=hammond&submitTopNav=Search As long as your name is not listed there, there are no "peer-reviewed documents published by Elsevier". At least not from you. There are 53 ducuments which were written by other Hammond's, though. You neither provided verifiable facts, nor were you able to offer a plausible theory matching the rules of serious scientific work. Your argument "I got an academic grade" doesn't back up any of your claims. Scientific statements either are false or true, re- gardless of the persons who made them. You are not willing to accept scientific methods as only valid tools to prove / disprove statements, so it is pointless to continue this "discussion". Take your diplomas, nail them onto your wall and worship them five times a day if it makes more sense to you than to exchange arguments with other people. It is sad how people waste mental capacities... Greetings from Augsburg Bernhard Schornak |