The Value Of An Apology, At Least From A Republican's Perspective!!
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: Pittsburgh
Next: Incompatible jpeg?
From: Ray Fischer on 1 Oct 2009 22:24 Neil Harrington <secret(a)illumnati.net> wrote: > >"Savageduck" <savageduck@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote in message >news:2009093010380591745-savageduck(a)REMOVESPAMmecom... >> On 2009-09-30 09:50:07 -0700, "Neil Harrington" <secret(a)illumnati.net> >> said: >> >>> >>> "Chris H" <chris(a)phaedsys.org> wrote in message >>> news:2SeryiCsfwwKFAFF(a)phaedsys.demon.co.uk... >>>> In message <6c-dnXas5sKjMF_XnZ2dnUVZ_uydnZ2d(a)giganews.com>, Bill Graham >>>> <weg9(a)comcast.net> writes >>>>> >>>>> "J. Clarke" <jclarke.usenet(a)cox.net> wrote in message news:h9tef91qgs@n >>>>> ews6.newsguy.com... >>>>>> tony cooper wrote: >>>>>>> On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 23:44:17 -0700, "Bill Graham" <weg9(a)comcast.net> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Be sure to write the first time you encounter a CHP officer with >>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>> idea that you have an inherent right to carry a concealed weapon >>>>>>>> without a permit. I'd be interested to see how that plays out. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have spent many happy hours arguing exactly that with California >>>>>>>> Police officers......My wife's grandson-in-law happens to be one. In >>>>>>>> many cases they agree with my position on the matter. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is the ChrisH School of Reasoning. If you know one person who >>>>>>> shares your opinion, that means "everyone" agrees with you. >>>>>> >>>>>> I had a police officer explain matters to me this way: >>>>>> >>>>>> "If you shoot me when I come to enforce a gun ban, I won't hold it >>>>>> against >>>>>> you." >>>>>> >>>>>> Many police disagree with some of the laws that they are required to >>>>>> enforce, but they do their jobs anyway. >>>>>> >>>>> They shouldn't. "It is the responsibility, not the right, of good men >>>>> to disobey bad laws." - Spencer Tracy, in "Judgment at Nuremberg." >>>> >>>> So how come the US military is still using torture and the excuse is >>>> they were just following orders? >>> >>> No discussion of U.S. military "torture" can be complete without a >>> reading >>> of Ann Coulter's column on the subject, which puts it somewhat in >>> perspective: >> >> I was always understood, that a dinner date with Anne Coulter was an >> accurate description of torture, or cruel and unusual punishment. > >I'm sure that would be true for a leftist-"liberal." They tend to have >foaming-at-the-mouth conniption fits at the mere mention of her name. And yet it is Coulter who accuses people of being traitors just for daring to disagree with the pro-war, pro-torture, anti-American agenda. -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net
From: Neil Harrington on 4 Oct 2009 16:06 How many posts are there in this whole "Value of an apology" thread now, anyway? I'm using Outlook Express and it doesn't tell me that, but I think some other newsreaders do.
From: Ray Fischer on 4 Oct 2009 18:14 Neil Harrington <secret(a)illumnati.net> wrote: >How many posts are there in this whole "Value of an apology" thread now, >anyway? Quite a few that you've run away from. >I'm using Outlook Express and it doesn't tell me that, but I think some >other newsreaders do. Who cares? -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net
From: mikey4 on 4 Oct 2009 18:52 "Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message news:4ac91e60$0$1593$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net... > Neil Harrington <secret(a)illumnati.net> wrote: >>How many posts are there in this whole "Value of an apology" thread now, >>anyway? > > Quite a few that you've run away from. > >>I'm using Outlook Express and it doesn't tell me that, but I think some >>other newsreaders do. > > Who cares? > > -- From the mouth of the sad little man.
From: Ray Fischer on 4 Oct 2009 19:46
mikey4 <lakediver(a)dd..net> wrote: >"Ray Fischer" <rfischer(a)sonic.net> wrote in message >> Neil Harrington <secret(a)illumnati.net> wrote: >>>How many posts are there in this whole "Value of an apology" thread now, >>>anyway? >> >> Quite a few that you've run away from. >> >>>I'm using Outlook Express and it doesn't tell me that, but I think some >>>other newsreaders do. >> >> Who cares? >> >> -- >From the mouth of the sad little man. Why don't you tell us how much money the USPS gets from the government? After all, you claim that it's subsidized. Or you could continue to act like a petulant little child who is angry at being spanked. -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net |