From: Just A Guy on
Wheels fall off global-warming hysteria
Activist-scientists cooked the books to foster alarm

Lorne Gunter, Edmonton Journal
Published: Sunday, January 31, 2010

I can't recall the wheels coming off the bus of any expert-driven
hysteria as fast or as completely as they are now coming off the
global-warming scare.

I suppose they must have came off faster from Y2K. At 12:00:01 AM on
Jan. 1, 2000, when airliners didn't fall from the sky and power plants
didn't shut down spontaneously or computers didn't freeze up all over
the world, the air came out of the Y2K scare instantly. Billions had
been spent on preventing that disaster-that-never-was up until
midnight on the final day of 1999, then almost not a penny afterwards.

That is faster than the wheels are coming off the climate-change bus.
But AGW -- anthropogenic global warming -- is a very close second.

News of the manipulations, distortions and frauds perpetrated to
advance and preserve the environmentalists' cause celebre are so
numerous and coming so fast, it's hard to keep up.

First, of course, there were the e-mails and computer files leaked
from Britain's Climate Research Unit (CRU) -one of a handful of
climate-research centres around the world that are the pillars of the
United Nations' claims about impending climate doom. The CRU leaks
showed many of the world's leading climate scientists discussing how
they could torque their research to show more recent warming than
there has been, conceal their "tricks" from other scientists and
government investigators, and pressure scientific journals not to
publish reports by dissenting scientists.

Then a couple of weeks ago came the news that the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the UN's climate-change arm, had based
its most recent findings on Himalayan glacier melt on an old study
that had never been peer-reviewed or even published and which was
based entirely on the speculation (not research) of a single Indian
scientist who now works at the environmental think-tank run by the
head of the IPCC, economist Rajendra Pachauri.

This by itself wouldn't be devastating, except that the scientist in
charge of the glacier chapter of the IPCC's latest assessment report
(AR4) admitted he had known the melt estimate was wrong but had
included it anyway because "we thought that if we can highlight it, it
will impact policy-makers and politicians and encourage them to take
some concrete action."

That's not climate science, it's environmental activism, pure and
simple -- using misleading figures to whip up alarm and bring about
political action.

Another revelation of malfeasance this week was the discovery that the
chapter on Amazon rainforests in the IPCC's AR4, the one that included
the often-repeated claim that 40 per cent of the forest is under
imminent threat from climate change, was written not by climate
scientists but by an policy analyst who works for environmental groups
and a freelance environmental author. Like the glacier chapter, it was
written not to present the latest dispassionate scientific data, but
to present a propaganda case that would produce the policy outcome the
UN and the IPCC want. It confirmed that the UN is a player for one
side in the climate debate, not the source for object facts.

In all, so far, at least 16 major claims made in AR4 (the report for
which the IPCC won a Nobel Prize) have been shown to have originated
with environmental groups rather than scientists, including the claim
that climate change is already making tornado, hurricanes, forest
fires and floods worse.

This week, we also learned that NASA's Goddard Institute for Space
Studies (GISS) may have been playing fast and loose with its own
calculations of global average temperature. Among the four main
repositories of global temperature records, GISS is the only one to
show the Earth still warming during the past decade. Now two American
climate researchers -- Joseph D'Aleo and Anthony Watts -- believe they
know why: Scientists at GISS may have been cherry-picking the weather
stations they take their records from to increase global averages
artificially.

The pair write that there was a "major" decline in the number of
stations GISS scientists were taking readings from "and an increase in
missing data from remaining stations, which occurred suddenly around
1990 ... a clear bias was found toward removing higher elevation,
higher latitude, and rural stations -- the cooler stations -- during
this culling process." The pre-1990 temperature records, though,
continued to include these cooler stations. These changes tended to
make temperatures before 1990 appear extra-cool and those after 1990
extra-warm.

This probably shouldn't surprise -- GISS is run by James Hansen, the
scientist who first set off the global-warming scare in 1988 and who
is an adviser to former U.S. vice-president Al Gore.

Hansen has testified in court on behalf of eco-vandals charged with
damaging a British power plant, insisting they are guilty of no crime
because they were acting in defence of humanity and he has called coal
trains "death trains" and coal-fired power plants "factories of
death."

Again, those are the words of an activist, not a scientist.

Does all this prove global warming is a hoax?

I believe it does.

But at the least, it shows the science is far from settled.
From: Sam Wormley on
On 2/1/10 12:25 AM, Just A Guy wrote:

>
> Does all this prove global warming is a hoax?
>
> I believe it does.
>

Now your have to come up with some other explanation
for all that ice melting and global sea level rise. :-o

From: matt_sykes on
On 1 Feb, 07:39, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/1/10 12:25 AM, Just A Guy wrote:
>
>
>
> > Does all this prove global warming is a hoax?
>
> > I believe it does.
>
>    Now your have to come up with some other explanation
>    for all that ice melting and global sea level rise.  :-o

Global sea ice isnt changing.
From: Bill Ward on
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 23:49:37 -0800, matt_sykes wrote:

> On 1 Feb, 07:39, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 2/1/10 12:25 AM, Just A Guy wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > Does all this prove global warming is a hoax?
>>
>> > I believe it does.
>>
>>    Now your have to come up with some other explanation for all that
>>    ice melting and global sea level rise.  :-o
>
> Global sea ice isnt changing.

AGWers don't yet realize it's not the sea level that's rising - it's
their ship that's sinking.


From: Richard Henry on
On Jan 31, 11:49 pm, matt_sykes <zzeb...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 1 Feb, 07:39, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 2/1/10 12:25 AM, Just A Guy wrote:
>
> > > Does all this prove global warming is a hoax?
>
> > > I believe it does.
>
> >    Now your have to come up with some other explanation
> >    for all that ice melting and global sea level rise.  :-o
>
> Global sea ice isnt changing.

http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/global.daily.ice.area.withtrend.jpg