Prev: Video format converter
Next: Mac Book
From: Tim McNamara on 25 Apr 2010 23:19 In article <sehix-8F5396.14401225042010(a)5ad64b5e.bb.sky.com>, Steve Hix <sehix(a)NOSPAMmac.comINVALID> wrote: > In article <timmcn-89F0F1.15583825042010(a)news-2.mpls.iphouse.net>, > Tim McNamara <timmcn(a)bitstream.net> wrote: > > > In article <hr22ts$9fq$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, > > Phillip Jones <pjones1(a)kimbanet.com> wrote: > > > > Depends on the use you need, of course. > > > > The iPad is just a little too small for what I want. If the screen > > was the size of my 12" iBook, it'd be perfect and I'd have bought > > one already. > > I initially thought the same thing, but having used one (as long as I > can keep it away from my wife), it turns out to not be a problem. > > Screen real estate just seems more available in use than a > similar-size screen running a typical laptop OS. Yeah, it's just that my primary use is peculiar. I am a jazz musician and haul about 750 pages of paper charts around with me when I play. I have about 8000 pages of song charts in PDF format, including virtually everything I have on paper, and it'd be great to be able to carry it all electronically. But the screen really needs to be 8.5 x 11 or very close for it to be practical, and thus far most of the things like the iPad and the Kindle have screens not much bigger than a trade paperback. The iPad could just about do most of the things I use my laptop for outside of work, except for the above which is the most important thing. If they make a bigger iPad at some point it would be a very viable option. |