Prev: Nasa mission to unravel sun’s threat to Earth
Next: Wheels fall off global-warming hysteria
From: JT on 4 Feb 2010 11:21
On 31 Jan, 20:48, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1/31/10 1:35 PM, JT wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > You need a skateboard an indoor tablefan mounted sideways on the
> > skateboard replace the fanblades with a single shaft that only reach
> > halfway down to the skateboard, in the shaft end you attach a wire and
> > put a massive bob weight hangin just a centimeter above the skateboard
> > basically a pendulum. With the pendulum and weight in straight down
> > position you mount a 90 degree beam just in front of bob. Of course
> > the beam should probably not raise more then half the bob so it do not
> > get stuck.
>
> > But probably the rig would do better with a motorised beam that can
> > flex 90 degee to let bob pass, and is used in intervalls like a real
> > pulse engine, it should also be adjustable by angle so the bob can
> > gain full speed before impact and do not fully stop after each event.
>
> > JT
>
>    A reactionless drive or inertial propulsion engine (also reactionless
>    thruster, reactionless engine, bootstrap drive, and inertia drive) is
>    any form of propulsion NOT based around expulsion of fuel or reaction
>    mass or radiation.
>
>    The name comes from Newton's Third Law of Motion, usually expressed
>    as: "For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction." Such
>    a drive would use a hypothetical form of thrust that does not require
>    any outside force or net momentum exchange to produce linear motion,
>    and therefore necessarily violates the conservation of momentum, a
>    fundamental principle of all current understandings of physics. In
>    addition it can be shown that conservation of energy is violated.
>
>    F = dp/dt
>
>    No matter how clever (or stooopid) your mechanism is, mother nature
>    cannot be fooled and the conservation laws of Momentum. Angular
>    Momentum and Energy cannot be violated.

What is it all about?
Bumblebees, coldfronts ice ages and spirals. Could you pull a rip
within the ionosphere over a part off world leading to a severe
climate change?

JT

Michaels Bays transformers 2 is interesting.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zz902h6XxR0
From: JT on 4 Feb 2010 11:36
On 4 Feb, 17:21, JT <jonas.thornv...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 31 Jan, 20:48, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 1/31/10 1:35 PM, JT wrote:
>
> > > You need a skateboard an indoor tablefan mounted sideways on the
> > > skateboard replace the fanblades with a single shaft that only reach
> > > halfway down to the skateboard, in the shaft end you attach a wire and
> > > put a massive bob weight hangin just a centimeter above the skateboard
> > > basically a pendulum. With the pendulum and weight in straight down
> > > position you mount a 90 degree beam just in front of bob. Of course
> > > the beam should probably not raise more then half the bob so it do not
> > > get stuck.
>
> > > But probably the rig would do better with a motorised beam that can
> > > flex 90 degee to let bob pass, and is used in intervalls like a real
> > > pulse engine, it should also be adjustable by angle so the bob can
> > > gain full speed before impact and do not fully stop after each event.
>
> > > JT
>
> >    A reactionless drive or inertial propulsion engine (also reactionless
> >    thruster, reactionless engine, bootstrap drive, and inertia drive) is
> >    any form of propulsion NOT based around expulsion of fuel or reaction
> >    mass or radiation.
>
> >    The name comes from Newton's Third Law of Motion, usually expressed
> >    as: "For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction." Such
> >    a drive would use a hypothetical form of thrust that does not require
> >    any outside force or net momentum exchange to produce linear motion,
> >    and therefore necessarily violates the conservation of momentum, a
> >    fundamental principle of all current understandings of physics. In
> >    addition it can be shown that conservation of energy is violated..
>
> >    F = dp/dt
>
> >    No matter how clever (or stooopid) your mechanism is, mother nature
> >    cannot be fooled and the conservation laws of Momentum. Angular
> >    Momentum and Energy cannot be violated.
>
> What is it all about?
> Bumblebees, coldfronts ice ages and spirals. Could you pull a rip
> within the ionosphere over a part off world leading to a severe
> climate change?
>
> JT
>
> Michaels Bays transformers 2 is interesting.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zz902h6XxR0

Would be interesting to know who have, done the overlay of voice
telling it says 45 when they show the symbols.

I think Sam just had another mental breakdown.

JT
From: JT on 4 Feb 2010 12:56
On 31 Jan, 20:48, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1/31/10 1:35 PM, JT wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > You need a skateboard an indoor tablefan mounted sideways on the
> > skateboard replace the fanblades with a single shaft that only reach
> > halfway down to the skateboard, in the shaft end you attach a wire and
> > put a massive bob weight hangin just a centimeter above the skateboard
> > basically a pendulum. With the pendulum and weight in straight down
> > position you mount a 90 degree beam just in front of bob. Of course
> > the beam should probably not raise more then half the bob so it do not
> > get stuck.
>
> > But probably the rig would do better with a motorised beam that can
> > flex 90 degee to let bob pass, and is used in intervalls like a real
> > pulse engine, it should also be adjustable by angle so the bob can
> > gain full speed before impact and do not fully stop after each event.
>
> > JT
>
>    A reactionless drive or inertial propulsion engine (also reactionless
>    thruster, reactionless engine, bootstrap drive, and inertia drive) is
>    any form of propulsion NOT based around expulsion of fuel or reaction
>    mass or radiation.
>
>    The name comes from Newton's Third Law of Motion, usually expressed
>    as: "For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction." Such
>    a drive would use a hypothetical form of thrust that does not require
>    any outside force or net momentum exchange to produce linear motion,
>    and therefore necessarily violates the conservation of momentum, a
>    fundamental principle of all current understandings of physics. In
>    addition it can be shown that conservation of energy is violated.
>
>    F = dp/dt
>
>    No matter how clever (or stooopid) your mechanism is, mother nature
>    cannot be fooled and the conservation laws of Momentum. Angular
>    Momentum and Energy cannot be violated.

And then we have 9/12 spiral, that would be 0.75, is there any
discoveries that put light on any special properties of 0.75 in math,
physics, chemistry newly?

Maybe it was just a demonstration of knowledge of a technology?

JT
From: JT on 4 Feb 2010 14:11
On 31 Jan, 20:48, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1/31/10 1:35 PM, JT wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > You need a skateboard an indoor tablefan mounted sideways on the
> > skateboard replace the fanblades with a single shaft that only reach
> > halfway down to the skateboard, in the shaft end you attach a wire and
> > put a massive bob weight hangin just a centimeter above the skateboard
> > basically a pendulum. With the pendulum and weight in straight down
> > position you mount a 90 degree beam just in front of bob. Of course
> > the beam should probably not raise more then half the bob so it do not
> > get stuck.
>
> > But probably the rig would do better with a motorised beam that can
> > flex 90 degee to let bob pass, and is used in intervalls like a real
> > pulse engine, it should also be adjustable by angle so the bob can
> > gain full speed before impact and do not fully stop after each event.
>
> > JT
>
>    A reactionless drive or inertial propulsion engine (also reactionless
>    thruster, reactionless engine, bootstrap drive, and inertia drive) is
>    any form of propulsion NOT based around expulsion of fuel or reaction
>    mass or radiation.
>
>    The name comes from Newton's Third Law of Motion, usually expressed
>    as: "For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction." Such
>    a drive would use a hypothetical form of thrust that does not require
>    any outside force or net momentum exchange to produce linear motion,
>    and therefore necessarily violates the conservation of momentum, a
>    fundamental principle of all current understandings of physics. In
>    addition it can be shown that conservation of energy is violated.
>
>    F = dp/dt
>
>    No matter how clever (or stooopid) your mechanism is, mother nature
>    cannot be fooled and the conservation laws of Momentum. Angular
>    Momentum and Energy cannot be violated.

Well regarding momentum, once a despotic groups fundings seize and
their military force is overshadowed by others. The only means for
power they really will have is causing havoc and spreading rumours to
cause instability and thereby regain a role.

If this really would be true we will see alot more largescale havoc
within future, to redirect attention from internal problems and also
as alot of tries to change public opinion and create momentum from
fear of economic annectation. And this is a real world problem in our
open economies of course.

So i can see alot of campaigns launched thru media to cause fear in
general public within the near future if my predictions should be
turned out to be correct.

JT
From: JT on 4 Feb 2010 14:49
On 31 Jan, 20:48, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1/31/10 1:35 PM, JT wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > You need a skateboard an indoor tablefan mounted sideways on the
> > skateboard replace the fanblades with a single shaft that only reach
> > halfway down to the skateboard, in the shaft end you attach a wire and
> > put a massive bob weight hangin just a centimeter above the skateboard
> > basically a pendulum. With the pendulum and weight in straight down
> > position you mount a 90 degree beam just in front of bob. Of course
> > the beam should probably not raise more then half the bob so it do not
> > get stuck.
>
> > But probably the rig would do better with a motorised beam that can
> > flex 90 degee to let bob pass, and is used in intervalls like a real
> > pulse engine, it should also be adjustable by angle so the bob can
> > gain full speed before impact and do not fully stop after each event.
>
> > JT
>
>    A reactionless drive or inertial propulsion engine (also reactionless
>    thruster, reactionless engine, bootstrap drive, and inertia drive) is
>    any form of propulsion NOT based around expulsion of fuel or reaction
>    mass or radiation.
>
>    The name comes from Newton's Third Law of Motion, usually expressed
>    as: "For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction." Such
>    a drive would use a hypothetical form of thrust that does not require
>    any outside force or net momentum exchange to produce linear motion,
>    and therefore necessarily violates the conservation of momentum, a
>    fundamental principle of all current understandings of physics. In
>    addition it can be shown that conservation of energy is violated.
>
>    F = dp/dt
>
>    No matter how clever (or stooopid) your mechanism is, mother nature
>    cannot be fooled and the conservation laws of Momentum. Angular
>    Momentum and Energy cannot be violated.

I think the meaning of number 13 have a special connection even in
christianity. In christianity where number 1 is jesus and his 12
deciples and virgin Mary was the mother.

It took quite a different interpretation among the knight templars, i
think their interpretation of it was that there was that the Mary was
the center of worship and number one this is shown even in our days
iconography with Mary.

It was this the ceremonial worship of Mary the church did not approve.
Or rather they did not approve the templars specific ceremonies that
came to their knowledge. Where the 13 was embracing the mother who was
number 1.

This is why number 13 and not 12 was important for templars and is for
masons, they are basically motherworshippers. Well and Joa and Boa
well i leave that for the readers to find out.

So 13/1 well i have no comment, but it do seem to popup in some
historic events.
Of course we could tie all this back to DaVinci, the DaVinci code and
the chalice but that is another story.

JT


First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Nasa mission to unravel sun’s threat to Earth
Next: Wheels fall off global-warming hysteria