SR/GR use absolute time to synchronize the GPS clocks with the ground clock.
in [Relativity]
|
From: Michael Moroney on 22 Mar 2010 12:46 kenseto <kenseto(a)erinet.com> writes: >On Mar 21, 11:31 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) >wrote: >> So, idiot, why do you dismiss a perceived frequency shift due to the >> Doppler Effect as just the Doppler Effect and ignore the composer's effort >> to compensate for the Doppler Effect as trivial, yet you come up with >> kookiness such as "redefinition of the second" when the designers of >> the GPS system had the foresight to compensate for the frequency shift >> of special and general relativity? All the GPS designers did was the >> very same thing the composer did, to compensate for a physical effect that >> changes the frequency due to ordinary physics. >Hey idiot....the rate of a clock moving wrt you does not change >because it move away from you or move toward you. Accoridng to SR its >rate is 1/gamma at all times. Just like the frequency of the horn on the train does not change just because it is approaching the audience on the train platform. The audience hears the desired tone, 440 Hz. Passengers on the train hear a lower tone, the tone the horn was designed for. GPS receivers receive the proper signal frequency on the ground. Anyone riding a GPS satellite will detect a different frequency, the frequency preselected so that the target audience, users near/on the ground, will receive the proper frequency. There is *no* difference between the train example and the GPS system, other than the source of the frequency shift (Doppler vs. SR/GR). Both systems preadjusted the frequency so that the target audience will receive the correct frequency. That is all.
From: Androcles on 22 Mar 2010 13:07 "Michael Moroney" <moroney(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:ho86t7$19h$1(a)pcls6.std.com... > kenseto <kenseto(a)erinet.com> writes: > >>On Mar 21, 11:31 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) >>wrote: >>> So, idiot, why do you dismiss a perceived frequency shift due to the >>> Doppler Effect as just the Doppler Effect and ignore the composer's >>> effort >>> to compensate for the Doppler Effect as trivial, yet you come up with >>> kookiness such as "redefinition of the second" when the designers of >>> the GPS system had the foresight to compensate for the frequency shift >>> of special and general relativity? All the GPS designers did was the >>> very same thing the composer did, to compensate for a physical effect >>> that >>> changes the frequency due to ordinary physics. > >>Hey idiot....the rate of a clock moving wrt you does not change >>because it move away from you or move toward you. Accoridng to SR its >>rate is 1/gamma at all times. > > Just like the frequency of the horn on the train does not change > just because it is approaching the audience on the train platform. > The audience hears the desired tone, 440 Hz. Passengers on the train > hear a lower tone, the tone the horn was designed for. GPS receivers > receive the proper signal frequency on the ground. Anyone riding a GPS > satellite will detect a different frequency, the frequency preselected so > that the target audience, users near/on the ground, will receive the > proper frequency. > > There is *no* difference between the train example and the GPS system, > other than the source of the frequency shift (Doppler vs. SR/GR). Both > systems preadjusted the frequency so that the target audience will receive > the correct frequency. That is all. Ignorant baloney, Moroney! http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/figures/img107.gif
From: kenseto on 22 Mar 2010 17:05 On Mar 22, 12:46 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote: > kenseto <kens...(a)erinet.com> writes: > >On Mar 21, 11:31 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) > >wrote: > >> So, idiot, why do you dismiss a perceived frequency shift due to the > >> Doppler Effect as just the Doppler Effect and ignore the composer's effort > >> to compensate for the Doppler Effect as trivial, yet you come up with > >> kookiness such as "redefinition of the second" when the designers of > >> the GPS system had the foresight to compensate for the frequency shift > >> of special and general relativity? All the GPS designers did was the > >> very same thing the composer did, to compensate for a physical effect that > >> changes the frequency due to ordinary physics. > >Hey idiot....the rate of a clock moving wrt you does not change > >because it move away from you or move toward you. Accoridng to SR its > >rate is 1/gamma at all times. > > Just like the frequency of the horn on the train does not change > just because it is approaching the audience on the train platform. > The audience hears the desired tone, 440 Hz. Passengers on the train > hear a lower tone, the tone the horn was designed for. GPS receivers > receive the proper signal frequency on the ground. Anyone riding a GPS > satellite will detect a different frequency, the frequency preselected so > that the target audience, users near/on the ground, will receive the > proper frequency. > > There is *no* difference between the train example and the GPS system, > other than the source of the frequency shift (Doppler vs. SR/GR). Both > systems preadjusted the frequency so that the target audience will receive > the correct frequency. That is all. No idiot the audience hear the desired tone only when the train is approaching them. They will hear different tone when the train is recding away from them. You really need to study SR befor eyou make a fool of yourself again. Ken Seto
From: Inertial on 22 Mar 2010 18:02 "kenseto" <kenseto(a)erinet.com> wrote in message news:7fa3e9f3-209d-434b-a1fa-3cd13bf7a810(a)q16g2000yqq.googlegroups.com... > On Mar 22, 12:46 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) > wrote: >> kenseto <kens...(a)erinet.com> writes: >> >On Mar 21, 11:31 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) >> >wrote: >> >> So, idiot, why do you dismiss a perceived frequency shift due to the >> >> Doppler Effect as just the Doppler Effect and ignore the composer's >> >> effort >> >> to compensate for the Doppler Effect as trivial, yet you come up with >> >> kookiness such as "redefinition of the second" when the designers of >> >> the GPS system had the foresight to compensate for the frequency shift >> >> of special and general relativity? All the GPS designers did was the >> >> very same thing the composer did, to compensate for a physical effect >> >> that >> >> changes the frequency due to ordinary physics. >> >Hey idiot....the rate of a clock moving wrt you does not change >> >because it move away from you or move toward you. Accoridng to SR its >> >rate is 1/gamma at all times. >> >> Just like the frequency of the horn on the train does not change >> just because it is approaching the audience on the train platform. >> The audience hears the desired tone, 440 Hz. Passengers on the train >> hear a lower tone, the tone the horn was designed for. GPS receivers >> receive the proper signal frequency on the ground. Anyone riding a GPS >> satellite will detect a different frequency, the frequency preselected so >> that the target audience, users near/on the ground, will receive the >> proper frequency. >> >> There is *no* difference between the train example and the GPS system, >> other than the source of the frequency shift (Doppler vs. SR/GR). Both >> systems preadjusted the frequency so that the target audience will >> receive >> the correct frequency. That is all. > > No idiot the audience hear the desired tone only when the train is > approaching them. They will hear different tone when the train is > recding away from them. You really need to study SR befor eyou make a > fool of yourself again. There was no claim above the SR predict tile dilation dependent on direction of motion .. you replying as if it does just shows that you cannot comprehend simple analogies. The point is, if you know the particular situation (eg train coming toward you, or GPS satellite) you can (pre-)adjust the frequency sent so that it will be detected (heard) as the required frequency by the observer/listener. That is what happens in GPS satellites.
From: xxein on 22 Mar 2010 18:37
On Mar 19, 10:26 am, kenseto <kens...(a)erinet.com> wrote: > SR/GR use absolute time to synchronize the GPS clocks with the ground > clock as follows: > 1. A standard clock second is defined to have 9,192,631,770 periods of > Cs 133 radiation or N periods of Cs 133 radiation. > 2. Before a GPS clock is launched into orbit its clock second is > redefined to have (N +4.15) periods of Cs 133 radiation. This means > that while in orbit a GPS second is defined to have (N+4.15) periods > of Cs 133 radiation. > 3. The reason for the redefinition of the GPS second is to make (N > +4.15) periods of Cs 133 radiation at the GPS orbiting location to > contain the same amount of absolute time as N periods of Cs 133 > radiation on the ground clock. > 4. The redefined GPS second makes the GPS clock in synch with the > ground clock continuously. The only daily adjustment is to correct the > daily drifts. > > Ken Seto xxein: Ever hear of time dilation? NOT the same as Doppler shift. When you figure this out you will understand something more of gravity and motion within it. But I doubt it. |