The Payback for Political Correctness...
in [Design]
|
Prev: esd diodes as diodes
Next: Earbud plug weirdness
From: Joel Koltner on 6 Aug 2010 13:38 "Jim Thompson" <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote in message news:sp8o56p1obeko1ed8sjccvhc25fqhf12ea(a)4ax.com... > They are _all_ pleasantly thin, but well-rounded (except for the > 9-year-old who hasn't developed yet), but not to Hooter's excess. A lot of those Hooter's women probably had a little bit of help from a plastic surgeon... :-)
From: Spehro Pefhany on 6 Aug 2010 13:48 On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 10:38:20 -0700, "Joel Koltner" <zapwireDASHgroups(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >"Jim Thompson" <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote in >message news:sp8o56p1obeko1ed8sjccvhc25fqhf12ea(a)4ax.com... >> They are _all_ pleasantly thin, but well-rounded (except for the >> 9-year-old who hasn't developed yet), but not to Hooter's excess. > >A lot of those Hooter's women probably had a little bit of help from a plastic >surgeon... :-) The ones working at the Hooters Taipei seem natural enough. http://www.hooters.com.tw/product_pic_cs/507_cs.jpg Maybe local preference is for enormous but fake 'things'?
From: Joel Koltner on 6 Aug 2010 13:56 "Spehro Pefhany" <speffSNIP(a)interlogDOTyou.knowwhat> wrote in message news:fiio56po8mpb1q7r920sfhrjnta2o9gv0r(a)4ax.com... > The ones working at the Hooters Taipei seem natural enough. > http://www.hooters.com.tw/product_pic_cs/507_cs.jpg > > Maybe local preference is for enormous but fake 'things'? I've only been to 3 or 4 different ones in the U.S. here -- and all on the west coast... and while you do see a variety of bust sizes, "large C" or "D" seems to be the most common. So not really "enormous," but definitely "above average and noticeable." :-) They do usually have a Twiggy/waif-like woman or two around for the guys who prefer their shapes. ---Joel
From: Paul Hovnanian P.E. on 6 Aug 2010 17:01 flipper wrote: > > On Thu, 05 Aug 2010 19:01:46 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E." > <Paul(a)Hovnanian.com> wrote: > > >flipper wrote: > >> > >[snip] > >> > >> You either have selective amnesia or are demagoguing, or both. > >> > >> Mcveigh's bombing had nothing to do with 'religion' nor any religious > >> ideology, Branch Davidian or otherwise. From his own letter: > > > >Count the number of times he says "Waco" and compare it to the number of > >times he cites any other specific government actions. > > Well, that answers the demagogue question: never let facts and the > person's own words get in the way of a fabricated fantasy. > > Waco was the 'final straw' and the most egregious, just as we tend to > speak mostly of 9/11 and not so much about the first World Trade > Center bombing, embassy bombings, the Cole, and other preceding > terrorist attacks. But you are letting the fact that McVeigh said "Waco" slide while you are imputing intentions of the people who want to build a mosque. If you can find statements from any of the sponsors of the mosque project to the effect that they are building it as some sort of monument of victory, I'll consider your points. Until then, you are just inventing conspiracies and sub rosa plots in your own mind. -- Paul Hovnanian mailto:Paul(a)Hovnanian.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ Telemark: If it was easy, they'd call it snowboarding.
From: Richard Henry on 6 Aug 2010 20:31
On Aug 6, 4:37 pm, flipper <flip...(a)fish.net> wrote: > On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 14:01:00 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E." > > > > <P...(a)Hovnanian.com> wrote: > >flipper wrote: > > >> On Thu, 05 Aug 2010 19:01:46 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E." > >> <P...(a)Hovnanian.com> wrote: > > >> >flipper wrote: > > >> >[snip] > > >> >> You either have selective amnesia or are demagoguing, or both. > > >> >> Mcveigh's bombing had nothing to do with 'religion' nor any religious > >> >> ideology, Branch Davidian or otherwise. From his own letter: > > >> >Count the number of times he says "Waco" and compare it to the number of > >> >times he cites any other specific government actions. > > >> Well, that answers the demagogue question: never let facts and the > >> person's own words get in the way of a fabricated fantasy. > > >> Waco was the 'final straw' and the most egregious, just as we tend to > >> speak mostly of 9/11 and not so much about the first World Trade > >> Center bombing, embassy bombings, the Cole, and other preceding > >> terrorist attacks. > > >But you are letting the fact that McVeigh said "Waco" slide > > I don't know what alternate reality you live in but it's apparently > one without reading comprehension skills as I didn't let anything > 'slide', as opposed to your incessant snipping of any and everything > you find to be inconvenient facts. > > > while you > >are imputing intentions of the people who want to build a mosque. > > And again you never let facts get in the way of a fabricated fantasy. > While there is good reason to wonder about the motives of the Imam > ramrodding the Mosque project I never said one thing about it. In > fact, what I said was "it is not surprising that anything even > remotely smacking of Islam, > ----------> whether 'guilty' or not,<------------- > arouses controversy." > > >If you can find statements from any of the sponsors of the mosque > >project to the effect that they are building it as some sort of monument > >of victory, I'll consider your points. > > Given your fabrication of motives, deliberate amnesia, and inability > to comprehend what's written I doubt whether you're capable of > 'considering' anything. > > Again, as I already explained "The only issue is 'where' and it is my > opinion that, even if one is devoid of common courtesy and > consideration of others, the victims of an attack have the superior > right in determining what shall, or shall not, go in or near their > shrine to it." > > One doesn't need to establish any 'motive'. It's, at the very least, > bad taste and inappropriate, pure and simple. > > Even if we consider the claimed 'motive', a 'reconciliation' center, > it's even more inappropriate. You don't 'reconcile' by sticking your > foot in the door and 'demanding' a place at the victim's shrine. > > Speaking of 'motives', besides a demonstrated bigotry toward > 'Baptists', what's yours? > > > Until then, you are just > >inventing conspiracies and sub rosa plots in your own mind. > > That's your purview. An intelligent person reading your output might determine that you're an idiot. |