From: David Mark on 14 Jan 2010 08:08 Ross Boucher wrote: > On Jan 10, 11:08 pm, RobG <rg...(a)iinet.net.au> wrote: >> On Jan 11, 4:56 pm, Ross Boucher <rbouc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>>> I've seen the demos for the 280 north cappucino (same guys). While the >>>>> code is atrocious, they speak and present well. >>>> I contacted them about their demos (which were similarly dismal) ages >>>> ago. They didn't seem to think it was an issue. There seems to be >>>> something of a disconnect between the public and web personas, perhaps >>>> that is what raises my hackles. >>> Just pointing out this error. Sproutcore and Cappuccino have nothing >>> to do with each other. >> OK. >> >>> Not sure where this "same guys" idea came from. >>> Also not sure if the rest of these comments are supposed to be about >>> Cappuccino or about Sproutcore. >> SproutCore. The only comments specifically about Cappuccino are in >> that last paragraph. >> >> -- >> Rob > > About the demos? I can't recall any conversation we might have had, > but I'll agree with you. We haven't been keeping them up to date with > the framework, and we haven't made the time to create more. What a cop-out. How many "guys" are there? Not one can write a competent demo? And why should you need to "keep them up to date?" It sounds as if your framework is in a perpetual state of flux. And when was it that the demos were impressive? What year and browser(s)?
From: David Mark on 14 Jan 2010 08:10
Ross Boucher wrote: > On Jan 11, 8:49 pm, Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> The similarities between Sproutcore include influence from Cocoa, >> compiling javascript, and variables such as: >> >> var YES = true, >> No = false, >> etc. >> > > The YES, NO issue isn't worth much discussion. I'll give you that. Neither is the rest of it (as I noted my review a year or so back). ;) [...] > ...it's a completely inconsequential part of both frameworks. Well, then lets change the subject to consequences. Post a link to your DOM or event code. We'll get to the bottom of this thing. :) |