From: Michael Moroney on
kenseto <kenseto(a)erinet.com> writes:

>Let me expain to you once again: In SR the rate of a clock moving wrt
>you is 1/gamma at all time. The GPS clock sends sends a signal to the
>ground clock after the passage of N+4.15 periods of Cs 133
>radiation....when the ground clock receives this signal it will know
>that the passage of N periods of Cs 133 radiation on its clock have
>taken place.

Yes, just like the train horn. The approaching train has to sound at a
frequency lower than 440 Hz to be heard at the station as 440 Hz, while a
departing train has to sound at a higher frequency to be heard as 440 Hz.

Same effect, different causes.
From: Androcles on

"Michael Moroney" <moroney(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
news:hoarit$alc$1(a)pcls6.std.com...
> kenseto <kenseto(a)erinet.com> writes:
>
>>Hey idiot time dilation got nothing to do with this discussion.
>
> Time dilation has *everything* to do with this discussion. Time dilation
> would cause the GPS satellite to "transmit" at the wrong frequency (as
> far as a terrestial receiver is concerned), so they adjusted the frequency
> before launch so it would at the correct frequency on Earth.

Bullshitting fuckwit!


From: kenseto on
On Mar 23, 12:51 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
wrote:
> kenseto <kens...(a)erinet.com> writes:
> >Hey idiot time dilation got nothing to do with this discussion.
>
> Time dilation has *everything* to do with this discussion.  Time dilation
> would cause the GPS satellite to "transmit" at the wrong frequency (as
> far as a terrestial receiver is concerned), so they adjusted the frequency
> before launch so it would at the correct frequency on Earth.

Sigh...the discussion was about whether observed doppler shift will
effect the rate of a clock. The answer is no. The rate of a moving
clock is 1/gamma at all time.

Ken Seto
From: kenseto on
On Mar 23, 12:57 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
wrote:
> kenseto <kens...(a)erinet.com> writes:
> >Let me expain to you once again: In SR the rate of a clock moving wrt
> >you is 1/gamma at all time. The GPS clock sends sends a signal to the
> >ground clock after the passage of N+4.15 periods of Cs 133
> >radiation....when the ground clock receives this signal it will know
> >that the passage of N periods of Cs 133 radiation on its clock have
> >taken place.
>
> Yes, just like the train horn.  The approaching train has to sound at a
> frequency lower than 440 Hz to be heard at the station as 440 Hz, while a
> departing train has to sound at a higher frequency to be heard as 440 Hz.

No it's not the same. The GPS sends a signal after N+4.15 perods of Cs
133 radiation elapsed....no matter if it is approaching the ground
clock or receding away from the ground clock. The ground clock will
know N periods of cs 133 radiation have elapsed on the ground clock.
With your situation the audience at the platform will hear 440 Hz when
the train is approaching but they will hear a different frequency when
the train is receding away from the platform.

Ken Seto
>
> Same effect, different causes.

From: Sam Wormley on
On 3/24/10 8:27 AM, kenseto wrote:
> Sigh...the discussion was about whether observed doppler shift will
> effect the rate of a clock. The answer is no. The rate of a moving
> clock is 1/gamma at all time.
>
> Ken Seto


Let the clock be a distant pulsar with radial velocity v with
respect to the observer. The relativistic formula for the Doppler
shift in pulse arrival time due to an arbitrary velocity is given
by

t' = (1 + v/c) γ t


where v represents the velocity along the line of sight between
source and observer and t' and t represent the time between
pulses at the observer and at the source, respectively.