SIXTY MINUTES: Bloom Box, Projected As Cost Effective Fuel Cell
in [Basics]
|
Prev: Be ready to be killed, or take action to stop the global suicide. Scandal at CERN.
Next: OPERATIONS AND SUPPLY MANAGEMENT 12-E JACOBS Test Bank and solution manual
From: Bret Cahill on 22 Feb 2010 23:14 > >>>>>>>> This looks like a real working solution to the cheap, clean energy > >>>>>>>> conundra challenge > >> It's almost certainly not real, and not working. > > >> This sort of nonsense gets announced every day or so. > > >> John > > >> This sort of nonsense gets announced every day or so. > > Yeah, mostly from Bret Cahill, If we stop responding will he go > > away? > > > George H. > > You keep proving that you can't stop yourselves from responding. > Somehow, for some reason, somebody will evidently almost always be > inprired to respo0nd, and then somebody else, and then you are > speculating on BloomBoxes or whatever else there is --- because it is at > least conversation. > > Evidently, without someone like Brett, conversation is quite limited. > > Just look at the long periods of no conversations, punctuated by loads > of conversations when Cahill stirs up the dust. > > Without leadership, no matter what quality, there isn't much technical > conversation. > > At least, that is what I SEE just from the postings. I'm western civilization's first tech incendiary. Bret Cahill "A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right . . ." -- The Infamous Incendiary Thomas Paine (1776)
From: John Larkin on 23 Feb 2010 00:56 On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:03:24 -0600, pamela <bicycleguy123(a)gmail.com> wrote: >George Herold wrote: >> On Feb 22, 8:15 pm, John Larkin >> <jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 07:01:17 -0800 (PST), Bret Cahill >>> >>> <BretCah...(a)peoplepc.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> This looks like a real working solution to the cheap, clean energy >>>>>>>>> conundra challenge >>> It's almost certainly not real, and not working. >>> >>> This sort of nonsense gets announced every day or so. >>> >>> John >> >>> This sort of nonsense gets announced every day or so. >> Yeah, mostly from Bret Cahill, If we stop responding will he go >> away? >> >> George H. > >You keep proving that you can't stop yourselves from responding. >Somehow, for some reason, somebody will evidently almost always be >inprired to respo0nd, and then somebody else, and then you are >speculating on BloomBoxes or whatever else there is --- because it is at >least conversation. > >Evidently, without someone like Brett, conversation is quite limited. > >Just look at the long periods of no conversations, punctuated by loads >of conversations when Cahill stirs up the dust. > >Without leadership, no matter what quality, there isn't much technical >conversation. > >At least, that is what I SEE just from the postings. The more serious stuff gets posted to s.e.d. John
From: Robert Cohen on 23 Feb 2010 09:38 On Feb 22, 9:58 pm, John Stafford <n...(a)droffats.ten> wrote: > Glaring shortcoming of the video - "Carbon Footprint" :) > > For all we know it is sucking up oxygen and spewing out CO2 like friggin > crazy. > > Nothing is for nothing. re: speculation about harmful carbon compound(s) Sophisticated hype: but: The experienced venture capitalist, plus Google, Fedex, Ebay, etal aren't going to be conned and ridiculed knowingly at their country club lemonade socials At least, we hope they're not kidding themselves I am cynical & agnostic too May the by-products be made harmless by the relevant reigning god and goddess Granted, secretive "ink" does sound like blue sky fantasy and/ or it catalyzes a lovely "fool cell cancer"
From: George Herold on 23 Feb 2010 09:55 On Feb 22, 11:03 pm, pamela <bicycleguy...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > George Herold wrote: > > On Feb 22, 8:15 pm, John Larkin > > <jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 07:01:17 -0800 (PST), Bret Cahill > > >> <BretCah...(a)peoplepc.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>> This looks like a real working solution to the cheap, clean energy > >>>>>>>> conundra challenge > >> It's almost certainly not real, and not working. > > >> This sort of nonsense gets announced every day or so. > > >> John > > >> This sort of nonsense gets announced every day or so. > > Yeah, mostly from Bret Cahill, If we stop responding will he go > > away? > > > George H. > > You keep proving that you can't stop yourselves from responding. > Somehow, for some reason, somebody will evidently almost always be > inprired to respo0nd, and then somebody else, and then you are > speculating on BloomBoxes or whatever else there is --- because it is at > least conversation. > > Evidently, without someone like Brett, conversation is quite limited. > > Just look at the long periods of no conversations, punctuated by loads > of conversations when Cahill stirs up the dust. > > Without leadership, no matter what quality, there isn't much technical > conversation. > > At least, that is what I SEE just from the postings.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Yup I agree, I've been trying to start a few...but. So what are you designing/building/testing these days Pamela? George H.
From: pamela on 23 Feb 2010 12:35
George Herold wrote: > On Feb 22, 11:03 pm, pamela <bicycleguy...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> George Herold wrote: >>> On Feb 22, 8:15 pm, John Larkin >>> <jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >>>> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 07:01:17 -0800 (PST), Bret Cahill >>>> <BretCah...(a)peoplepc.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> This looks like a real working solution to the cheap, clean energy >>>>>>>>>> conundra challenge >>>> It's almost certainly not real, and not working. >>>> This sort of nonsense gets announced every day or so. >>>> John >>>> This sort of nonsense gets announced every day or so. >>> Yeah, mostly from Bret Cahill, If we stop responding will he go >>> away? >>> George H. >> You keep proving that you can't stop yourselves from responding. >> Somehow, for some reason, somebody will evidently almost always be >> inprired to respo0nd, and then somebody else, and then you are >> speculating on BloomBoxes or whatever else there is --- because it is at >> least conversation. >> >> Evidently, without someone like Brett, conversation is quite limited. >> >> Just look at the long periods of no conversations, punctuated by loads >> of conversations when Cahill stirs up the dust. >> >> Without leadership, no matter what quality, there isn't much technical >> conversation. >> >> At least, that is what I SEE just from the postings.- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > Yup I agree, I've been trying to start a few...but. > > So what are you designing/building/testing these days Pamela? > > George H. Good cheap shot at looking for credentials or demeaning the poster. I retired from the technology rat race nearly 10 years ago, and haven't missed much of it at all. I design and build backpacking equipment and test it sometimes for trips lasting a month or two. So what are you designing/building/testing these days George? |