From: thunk on 10 Apr 2010 16:39 > > Andrew McElroy Was confident enough to announce to this group what he thought this was, right? On his side there were kids needing piano lessons, and a SawsAll. On my side, I was in total awe of his understanding of all this and he told me about Python and functions and Google and I made a lot of notes in a 15/20 minute conversation which..... made sense to me. I was ready to drive to Hendersonville to meet him, as, yes, I rather old fashioned about who I trust. Given the way he is framing things that decision, in retrospect, seems like it makes sense. Or? Thunk
From: thunk on 10 Apr 2010 16:47 On Apr 10, 12:36 pm, Seebs <usenet-nos...(a)seebs.net> wrote: > On 2010-04-10, andrew mcelroy <sophri...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >[thunk] > >> there are real reasons why this should be so. The author sees a > >> legitimate > >> reason for some central control or chaos would reign. > > Okay, yeah, this guy is mentally unwell. > > Thunk, if you were for real, you would know that you would have complete > control over YOUR BRANCH. Which is all that matters. It doesn't matter > if other people want to fork or not; what matters is that you demonstrate, > or explain, anything. But you can't, because you don't have anything. > Nothing exists. There's just a bunch of fleeting thoughts which capture > your attention so strongly that you have to talk about them, but they've > never turned into anything which has a real, functional, form. > > Please see a mental health professional. > > -s > -- > Copyright 2010, all wrongs reversed. Peter Seebach / usenet-nos...(a)seebs.nethttp://www.seebs.net/log/<-- lawsuits, religion, and funny pictureshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Game_(Scientology) <-- get educated! Funny you should mention this. Four years ago I was "certified" to be not crazy. And how many of you can say that ;) - No, it is about enjoying the visual and understanding how our minds can work with us and how THEY ARE NOT MACHINES whether we feel like they should be or not. And given a background in Blue Sky research (R&D Kimberly Clark) and a few such things the author enjoys working with and not against the deeper powers. Walked past a book titled something we are all capable of greater things (it wasn't that low key, but I don't want to make this sound too....) BUT in MY day - StepWise was the thing. And I will always try to go to bed with a problem, because I know that 90% plus chance I will wake up with the solution "handed to me" - if you guys really don't believe this happens, well, I feel sorry for you because you are missing something I have enjoyed and found to be a productivity enhancer to the first order. It might explain why I ENJOY programming - it has never been work. As for not existing, well, wanna bet?? I'm serious, anybody really smug and sure enough to take on bet about this stuff??? It exists, and it is doing work of a modest sort - but I cannot think why cannot do much more. And that's just 100% the truth. Thunk
From: H- 16 on 10 Apr 2010 16:47 Seebs wrote: > On 2010-04-10, andrew mcelroy <sophrinix(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>[thunk] >>> there are real reasons why this should be so. � The author sees a >>> legitimate >>> reason for some central control or chaos would reign. > > Okay, yeah, this guy is mentally unwell. > Wow, I find it funny that Think speaks in third person. Thunk, IF you are real then you could alwys just send code snippets, with out revealing all your 'secrets'. But, I don't quite think you'll listen to my (or anyone's for that matter) opinion. I am curious as to why his IP has not been banned yet. He seems to be just spamming and getting everyone annoyed. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
From: Seebs on 10 Apr 2010 16:51 On 2010-04-10, H- 16 <s1ay3r44(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I am curious as to why his IP has not been banned yet. He seems to be > just spamming and getting everyone annoyed. Usenet does not have "IP bans". Under the hood, there is a Usenet newsgroup here, and anyone and anything can post to that. -s -- Copyright 2010, all wrongs reversed. Peter Seebach / usenet-nospam(a)seebs.net http://www.seebs.net/log/ <-- lawsuits, religion, and funny pictures http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Game_(Scientology) <-- get educated!
From: H- 16 on 10 Apr 2010 17:07
thunk wrote: >> Funny you should mention this. Four years ago I was "certified" to be >> not crazy. And how many of you can say that ;) - >.... > As for not existing, well, wanna bet?? I'm serious, anybody really > smug and sure enough to take on bet about this stuff??? It exists, > and it is doing work of a modest sort - but I cannot think why cannot > do much more. > > And that's just 100% the truth. > > Thunk Not to throw dirt in your face but why did you feel you had to be tested? And dude, you are talking like you're just here to annoy everyone. If you're not, then don't drive off topic like you just did. Please? I gave you a simple solution to showus some code, without compromising your work. And many others here have also done that as well, HECK, trevoke even made a site for you to show us this stuff! And that's not something one can do in about five minutes! And I just looked through the site, and I'm still at a loss of why, and what a ruid is. In plan english... what exactly does it do? And please do'nt go way off topic. I'm practically begging you. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. |