Debunking Nimtz Here is a very good analysis of his latest paper uploaded on arxiv: http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070816-faster-than-the-speed-of-light-no-i-dont-think-so.html Nimtz has been making this ridiculous claims for years and he has been countered in numerous venues. In spite of all the criticisms, he keeps a... 11 Oct 2007 13:53
GETTING RID OF EINSTEIN RELATIVITY There is ONLY ONE FUNDAMENTAL ERROR in Einstein's relativity: Einstein's principle of constancy of the speed of light: http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/ "...light is always propagated in empty space with a definite velocity c which is independent of the state of motion of the emitting body" ... 10 Dec 2007 02:26
What is the Aether? The aether is simply the space between two points. David Bohm called it general space as he said space is what unite us, not what separates us. Mach called it momentum space as he explained the force of Inertia. Einstein and others like called it free space as they explained permeability and permittivity. So there ... 3 Aug 2007 12:21
How do we define spin with curvature and torsion? PS 1. We want to directly couple the torsion field not only to spin S of matter but to J = L + S of matter. Most important is orbital angular momentum L-torsion field coupling and I know papers exist on this topic. 2. The association of the 4 intrinsically warped tetrad fields A(4)^a is to a kind of Yang-Mill... 8 Mar 2007 15:06
relativity vs velocity addition Hi, Although the symmetric twin paradox can be explaied by ALT(Aether theory with Lorentz Transformations) , I am a relativist. So after I was sure SR(special relativity) is incorrect, I started to search explanation(s) of the paradox in a relativist way. According to me the starting point ought to be the velo... 18 Dec 2006 04:19
Questions on world-line In SR the world line is the path of an object in space with the passage of time. Each object has its own world-line. Questions: 1. Does this mean that the world-line of an object is the result of the individual motion of the object? 2. SR says that there is no such thing as individual motion. There is only relati... 31 Aug 2006 13:57
Hard SR questions? Ship (A) travel 0.99c approaching earth. At a distance of 300 000 km as seen from planet (B) inertial frame the ship start a framed TV transmission. The transmission is such that 60 frames will be sent from ship (A) during the distance of 300 000 km relative earths inertial frame. Now my question. 1. How lo... 14 Aug 2006 13:50
Basic postulates of SR "hanson" <hanson(a)quick.net> wrote in message news:IDoAg.4779$ee1.2772(a)trnddc06... "Peter Kinane" <pkinane(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:easm9o$814$1(a)reader01.news.esat.net... "Effectuationism Navigation Model", http://www.effectuationism.com/forum/messages/69/73.html?1153656126 This arises out... 15 Aug 2006 02:26
curvature of spacetime Around the proton and the electron is a force. Can we not suppose that there is an outward and an inward curvature to account for the positive and negative electric forces? However, the opposing curvatures within the atom would cancel each other out resulting in a net curvature of zero. Such a view totally disregar... 7 Apr 2006 20:59 |