"The Science is Scuttled"
in [Physics]
|
Prev: arc of tractrix and circle that are equal (proofs??) #405 Correcting Math
Next: When the Large Hadron Collider goes back online in a few weeks...
From: Cwatters on 11 Feb 2010 08:09 "J. Clarke" <jclarke.usenet(a)cox.net> wrote in message news:hkvmj901taj(a)news7.newsguy.com... > Cwatters wrote: >> "Benj" <bjacoby(a)iwaynet.net> wrote in message >> news:8bf701cb-f6d7-4370-b9c5-604ea2f6c3df(a)a1g2000vbl.googlegroups.com... >> On Feb 9, 12:33 pm, "Cwatters" >> <colin.wattersNOS...(a)TurnersOakNOSPAM.plus.com> wrote: >>> "Mike Jr" <n00s...(a)comcast.net> wrote in message >> >>>> Glaciers have been melting since the end of the last ice age. >>> >>> but not at current rates or they would have been gone long ago. >> >>> Here's a hint SeaWaters. Statistics means a variation. Average rate >>> is not when you take the biggest number you ever measured and use it >>> as if it existed for all time. Truth is glaciers used to be melting >>> MUCH faster and have slowed down a LOT! >> >> Here's a hint Bent. The evidence currently suggests the rate of >> retreat has >> _accelerated_ in recent decades. >> >> http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/jan/20/climate-change-glaciers-melting >> >> "Those changes - the acceleration of the retreat of the glaciers and >> the >> fact that it is a global response - is the concerning part of all >> this. It >> is not any single glacier," he said > > Assuming that that data too hasn't been cooked. > You're free to collect your own.
From: Androcles on 11 Feb 2010 08:34 "Cwatters" <colin.wattersNOSPAM(a)TurnersOakNOSPAM.plus.com> wrote in message news:Z4CdnZTF3_E_nOnWnZ2dnUVZ8lidnZ2d(a)brightview.co.uk... > > "J. Clarke" <jclarke.usenet(a)cox.net> wrote in message > news:hkvmj901taj(a)news7.newsguy.com... >> Cwatters wrote: >>> "Benj" <bjacoby(a)iwaynet.net> wrote in message >>> news:8bf701cb-f6d7-4370-b9c5-604ea2f6c3df(a)a1g2000vbl.googlegroups.com... >>> On Feb 9, 12:33 pm, "Cwatters" >>> <colin.wattersNOS...(a)TurnersOakNOSPAM.plus.com> wrote: >>>> "Mike Jr" <n00s...(a)comcast.net> wrote in message >>> >>>>> Glaciers have been melting since the end of the last ice age. >>>> >>>> but not at current rates or they would have been gone long ago. >>> >>>> Here's a hint SeaWaters. Statistics means a variation. Average rate >>>> is not when you take the biggest number you ever measured and use it >>>> as if it existed for all time. Truth is glaciers used to be melting >>>> MUCH faster and have slowed down a LOT! >>> >>> Here's a hint Bent. The evidence currently suggests the rate of >>> retreat has >>> _accelerated_ in recent decades. >>> >>> http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/jan/20/climate-change-glaciers-melting >>> >>> "Those changes - the acceleration of the retreat of the glaciers and >>> the >>> fact that it is a global response - is the concerning part of all >>> this. It >>> is not any single glacier," he said >> >> Assuming that that data too hasn't been cooked. >> > > You're free to collect your own. I did, Washington DC is snowed under and it is cold here in Britain today. GLOBAL cooling!
From: J. Clarke on 11 Feb 2010 09:18 Cwatters wrote: > "J. Clarke" <jclarke.usenet(a)cox.net> wrote in message > news:hkvmj901taj(a)news7.newsguy.com... >> Cwatters wrote: >>> "Benj" <bjacoby(a)iwaynet.net> wrote in message >>> news:8bf701cb-f6d7-4370-b9c5-604ea2f6c3df(a)a1g2000vbl.googlegroups.com... >>> On Feb 9, 12:33 pm, "Cwatters" >>> <colin.wattersNOS...(a)TurnersOakNOSPAM.plus.com> wrote: >>>> "Mike Jr" <n00s...(a)comcast.net> wrote in message >>> >>>>> Glaciers have been melting since the end of the last ice age. >>>> >>>> but not at current rates or they would have been gone long ago. >>> >>>> Here's a hint SeaWaters. Statistics means a variation. Average >>>> rate is not when you take the biggest number you ever measured and >>>> use it as if it existed for all time. Truth is glaciers used to >>>> be melting MUCH faster and have slowed down a LOT! >>> >>> Here's a hint Bent. The evidence currently suggests the rate of >>> retreat has >>> _accelerated_ in recent decades. >>> >>> http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/jan/20/climate-change-glaciers-melting >>> >>> "Those changes - the acceleration of the retreat of the glaciers and >>> the >>> fact that it is a global response - is the concerning part of all >>> this. It >>> is not any single glacier," he said >> >> Assuming that that data too hasn't been cooked. >> > > You're free to collect your own. Got a grant for me?
From: Marvin the Martian on 14 Feb 2010 12:37 On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:26:37 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote: > On 2/9/10 7:01 PM, Marvin the Martian wrote: took a vote and agreed to > fake lots of photos of > > >> Ice age ended 25,000 years ago. It is stupid to presume that the first >> 24,900 years was due to natural causes, but the last 100 years is now >> "man made". >> >> > It is the rapid and increasing rate of warming in the last decades > that is troublesome. Your favorite fraud, Jones, admitted yesterday that there has been no significant warming since 1995, and that other periods in the 20th century and before have been similar to the last warming period. Seems Jones himself debunked this lie you are telling. Mind you, once again you gibber a lie which, even if true, would be a post hoc fallacy. < snip mindless cut and paste that I've debunked a dozen times before without any comment from this shill. >
From: Sam Wormley on 14 Feb 2010 17:36
On 2/14/10 11:37 AM, Marvin the Martian wrote: > On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:26:37 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote: > >> On 2/9/10 7:01 PM, Marvin the Martian wrote: took a vote and agreed to >> fake lots of photos of >> >> >>> Ice age ended 25,000 years ago. It is stupid to presume that the first >>> 24,900 years was due to natural causes, but the last 100 years is now >>> "man made". >>> >>> >> It is the rapid and increasing rate of warming in the last decades >> that is troublesome. > > Your favorite fraud, Jones, admitted yesterday that there has been no > significant warming since 1995, and that other periods in the 20th > century and before have been similar to the last warming period. Seems > Jones himself debunked this lie you are telling. What's the context of his statement? Cite reference please. |