Safari 5.0
in [Mac Systems]
|
Prev: WWDC
Next: 802.11n question
From: Jolly Roger on 20 Jun 2010 11:57 In article <tom_stiller-2D17AA.10033120062010(a)news.individual.net>, Tom Stiller <tom_stiller(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > In article <mr-480E52.15554620062010(a)News.Individual.NET>, > Sandman <mr(a)sandman.net> wrote: > > > In article > > <michelle-DCE2E3.05522720062010(a)62-183-169-81.bb.dnainternet.fi>, > > Michelle Steiner <michelle(a)michelle.org> wrote: > > > > > In article <mr-524B35.14410720062010(a)News.Individual.NET>, > > > Sandman <mr(a)sandman.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > In that case, you don't want to print to PDF from Reader (which is > > > > > what the OP, Georg Schwarz, said), but from the web page itself. > > > > > > > > Hey, I didn't realize you could print the reader view - that's awesome! > > > > That part of the thread had been snipped by the time I got into it. :) > > > > > > > > I don't see how this changes anything though, other than the Reader > > > > view > > > > being far more likely to show up correctly in the other end. If that > > > > was > > > > your point, I would have to agree :) > > > > > > My point is that if you're going to email from the reader, there's no > > > point > > > in making a PDF first. > > > > Because the HTML output from the reader is likely to output correctly > > in the other end? > > I strongly suspect that I am not the only person who does not display > HTML in e-mail messages. Add me to the list. -- Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me. E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts. JR
From: John McWilliams on 20 Jun 2010 12:02 Jolly Roger wrote: > In article <tom_stiller-2D17AA.10033120062010(a)news.individual.net>, > Tom Stiller <tom_stiller(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> In article <mr-480E52.15554620062010(a)News.Individual.NET>, >> Sandman <mr(a)sandman.net> wrote: >> >>>> in making a PDF first. >>> Because the HTML output from the reader is likely to output correctly >>> in the other end? >> I strongly suspect that I am not the only person who does not display >> HTML in e-mail messages. > > Add me to the list. OK, you both use Newswatcher. Is it not capable of displaying html? Is there a choice? I don't use, and don't condone folks using html on usenet, but it also doesn't get my knickers bunched. Unless it's done on purpose to annoy. -- john mcwilliams
From: John McWilliams on 20 Jun 2010 12:24 Michelle Steiner wrote: > In article <hvle2o$akk$3(a)news.eternal-september.org>, > John McWilliams <jpmcw(a)comcast.net> wrote: > >>>>>> in making a PDF first. >>>>> Because the HTML output from the reader is likely to output correctly >>>>> in the other end? >>>> I strongly suspect that I am not the only person who does not display >>>> HTML in e-mail messages. >>> Add me to the list. >> OK, you both use Newswatcher. Is it not capable of displaying html? Is >> there a choice? > > Newswatcher is not an email program; it is an NNTP program. Right, but that alone wouldn't prevent a usenet client from displaying html if the author of same so desired. > > Also, it does not display html; it strips all html code completely and > displays only the text. If it does so without any artifacts or bits of code displayed, that'd be a good thing. Or at least, not a bad thing. -- John McWilliams
From: Andrew Templeman on 21 Jun 2010 02:17 Tom Stiller <tom_stiller(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Because the HTML output from the reader is likely to output correctly > > in the other end? > > I strongly suspect that I am not the only person who does not display > HTML in e-mail messages. I am one of them -- Andy Templeman <http://www.templeman.org.uk/>
From: Sandman on 21 Jun 2010 03:48
In article <tom_stiller-2D17AA.10033120062010(a)news.individual.net>, Tom Stiller <tom_stiller(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > Because the HTML output from the reader is likely to output correctly > > in the other end? > > I strongly suspect that I am not the only person who does not display > HTML in e-mail messages. I strongly suspect that as well :) -- Sandman[.net] |