San Fransicko, Californica, pontificates with boycotts
in [Design]
|
Prev: Barcode Symbologies
Next: sing-a-long
From: Michael A. Terrell on 26 May 2010 18:58 Jim Thompson wrote: > > On Wed, 26 May 2010 12:35:20 -0700, "Joel Koltner" > <zapwireDASHgroups(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > >"Jim Thompson" <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote in > >message news:5fkqv59pv4b80ufei69413vn8n8fn0spqi(a)4ax.com... > >> In "Tent City" ?:-) > > > >Yep! > > > >> With pink underwear and yellow bologna. > > > >You've got to wonder what kind of guy seems to be more upset that they have to > >wear pink underwear and eat colored bologna than they are at having their > >freedom taken away in the first place. Perhaps being non-Arpaio jails are no > >longer much of a detterent! > > > >I've read a few news stories that Maricopa county does seem to have become > >markedly less criminal under Joe's supervision; kudos to him. > > > >---Joel > > Yep. I know for a fact that undocumented Democrats are fleeing > Arizona :-) Won't Joe arrest their owners for not keeping them on a leash? -- Anyone wanting to run for any political office in the US should have to have a DD214, and a honorable discharge.
From: Jim Thompson on 26 May 2010 21:24 On Wed, 26 May 2010 20:05:48 -0500, flipper <flipper(a)fish.net> wrote: >On Wed, 26 May 2010 08:56:54 -0700, Jim Thompson ><To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote: > >>On Mon, 24 May 2010 21:01:17 -0500, flipper <flipper(a)fish.net> wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 24 May 2010 16:53:27 -0700, Jim Thompson >>><To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote: >>> >>[snip] >>>> >>>>We'll just throw 'em in jail :-) >>> >>>You'll throw 'who' in jail for 'what'? >>> >>[snip] >> >>Arpaio is just now saying on AM radio (KFYI... available via the web), >>"If ICE won't take them , we'll jail them". >> >>It's going to be fun to watch, The Nebbish versus a guy who once ran >>DEA :-) >> >> ...Jim Thompson > >Much as I admire the guy, last I heard there was not yet an Amendment >making him a superceding replacement to the Supreme Court. > >And since only the Fed can adjudicate immigration law I ask again "in >jail for 'what'?" You're dense as a stump. Have you actually read SB1070, as amended, or are you just pontificating, or performing "practiced ignorance"? ...Jim Thompson -- | James E.Thompson, CTO | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | The only thing bipartisan in this country is hypocrisy
From: Archimedes' Lever on 26 May 2010 23:09 On Wed, 26 May 2010 14:33:57 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > > What about the chain gangs? I'm sure there are plenty of roads and >public spaces in Arizona that need 'Manuel labor'. Did you spell that wrong on purpose? :-)
From: John Doe on 28 May 2010 02:20 flipper <flipper fish.net> wrote: > On Wed, 26 May 2010 18:24:55 -0700, Jim Thompson > <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote: > >>On Wed, 26 May 2010 20:05:48 -0500, flipper <flipper fish.net> >>wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 26 May 2010 08:56:54 -0700, Jim Thompson >>><To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Mon, 24 May 2010 21:01:17 -0500, flipper <flipper fish.net> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Mon, 24 May 2010 16:53:27 -0700, Jim Thompson >>>>><To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>[snip] >>>>>> >>>>>>We'll just throw 'em in jail :-) >>>>> >>>>>You'll throw 'who' in jail for 'what'? >>>>> >>>>[snip] >>>> >>>>Arpaio is just now saying on AM radio (KFYI... available via >>>>the web), "If ICE won't take them , we'll jail them". >>>> >>>>It's going to be fun to watch, The Nebbish versus a guy who >>>>once ran DEA :-) >>>> >>>> ...Jim Thompson >>> >>>Much as I admire the guy, last I heard there was not yet an >>>Amendment making him a superceding replacement to the Supreme >>>Court. >>> >>>And since only the Fed can adjudicate immigration law I ask >>>again "in jail for 'what'?" >> >>You're dense as a stump. > > Why don't you answer the question? Just how are you going to > 'convict' someone of a 'crime' you have no Constitutional power > to adjudicate? It does sound strange since no one has suggested that before. Besides, law enforcement prosecutes, it does not adjudicate. >> Have you actually read SB1070, as amended, > Go back and look at what happened to Prop 187. Prop 187 > attempted to bar State services to 'illegals' but the court > ruled it unconstitutional and one reason is because the State > has no power to decide who's 'illegal' as that's a Federal > Power. I.E. The State has no legal basis upon which to deny > services because it has no power to 'determine immigration > status' Which court ruled it unconstitutional? Provide a citation. >>or are you just pontificating, or performing "practiced >>ignorance"? > You can try 'shooting the messenger' all you like but it won't > change the Court and all I did was tell you why I had come to > the conclusion it, at the District level at least, would likely > strike down the Arizona statute: mainly because I investigated > the IIRIRA and what happened to Prop 187. Your idea that illegal immigrant status cannot be determined by law enforcement is just silly, Flippant, in fact illegal immigrant status is determined by lots of different government entities when providing or denying services. -- >> ...Jim Thompson > > > Path: news.astraweb.com!border1.newsrouter.astraweb.com!news-xfer.nntp.sonic.net!news.alt.net!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!novia!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail > NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 22:33:50 -0500 > From: flipper <flipper fish.net> > Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,alt.binaries.schematics.electronic,sci.electronics.cad > Subject: Re: San Fransicko, Californica, pontificates with boycotts > Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 22:30:37 -0500 > Message-ID: <n2orv5liebfq1p4mqa5deh0n51n9he77ee 4ax.com> > References: <5ci8u59pvjah0frgk0eafp5hqjohdhpf1o 4ax.com> <e1blv5th0jfc8813mvlnjcr3i3dpu7lkek 4ax.com> <5b0mv5915rhmg43817q7uif3di1ukgf55j 4ax.com> <3b4mv5dtvjllfkoftg2p6q5mnn0ndfm3k3 4ax.com> <cn5mv551dp2p7s45b73lfe2ufion04bgm7 4ax.com> <10hqv5dcrmc645j5eqfsn6hp8dpunpsq0b 4ax.com> <o4hrv5tsn1attsp0ma2f3d8btur2i0oe9b 4ax.com> <4cirv55jf3ruma3o3mtqesg9rjvn9e2l5m 4ax.com> > X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.2/32.830 > X-No-Archive: yes > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100526-1, 05/26/2010), Outbound message > X-Antivirus-Status: Clean > Lines: 73 > X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com > NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.230.238.182 > X-Trace: sv3-vgV4n3m86UidmSZUiJPK4ejVdfRlEGKbE1mDCzcWwZxlegDpMVm5yB3T48k3xRIvNPfSXMOiBqLMsQH!X3Vtm769CZBoqIR/9dF3avYwtz6Trpid1W+rr7ol140EWGsfyazttelxDhBWyQ5K0EvxTI7XIFN2!Bd2jcp4oYBXVHe+tzA5DKZ3nkZ/+4aK6 > X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers > X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly > X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 > X-Original-Bytes: 4360 >
From: Archimedes' Lever on 28 May 2010 20:37
On Fri, 28 May 2010 17:16:10 -0500, flipper <flipper(a)fish.net> wrote: >There's nothing for your "law enforcement [to] prosecute" if you can't >adjudicate. Deportation does not require a prosecution. |