From: Last Post on
On Feb 19, 10:32 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/19/10 7:03 PM, Marvin the Martian wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hint 2; The IPCC was exposed for telling that lie already.
>
>    I'll bet you have never read the excellent:
>
> Global Climate Change Resources
>    http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr_spm.pdf
>
> Welcome to the IPCC Data Distribution Centre
>    http://www.ipcc-data.org/
>    http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr.pdf

ø Nothing from IPCC is worth a roll of toilet paper
at least from the paper you can get a good wipe.

ø The issue is really irrelevant.
Nobody can control the wind
Nobody can control the rain or snow
Nobody (collectively) can control climate.
Global temps are within natural variations
Oceans heating are a prelude to glaciation
Get used to it!!

— —
| In real science the burden of proof is always
| on the proposer, never on the sceptics. So far
| neither IPCC nor anyone else has provided one
| iota of valid data for global warming nor have
| they provided data that climate change is being
| effected by commerce and industry, and not by
| natural phenomena
From: Sam Wormley on
On 2/19/10 11:43 PM, Last Post wrote:
> � Nothing from IPCC is worth a roll of toilet paper
> at least from the paper you can get a good wipe.
>
> � The issue is really irrelevant.
> Nobody can control the wind
> Nobody can control the rain or snow
> Nobody (collectively) can control climate.
> Global temps are within natural variations
> Oceans heating are a prelude to glaciation
> Get used to it!!


Many of your arguments are addressed and rebutted in this
document:

http://www.swissre.com/resources/2225fb0040c36b1fa49cbfb02e99dba1-Factsheet_Climate_sceptic.pdf

Give it a read and follow the references.

From: Cwatters on

"@B O N Z O" <aaa(a)bbb.com> wrote in message
news:4b7f5b7f(a)dnews.tpgi.com.au...
> Dubious claims about Greenland ice sheet. The IPCC claims that the
> Greenland ice sheet is melting and causing sea level to rise - ignoring or
> misrepresenting research that shows the opposite.
>

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8357537.stm

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gf60NzZ3TfAriwGyYoujhXjN6W1Q

http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/earth20100216.html