Spyware Blaster Database Updated 3|12|2010
in [Spyware]
|
From: ~BD~ on 15 Mar 2010 18:52 Leythos wrote: > In article<0bydnWGKAs7EMAPWnZ2dnUVZ8j9i4p2d(a)bt.com>, BoaterDave.is. > @hotmail.co.uk says... >> >> Leythos wrote: >>> In article<PeudnWZT0eezOwPWnZ2dnUVZ8sadnZ2d(a)bt.com>, BoaterDave.is. >>> @hotmail.co.uk says... >>>> I'm adding *nothing* >>>> >>> >>> That's the first thing I've seen BD say that clearly and perfectly >>> represents his contributions to all of Usenet >>> >> >> It's good to learn that you *do* have a sense of humour after all! > > I didn't include a :) after my comment, it wasn't meant to be funny. > Oops! Forgive me for trying to be friendly <shrug>
From: ~BD~ on 15 Mar 2010 19:05 SeaNymph wrote: > Why not just mind your own business? I *want* Jenn to help. I have asked you, too. > It's between the 2 of them, and they can work it out, or not. If he really *is* a 'bad guy' - that will *never* happen. > Ever think they might enjoy the controversy? I certainly do not enjoy all his lies. You know, as a mother, that nobody would make up a story about losing a child. It's the truth and his mockery of same really hurts. -- Dave
From: Jenn on 15 Mar 2010 20:29 "SeaNymph" <SeaNympy(a)deepbluesea.com> wrote in message news:hnmd2j$ugp$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > Why not just mind your own business? So, why isn't it my business? > It's between the 2 of them, and they can work it out, or not. Ever think > they might enjoy the controversy? True ... then again, it really can't hurt to suggest that people communicate and overcome their issues that make them clash. I'm simply making that suggestion. > Truth is, you rarely ever "know" anybody who posts on a newsgroup. You > might think you do, but you don't. You have no idea who you're talking > to. It depends how long you've known them .. how much information they share about themselves ... if you have contact with them outside of the ngs ... and many other factors. I've met many people in person that I've known online over the years, so a person can know the people they post with on a ng. -- Jenn (from Oklahoma) > "Jenn" <me(a)nowhere.whocareswhatthisemailisanyway> wrote in message > news:hnm9el$vtu$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> "SeaNymph" <SeaNympy(a)deepbluesea.com> wrote in message >> news:hnm57f$5hj$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>> Ah...the beauty of usenet. Where some tout the benefits of being able >>> to say and do whatever you like, then turn around and complain about >>> others doing that very thing. I think it's more of that "what I do is >>> fine, what everyone does that I disagree with is not fine". LOL >>> >>> Ain't life grand? >> >> >> Lots of benefits to posting on Usenet for sure. There is also benefits >> to taking the time to get to know people, and skype is one way people can >> do that, now. It allows people to put a voice, and a face(if people >> video chat) to go with the text they read every day. And who knows... if >> Peter Foldes and Dave(bd) were to voice chat, maybe they could work out >> their issues much quicker? I'm one who believes it's possible. >> -- >> Jenn (from Oklahoma) >> http://pqlr.org/bbs/ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> "Jenn" <me(a)nowhere.whocareswhatthisemailisanyway> wrote in message >>> news:hnm1t2$a0$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >>>> "Peter Foldes" <okf22(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>> news:hnm0ef$lhe$1(a)speranza.aioe.org... >>>>> Just Adding to everyone's answer concerning this mindless cretin named >>>>> BD >>>> >>>> Everyone is entitled to their own opinion regardless whether or not >>>> they are correct. You happen to be incorrect. >>>> >>>>> Boater Dave you are a friggin nut for crossposting your drivel . Give >>>>> us a good reason why you do that. >>>> >>>> Because THIS is Usenet, and he can do whatever he wants to do. Don't >>>> read it if you don't like it. >>>> >>>>> What a mindless idiot you are >>>> >>>> Again .. you are incorrect. >>>> >>>>> Like you wife Thrish said to all of us in her recent post "Please >>>>> excuse my husband he has been found to be mentally unstable by our >>>>> Physicians here in the Devon area " >>>> >>>> Perhaps you should sign up for skype and have a voice chat with Dave? >>>> You could get alot said very quickly on both of your parts and maybe >>>> the two of you could clear up your continual disagreement. Of course, I >>>> really don't expect you to actually take that sort of step in getting >>>> to know someone else that you clash with, but, do you really want to >>>> keep up your disagreement? <shrugs> Some people will never get over an >>>> offence, let alone try to. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Jenn (from Oklahoma) >>>> http://pqlr.org/bbs/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> "~BD~" <BoaterDave.is.(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message >>>>> news:4cSdnTLshPBJ4wPWnZ2dnUVZ8ridnZ2d(a)bt.com... >>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries wrote: >>>>>>> ~BD~ wrote: >>>>>>>> siljaline wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Generally *any* ASAP Board is fully qualified to do HJT Logs. >>>>>>>>> Full list less some that are not ASAP Members are listed here> >>>>>>>>> <http://asap.maddoktor2.com/> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Most folk reading here will no doubt know that *you* are also >>>>>>>> known as Randy Knobloch and that you are staunch staff member at >>>>>>>> Aumha (with 4244 posts to your credit when last I checked) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It may be true that many of us know this. I would think, however, >>>>>>> that if he >>>>>>> wanted that information disseminated widely, he would do it. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Are you suggesting that Mr Knobloch would *not* wish this to be >>>>>> widely known? Why would you think that? >>>>>> >>>>>> Maybe he will explain personally (I'm not holding my breath though!) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please will you explain why Aumha.net is *not* one of the firms >>>>>>>> listed as an ASAP member when, in fact, most folk visit Aumha >>>>>>>> solely to have their HJT logs examined and malware eradicated. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Are you aware of the reason for Aumha being excluded from ASAP? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Have I got this wrong, maybe? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Your whole post is wrong in so many ways, I cannot even begin to >>>>>>> list them. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Oh dear! :-( >>>>>> >>>>>> How will I ever learn if folk do not help me understand the >>>>>> (apparent) error of my ways? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Oh, and why are you trolling this group now? Run out of fish >>>>>>> elsewhere? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm not trolling at all. I'm trying to obtain the answer to what *I* >>>>>> feel is a straight-forward question. >>>>>> >>>>>> Do *you* know *why* Aumha is not a member of the Alliance of Security >>>>>> Analysis Professionals? Does Aumha fail, in some way, to meet the >>>>>> requisite standards of membership? >>>>>> >>>>>> Many of the naive and gullible people who post on the Microsoft >>>>>> newsgroups end up at Aumha - a leading light of same being Mr Robear >>>>>> Dyer (AKA PABear) who is a prolific poster in reply to queries on >>>>>> many of the Microsoft newsgroups. >>>>>> >>>>>> I just cannot help smelling something fishy here. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Dave >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
From: Jenn on 15 Mar 2010 20:37 "~BD~" <BoaterDave.is.(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message news:UaKdnV5Uusz0JAPWnZ2dnUVZ8mGdnZ2d(a)bt.com... > Jenn wrote: <snip> >> umm ... being an intermediary between two men who aren't getting along >> is >> like asking to have my head scalped, and then beat to a bloody pulp and >> doing so voluntarily.<g> It's possible to do, but I could come out of >> it >> more injured than either one of you. :D LOL That's not to say I >> haven't >> been an intermediary before and done so successfully.<g> It takes time >> and there are rules to follow as far as communicating in that sort of >> setting. > > > I'll be gentle with you! :) uh huh LOL but what if I'm not gentle with the two of you? Huh? huh? :D >> Skype will only do 1-video to 1-video .. it won't do video with 3 people >> at >> a time, but it will do a conference voice chat with 3 people at the same >> time, which is kind of cool. > I understand. If Peter Foldes *agrees* to have a video Skype call with > you, and does, it will clear him of any suspicion of being a bad guy. > > If he will not - well, it will simply confirm my fears, eh? ;) Well ... I'm guessing he won't be willing. Many men aren't good communicators.. they prefer the 'bull in china closet' approach and if that doesn't work they move on to the 'let-me-see-just-how-many-buttons-I-can-push' approach which usually involves alot of poking at the other persons hot buttons just to see how much of a reaction they can get. >>> I won't hold my breath! :) >>> >>> If you *do* manage it, then I'm a Dutch Muslim! >>> >> >> haahahahaa ... I dunno.. Dave .. Seems you two have been going at it a >> long time. I'm not saying either one of you is right or wrong... >> probably >> both of you have been right and wrong on occasion. It just seems like >> you >> both are old enough to find a way to get past your differences, but it >> takes >> both of you to get there.... just saying...... it could happen if ya'll >> want it to. > > > Well - he lies; I tell the truth. Simple as that! > It's either that.. or he just resorts to the latter method of male communication that I mentioned above. -- Jenn (from Oklahoma)
From: Dustin Cook on 15 Mar 2010 20:12
"Jenn" <me(a)nowhere.whocareswhatthisemailisanyway> wrote in news:hnm1t2$a0$1(a)news.eternal-september.org: <big snip> Hi Jenn. :) -- "Hrrngh! Someday I'm going to hurl this...er...roll this...hrrngh.. nudge this boulder right down a cliff." - Goblin Warrior |