The Ruid Concept, with question
in [Ruby]
|
From: thunk on 10 Apr 2010 09:01 On Apr 10, 5:39 am, Xavier Noria <f...(a)hashref.com> wrote: > Please, if you have a concrete, specific question about Ruby, by all > means post it. > > Vague talk about unknown things just does not make any sense. Not > questioning the openness of the software, that is your choice, just > saying there's nothing concrete to discuss and thus I believe this > thread should stop. Thunk has been programming in Ruby for 3 years. The Pick Ax book and an occasional guru talk with a certain "Amazing Ramazian" has answered all his questions so far. Really, and so there is this concentrated set now of 8 modules of condensed Ruby Goodness THAT HAS GENERAL UTILITY. 'AMAZING" general utility in the view of a man that has programmed for over 30 years and has never failed to finish a project he starts. and a man that Loves Ruby. He's sees this GENERAL UTILITY as few beginner programmers may be able to because he "has been there, and done a lot of THAT". dON'T get him started but there are folks that were SHOT in Mexico, there are partners that cheated, there are is some history of PHDs from Hong Kong that then worked for MS, there is a junior programmer that is now in charge of IT for Mitutoyo. There are Who's Who professors.... yup, and software that collected QUALITY data all over the world, no kidding, programming was not invented in 2000 or something kids. IT WORKS, if I was asking questions I would be faking, and i would not do that. I'm frustrated that some folks still want to believe that i'm an idiot, and that there is even a guy that has taken time to drag up really strange things from a Snow Shoe trip, and ready to ignore all the rest - how strange is that. Anyway BOTTOM.BOTTOM.BOTTOM.LINE has been putting his "stuff" out at http://trevoke.net/ruids/ and it is really general and all but it is where he is living, and where it goes or what it becomes is up to you folks. as is, it looks like that might be the end of it. And you guys can all play RubyWarrior and wink yourselves off.
From: thunk on 10 Apr 2010 09:22 Xavior, PS Ol' thunk thinks he sees a "OUTLIER" situation here, folks are connecting the WRONG dots.... and he will tell anybody that he thinks RUBY has let him do things he really did not even expect to be able to do. RUBY has opened barriers of old.... RUBY is the reason Thunk thought this might be an appropriate place to talk about all this. Honestly not to insult folks but here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outlier and again....it seems fair to include this, as there is no SPAM as the author can understand it anywhere. NOTHING! but chats about this whole thing. http://trevoke.net/ruids/
From: Xavier Noria on 10 Apr 2010 09:34 OK, this seems to be generated text.
From: andrew mcelroy on 10 Apr 2010 11:41 On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 9:15 AM, thunk <gmkoller(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Charles, > > 100% of the code is on the table to be available to a trusted party. > > no fees (maybe expenses) IF the right party! but with ND. > BOLLOCKS! I gave you a non disclosure signed. We even talked about it on the phone. I won't do a in person meet up just for a code drop because that's INSANE! I gave you a signed ND so don't pull that line on us. The only thing we have here is a textbook case for how badly broken health care is in the USA. This list is for ruby programming. Your a smart guy so I don't get why this is so hard to understand. I am very rarely this annoyed, but the truth had to be told. I apologize if my language offended anyone. Andrew McElroy > > there are real reasons why this should be so. The author sees a > legitimate > reason for some central control or chaos would reign. > > another reason is that the author is not interested in working at a > "Ruid Central GitHub" > > and there are more reasons! > > > >
From: Seebs on 10 Apr 2010 13:36
On 2010-04-10, andrew mcelroy <sophrinix(a)gmail.com> wrote: >[thunk] >> there are real reasons why this should be so. � The author sees a >> legitimate >> reason for some central control or chaos would reign. Okay, yeah, this guy is mentally unwell. Thunk, if you were for real, you would know that you would have complete control over YOUR BRANCH. Which is all that matters. It doesn't matter if other people want to fork or not; what matters is that you demonstrate, or explain, anything. But you can't, because you don't have anything. Nothing exists. There's just a bunch of fleeting thoughts which capture your attention so strongly that you have to talk about them, but they've never turned into anything which has a real, functional, form. Please see a mental health professional. -s -- Copyright 2010, all wrongs reversed. Peter Seebach / usenet-nospam(a)seebs.net http://www.seebs.net/log/ <-- lawsuits, religion, and funny pictures http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Game_(Scientology) <-- get educated! |