Simultaneity of Relativity
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: A clock second is not a universal interval of time.
Next: Relativity ring problem - what shape is this?
From: spudnik on 23 Oct 2009 13:22 a "photon" is just a heuriostical device, to pile the energy of the wave into a "point," the place at which the wave-energy is absorbed (by the rods/cones of the eye, or a detectorf). hpwever, Young, Huyghens, Fermat et al showed that all of the important properties are not Newtonian (or corpuscular). > A light wave propagates away from the source at 'c' relative to the > aether. A photon is not emitted from any particular point in three > dimensional space and the travel from that point to its destination at > 'c'. > > A single photon is fired at A' on the train. If an Observer on the --Dirty Harry Potter wants You -- in Sudan et al ad vomitorium! http://wlym.com/~animations/fermat/index.html
From: mpc755 on 23 Oct 2009 13:26 On Oct 23, 1:22 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > a "photon" is just a heuriostical device, > to pile the energy of the wave into a "point," > the place at which the wave-energy is absorbed > (by the rods/cones of the eye, or a detectorf). A photon is described as a quantum of energy. It is better described as a quantum of aether. > > hpwever, Young, Huyghens, Fermat et al showed that > all of the important properties are not Newtonian (or > corpuscular). > > > A light wave propagates away from the source at 'c' relative to the > > aether. A photon is not emitted from any particular point in three > > dimensional space and the travel from that point to its destination at > > 'c'. > > > A single photon is fired at A' on the train. If an Observer on the > > --Dirty Harry Potter wants You -- in Sudan et al ad vomitorium!http://wlym.com/~animations/fermat/index.html
From: spudnik on 23 Oct 2009 13:51 ridiculous; "the aether" is what ever the wave is spreading trhough; htat's teh only question. > A photon is described as a quantum of energy. It is better described > as a quantum of aether. thus: your (The AP's) statement about how Fermat might have defined finity & infinity may actually hover near the heart of the matter of his actual, eventual proof, excluding the very special case of n=4, where he actually defined "infinite descent.: so, how does Fermat's version of infinity gybe with yours?... do you believe that he -- who reconstructed Eulclid's porisms, in the "geometric fragments," below -- did not agree with the infinity of the primes? http://wlym.com/~animations/fermat/index.html thus: in deed, "i.f.f." is just shorthand for N&S. can not one see, easily, that The AP has cpntinuously morphed his proofs, in such a form that he always has N&S, as far as he (and possible instances of "other personalities") is cons=cerned?... then, he tries to communicate them, where it mostly seems to fall-flat into the mud. all that "iff" truly entails is the Trivium, logic/grammer/rhetoric, or just the first two of those, as far as mere Reading Dynamics goes (in other words, pubescent linguacy .-) > A iff B is equivalent to "B is a necessary and sufficient condition > for A." > B is both necessary and sufficient for A, but B is not sufficient; > 'tis only a necessary condition. thus: a "photon" is just a heuriostical device, to pile the energy of the wave into a "point," the place at which the wave-energy is absorbed (by the rods/cones of the eye, or a detector). hpwever, Young, Huyghens, Fermat et al showed that all of the important properties are not Newtonian (or corpuscular). > A light wave propagates away from the source at 'c' relative to the > aether. A photon is not emitted from any particular point in three > dimensional space and the travel from that point to its destination at > 'c'. --Dirty Harry Potter wants You -- in Sudan et al ad vomitorium! http://wlym.com/~animations/fermat/index.html
From: mpc755 on 23 Oct 2009 14:06 A light wave is a wave in the aether. If a light wave is traveling though water, it is propagating through the aether in the water. On Oct 23, 1:51 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > ridiculous; "the aether" is what ever the wave is spreading trhough; > htat's teh only question. > > > A photon is described as a quantum of energy. It is better described > > as a quantum of aether. >
From: spudnik on 23 Oct 2009 14:10
photon hath no restmass, precisely because it is not a coorpuscle -- it am what it am, "least action in least time" a la Fermat! the photon is just a figment of Einstein's photo-electrical effect. Descartes to Fermat Tuesday, July 27, 1638 http://wlym.com/~animations/fermat/august08-fermat.pdf http://wlym.com/~animations/fermat/index.html |