Prev: cleaning copper from steel
Next: A Convenient Falsehood: Global Warming Is a Hoax*
From: Brad Guth on 27 May 2010 19:08
On May 24, 6:07 am, infowolf1 <infowo...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On May 22, 10:04 am, "J. Clarke" <jclarke.use...(a)cox.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 5/22/2010 9:17 AM, infowolf1 wrote:
>
> > > On May 21, 9:29 pm, Brad Guth<bradg...(a)gmail.com>  wrote:
> > >> On May 20, 4:00 am, Jean-Paul Turcaud<montj...(a)sfr.fr>  wrote:
>
> > >>> AT THIS POINT IN PRESSURE,  ANY CRYSTAL IS OF COURSE REDUCED TO A
> > >>> SOLUTION !
>
> > >>> Elementary Dr Watson.
>
> > >>> jpturcaud
> > >>> Australia Mining Pioneer
> > >>> Founder of the True Geology
>
> > >> Zero gravity, so what pressure are you talking about?
>
> > >>   Gravity Force Inside a Spherical Shell (is always zero)
> > >>  http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/HBASE/Mechanics/sphshell2.html#wtls
>
> > >>   Why not a crystal lined geode core?
>
> > >>   ~ BG
>
> > > Regardless of the validity or lack thereof of this application of
> > > hyperphysics which is
> > > at least partly pseudo science anyway,
>
> > You really need to either check out the site or learn some physics,
> > because what they showed was the classical analysis of the gravitational
> > field inside a hollow spherical shell, familiar to sophomore or junior
> > physics students the world over.
>
> > > IT WOULD ONLY APPLY NEAR THE CORE, and the crystals etc. being
> > > discussed are from almost at the surface. the rock pressures etc.
> > > would
> > > still be valid in the first few hundred miles down from the surface.
>
> > It would apply inside any hollow symmetric shell, anywhere inside that
> > shell.  However the Earth is not a hollow symmetric shell.
>
> Is that junior and sophomore college or high school? math wasn't my
> strong
> point and I never finished 12th grade.
>
> My point was, that if there is reduction to zero of gravity as you
> approach
> the core, it is still irrelevant to this true physics daydreamer's
> position,
> because we are talking about crystals and pressures near the surface.
>
> If a dysfunctional mess like me, who clings to objectivity as a
> stabilizer,
> can see through this flaw in logic, why can't this "think for yourself
> -
> meaning think as I say" hollow earth nut case see through this enough
> to stop posting before he starts?
>
> Probably a prior commitment to the hollow earth. (I think an early
> exercize in this nonsense was editorpha, something that seemed
> to be from some psychic source, and hollow earth was part of nazi
> mysticism. Mysticism in general is of doubtful value, with the
> exception of the efforts to attain more precise consciousness of
> Eastern Orthodox Christianity, not blurred out confusing self with
> the universe type stuff from the New Age and so forth writers.
> One thing I figured out long ago, is that there is a certain overlap
> between what the eastern metaphysic and magick and so forth
> considers to be illumination, and schizophrenia. My later
> religious research tended to confirm it.)
>
> Justina

How about considering a 0.1% hollow moon? (or is any kind of hollow
planet or moon impossible?)

What if our moon/Selene turns out being 1% hollow? (much like a large
geode rock that's typically 10+% hollow)

Doesn't our moon/Selene with its offset robust crust of <10% mass,
that's mostly (66%) situated on the back or far-side, have an offset
core of <350 km radii that's 5<10% pulled/morphed towards Earth, in
order to more than compensate for all of that inert mass disparity
caused by the unusually thick crust being heaviest on the back/far
side?

Is anything inside of our moon/Selene fluid, because it's still hot
enough? (I don't think so)

Is the center of 1100 K enough to keep any core rock, iron and thorium
fluid? (I don't think so, because that maximum core heat simply isn't
a big enough volume to count for all that much)

~ BG
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: cleaning copper from steel
Next: A Convenient Falsehood: Global Warming Is a Hoax*