From: andy thomas on
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010, Ceri Davies wrote:

> On 2010-04-15, andy thomas <andy(a)ic.ac.uk> wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 Apr 2010, John D Groenveld wrote:
>>
>>> In article <Pine.GSO.4.64.1004142316480.20369(a)anahata>,
>>> andy thomas <andy.thomas(a)ic.ac.uk> wrote:
>>>> whether these apply retrospectively to existing Solaris installations -
>>>> what is the situation where someone has bought the Solaris 9 media kit a
>>>> few years ago and installed this (or Solaris 10 from a registered
>>>> download) on a number of systems?
>>>
>>> IANAL nor a barrister but I assume that Oracle cannot change the
>>> EULA that you and Sun previously agreed to.
>>
>> That's what I thought. And I assume if I use the CDs from that media kit
>> today to install Sol 9 on another system I have bought on eBay, for
>> example, the EULA that was in force at the time I bought the media kit
>> would still be valid?
>
> Yes, although that EULA probably only allows you to install it on one
> system.

With Solaris 10, when I registered for the download, the web form asked
how many production systems, how many development systems, etc it was
going to be installed on - I assume this was to gather statistics on Sol
10 deployments as I never received any paperwork confirming entitlement to
install it on X production servers, Y dev systems, etc.

Out of interest, does anyone know the annual cost of a basic Sun (sorry, I
meant Oracle) service plan to cover patch and patch cluster downloads for,
say, 15 systems?

Andy


From: John D Groenveld on
In article <Pine.GSO.4.64.1004160510270.22006(a)anahata>,
andy thomas <andy.thomas(a)ic.ac.uk> wrote:
>Out of interest, does anyone know the annual cost of a basic Sun (sorry, I
>meant Oracle) service plan to cover patch and patch cluster downloads for,
>say, 15 systems?

Negotiable.
<URL:http://www.oracle.com/us/support/systems/operating-systems/index.html>

Let us know what the sales critter proposes.
John
groenveld(a)acm.org