From: John Navas on
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 16:03:45 -0700, in
<4c33b646$0$22091$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net>, SMS
<scharf.steven(a)geemail.com> wrote:

>On 06/07/10 3:17 PM, Robert Sneddon wrote:

>>Still better than Li-chemistry cells with their high self-discharge
>> rate,
>
>Li-Ion and Li-Po packs are only a little worse than eneloops in terms of
>self-discharge. I.e. in 100 days, the eneloop cells will be around 90%
>and the Li-Ion will be at around 80%. ANiMH would be at around 10%.

The self-discharge rate of Lithium-ion is actually much higher than
that, on the order of 8% per month at 21 degrees C*, but par for the
course with you.

>[SNIP additional nonsense misquoted from websites]

>>> More information is available at "http://batterydata.com/".
>>
>>That's your vanity website, yes?
>
>No. ...

LLPOF -- Registrant:

Domain Name: BATTERYDATA.COM
Created on: 15-Dec-05
Expires on: 15-Dec-10
Last Updated on: 15-Apr-08

Administrative Contact:
Scharf, Steven

*
<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6TH1-3VY0DMT-2&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=1084041787&_rerunOrigin=google&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=ffcd42293ef56e6ec4ff53ce771e34f5>

--
John

"It is better to sit in silence and appear ignorant,
than to open your mouth and remove all doubt." -Mark Twain
"A little learning is a dangerous thing." -Alexander Pope
"Being ignorant is not so much a shame,
as being unwilling to learn." -Benjamin Franklin
From: Peter on
"John Navas" <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote in message
news:i1i7361boqd4vfbcbga95j8jdp2t7tdvfm(a)4ax.com...
> On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 16:03:45 -0700, in
> <4c33b646$0$22091$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net>, SMS
> <scharf.steven(a)geemail.com> wrote:
>
>>On 06/07/10 3:17 PM, Robert Sneddon wrote:
>
>>>Still better than Li-chemistry cells with their high self-discharge
>>> rate,
>>
>>Li-Ion and Li-Po packs are only a little worse than eneloops in terms of
>>self-discharge. I.e. in 100 days, the eneloop cells will be around 90%
>>and the Li-Ion will be at around 80%. ANiMH would be at around 10%.
>
> The self-discharge rate of Lithium-ion is actually much higher than
> that, on the order of 8% per month at 21 degrees C*, but par for the
> course with you.
>


John, I concede.
I strongly suspect you are an expert in self discharge.
From your postings I have seen you do it frequently.
<G>

--
Peter

From: John Navas on
On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 20:39:12 -0400, in
<4c33cd03$0$5495$8f2e0ebb(a)news.shared-secrets.com>, "Peter"
<peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote:

>"John Navas" <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote in message
>news:i1i7361boqd4vfbcbga95j8jdp2t7tdvfm(a)4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 16:03:45 -0700, in
>> <4c33b646$0$22091$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net>, SMS
>> <scharf.steven(a)geemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On 06/07/10 3:17 PM, Robert Sneddon wrote:
>>
>>>>Still better than Li-chemistry cells with their high self-discharge
>>>> rate,
>>>
>>>Li-Ion and Li-Po packs are only a little worse than eneloops in terms of
>>>self-discharge. I.e. in 100 days, the eneloop cells will be around 90%
>>>and the Li-Ion will be at around 80%. ANiMH would be at around 10%.
>>
>> The self-discharge rate of Lithium-ion is actually much higher than
>> that, on the order of 8% per month at 21 degrees C*, but par for the
>> course with you.
>
>John, I concede.
>I strongly suspect you are an expert in self discharge.
>From your postings I have seen you do it frequently.
><G>

Bucking for a spot in the killfile?
A steady stream of ad hominem is the best way to get there.

--
John

'Those who have evidence will present their evidence,
whereas those who do not have evidence will attack the man.'
From: Peter on
"John Navas" <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote in message
news:rhj73613u96ubqsdbhl1gsvp4dgjuc2tpt(a)4ax.com...
> On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 20:39:12 -0400, in
> <4c33cd03$0$5495$8f2e0ebb(a)news.shared-secrets.com>, "Peter"
> <peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote:
>
>>"John Navas" <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote in message
>>news:i1i7361boqd4vfbcbga95j8jdp2t7tdvfm(a)4ax.com...
>>> On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 16:03:45 -0700, in
>>> <4c33b646$0$22091$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net>, SMS
>>> <scharf.steven(a)geemail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 06/07/10 3:17 PM, Robert Sneddon wrote:
>>>
>>>>>Still better than Li-chemistry cells with their high self-discharge
>>>>> rate,
>>>>
>>>>Li-Ion and Li-Po packs are only a little worse than eneloops in terms of
>>>>self-discharge. I.e. in 100 days, the eneloop cells will be around 90%
>>>>and the Li-Ion will be at around 80%. ANiMH would be at around 10%.
>>>
>>> The self-discharge rate of Lithium-ion is actually much higher than
>>> that, on the order of 8% per month at 21 degrees C*, but par for the
>>> course with you.
>>
>>John, I concede.
>>I strongly suspect you are an expert in self discharge.
>>From your postings I have seen you do it frequently.
>><G>
>
> Bucking for a spot in the killfile?
> A steady stream of ad hominem is the best way to get there.
>


I know of nobody who is being forced to read my postings. Do as you see
fit. Somehow I won't feel very punished.

--
Peter

From: Outing Trolls is FUN! on
On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 20:51:36 -0400, "Peter" <peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net>
wrote:

>"John Navas" <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote in message
>news:rhj73613u96ubqsdbhl1gsvp4dgjuc2tpt(a)4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 20:39:12 -0400, in
>> <4c33cd03$0$5495$8f2e0ebb(a)news.shared-secrets.com>, "Peter"
>> <peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote:
>>
>>>"John Navas" <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote in message
>>>news:i1i7361boqd4vfbcbga95j8jdp2t7tdvfm(a)4ax.com...
>>>> On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 16:03:45 -0700, in
>>>> <4c33b646$0$22091$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net>, SMS
>>>> <scharf.steven(a)geemail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On 06/07/10 3:17 PM, Robert Sneddon wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>Still better than Li-chemistry cells with their high self-discharge
>>>>>> rate,
>>>>>
>>>>>Li-Ion and Li-Po packs are only a little worse than eneloops in terms of
>>>>>self-discharge. I.e. in 100 days, the eneloop cells will be around 90%
>>>>>and the Li-Ion will be at around 80%. ANiMH would be at around 10%.
>>>>
>>>> The self-discharge rate of Lithium-ion is actually much higher than
>>>> that, on the order of 8% per month at 21 degrees C*, but par for the
>>>> course with you.
>>>
>>>John, I concede.
>>>I strongly suspect you are an expert in self discharge.
>>>From your postings I have seen you do it frequently.
>>><G>
>>
>> Bucking for a spot in the killfile?
>> A steady stream of ad hominem is the best way to get there.
>>
>
>
>I know of nobody who is being forced to read my postings. Do as you see
>fit. Somehow I won't feel very punished.

Nor will anyone miss out on reading any useful information from you if they
do killfile you. You haven't posted anything useful for anyone yet for as
long as you've been posting. I doubt you're going to magically come up with
something useful in the future as well.

You is what you is. That's not going to change.

"Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped." -
Elbert Hubbard