Prev: WWDC
Next: 802.11n question
From: James Dale Guckert on
On 6/7/10 5:49 PM, Michelle Steiner wrote:
> Safari Reader makes it easy to read single and multipage articles on the
> web by presenting them in a new, scrollable view without any additional
> content or clutter.

Just tried that feature out.

"Nifty" is an understatement.

--
JDG
From: M-M on
In article <huk8mj$fvp$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>,
James Dale Guckert <Dipthot(a)Yahoo.Invalid> wrote:

> On 6/7/10 5:49 PM, Michelle Steiner wrote:
> > Safari Reader makes it easy to read single and multipage articles on the
> > web by presenting them in a new, scrollable view without any additional
> > content or clutter.
>
> Just tried that feature out.
>
> "Nifty" is an understatement.


It doesn't always work. Sometimes it just loads the first page.

--
m-m
http://www.mhmyers.com
From: Barry Margolin on
In article
<nospam.m-m-512BDC.23015307062010(a)cpe-76-190-186-198.neo.res.rr.com>,
M-M <nospam.m-m(a)ny.more> wrote:

> In article <huk8mj$fvp$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>,
> James Dale Guckert <Dipthot(a)Yahoo.Invalid> wrote:
>
> > On 6/7/10 5:49 PM, Michelle Steiner wrote:
> > > Safari Reader makes it easy to read single and multipage articles on the
> > > web by presenting them in a new, scrollable view without any additional
> > > content or clutter.
> >
> > Just tried that feature out.
> >
> > "Nifty" is an understatement.
>
>
> It doesn't always work. Sometimes it just loads the first page.

I assume the page has to use particular types of HTML markup that allow
Safari to recognize it as a multipage article. It's not AI.

--
Barry Margolin, barmar(a)alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
*** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group ***
From: Shaun on
James Dale Guckert wrote:
> On 6/7/10 5:49 PM, Michelle Steiner wrote:
>> Safari Reader makes it easy to read single and multipage articles on the
>> web by presenting them in a new, scrollable view without any additional
>> content or clutter.
>
> Just tried that feature out.
>
> "Nifty" is an understatement.
>

Wonder if it would work with multi-page TIFFs?
From: Jim Janney on
Michelle Steiner <michelle(a)michelle.org> writes:

> They also released Safari 4.1 for Tiger.
>
> -- Michelle

[snip]

> Powered by the Nitro JavaScript engine, Safari 5 on the Mac runs JavaScript
> 30 percent faster than Safari 4, three percent faster than Chrome 5.0, and
> over twice as fast as Firefox 3.6.* Safari 5 loads new webpages faster
> using Domain Name System (DNS) prefetching, and improves the caching of
> previously viewed pages to return to them more quickly.

Why do browser writers always brag about JavaScript performance? Does
anyone really care how fast JavaScript runs? I see plenty of
slow-loading pages, but the problems are always bandwidth (the sheer
volume of stupid irrelevant noise people insist on loading their pages
with), network latency, and just plain slow servers at the other end
of the connection. Half the time I have JavaScript turned off anyway.

The DNS prefetching, on the other hand, could be a big win.

--
Jim Janney


 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: WWDC
Next: 802.11n question