Relativity
in [Science]
|
Scientific American: Light losing energy! On Jun 28, 3:18 pm, JeffRelf.F-M.FM @. wrote: Light from 9 giga·years ago had to climb out of deeper gravity wells, so it's more red·shifted. As you go back farther in time, by giga·years, the universe is more and more dense, less dissipated, less spent, more predictable. OnceeXergyis spent, that's it, it NEVER... 30 Jun 2010 04:21
Light from 9 giga·years ago had to climb out of deeper gravity wells. <PRE> Light from 9 giga·years ago had to climb out of deeper gravity wells, so it's more red·shifted. As you go back farther in time, by giga·years, the universe is more and more dense, less dissipated, less “spent”, more predictable. Once <A hRef="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exergy">eXergy</A> is spent, tha... 28 Jun 2010 18:23
NEW DRAFT "THEORIES REDUCING TO QUANTUM MECHANICS, QUANTUM ELECTRODYNAMICS DOESN'T" NEW DRAFT "THEORIES REDUCING TO QUANTUM MECHANICS, QUANTUM ELECTRODYNAMICS DOESN'T" This 49 pages /Research/ draft analyzes the internal consistency of different quantum theories of electrodynamics, their compatibility with quantum mechanics, and their confrontation with experiments and observations. The the... 28 Jun 2010 19:29
Scientific American: Light losing energy! (reposted because SOMEbody omitted alt.astronomy) "eric gisse" <jowr.pi.nospam(a)gmail.com> wrote... in message news:i08p7p$tbn$5(a)news.eternal-september.org... ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: [...] Yes. Earth lies on the outskirts of our galaxy. Average cosmic light is emitted much closer to the centres of other galaxies. Since light slows as it esc... 28 Jun 2010 13:57
Researching Quanitifying Gravity. To Charles, Richard and all. On Jun 28, 3:52 am, Oh No <N...(a)charlesfrancis.wanadoo.co.uk> wrote: Thus spake Richard D. Saam <rds...(a)att.net> On 6/27/10 4:25 PM, Oh No wrote: Yes 'there are many consistent ways of constructing a stress energy tensor to model different physical systems' b... 4 Jul 2010 16:39
Physics Researchers: Collaborate with over 14,300 Researchers at MyNetResearch.com Dear Researcher, Publishing quality academic papers engages a lot of our waking hours. In addition, many of us work hard to write compelling grant proposals. Research tools have changed a great deal over the years. To hear the Huffington Post put it in the article Science Goes Social, " scientists have so f... 27 Jun 2010 20:31
Spin 1 & 1/2 difference Not many, but anyone know the true difference spin 1 & 1/2.... Today Tornado Alex is born, gives notion of how wave can be converted to spin to create an individual (in_divid_e) entity within the wave. From what I've read and conceived, the spin is directly related to angular moment and periods....and that peri... 28 Jun 2010 10:36
Howz about a plank force? By now, you, especially those who Fourier, do knoweth that in order to convert wave into mass (photon particle), you take the area under the wave (amplitude x RMS (.707)) and multiply it with the wavelength.... That which has mass and velocity, has both momentum and force.... Knowing the Plank mass, there sh... 29 Jun 2010 09:39
The REAL Pauli Particle Principle Science knows that two particles attract yet REMAIN separate from the other. ------------ Permitting my perception, that remainder seems to be an act of repulsion (thus both a force of attraction accompanied by a force of repulsion at closer distance). ------------ Science knows that photons do not remain ... 27 Jun 2010 15:01 |