The inertial propelled buttkicker
in [Physics]
|
From: JT on 31 Jan 2010 14:35 You need a skateboard an indoor tablefan mounted sideways on the skateboard replace the fanblades with a single shaft that only reach halfway down to the skateboard, in the shaft end you attach a wire and put a massive bob weight hangin just a centimeter above the skateboard basically a pendulum. With the pendulum and weight in straight down position you mount a 90 degree beam just in front of bob. Of course the beam should probably not raise more then half the bob so it do not get stuck. But probably the rig would do better with a motorised beam that can flex 90 degee to let bob pass, and is used in intervalls like a real pulse engine, it should also be adjustable by angle so the bob can gain full speed before impact and do not fully stop after each event. JT
From: Sam Wormley on 31 Jan 2010 14:48 On 1/31/10 1:35 PM, JT wrote: > You need a skateboard an indoor tablefan mounted sideways on the > skateboard replace the fanblades with a single shaft that only reach > halfway down to the skateboard, in the shaft end you attach a wire and > put a massive bob weight hangin just a centimeter above the skateboard > basically a pendulum. With the pendulum and weight in straight down > position you mount a 90 degree beam just in front of bob. Of course > the beam should probably not raise more then half the bob so it do not > get stuck. > > But probably the rig would do better with a motorised beam that can > flex 90 degee to let bob pass, and is used in intervalls like a real > pulse engine, it should also be adjustable by angle so the bob can > gain full speed before impact and do not fully stop after each event. > > JT > A reactionless drive or inertial propulsion engine (also reactionless thruster, reactionless engine, bootstrap drive, and inertia drive) is any form of propulsion NOT based around expulsion of fuel or reaction mass or radiation. The name comes from Newton's Third Law of Motion, usually expressed as: "For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction." Such a drive would use a hypothetical form of thrust that does not require any outside force or net momentum exchange to produce linear motion, and therefore necessarily violates the conservation of momentum, a fundamental principle of all current understandings of physics. In addition it can be shown that conservation of energy is violated. F = dp/dt No matter how clever (or stooopid) your mechanism is, mother nature cannot be fooled and the conservation laws of Momentum. Angular Momentum and Energy cannot be violated.
From: JT on 31 Jan 2010 14:56 On 31 Jan, 20:48, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 1/31/10 1:35 PM, JT wrote: > > > > > > > You need a skateboard an indoor tablefan mounted sideways on the > > skateboard replace the fanblades with a single shaft that only reach > > halfway down to the skateboard, in the shaft end you attach a wire and > > put a massive bob weight hangin just a centimeter above the skateboard > > basically a pendulum. With the pendulum and weight in straight down > > position you mount a 90 degree beam just in front of bob. Of course > > the beam should probably not raise more then half the bob so it do not > > get stuck. > > > But probably the rig would do better with a motorised beam that can > > flex 90 degee to let bob pass, and is used in intervalls like a real > > pulse engine, it should also be adjustable by angle so the bob can > > gain full speed before impact and do not fully stop after each event. > > > JT > > A reactionless drive or inertial propulsion engine (also reactionless > thruster, reactionless engine, bootstrap drive, and inertia drive) is > any form of propulsion NOT based around expulsion of fuel or reaction > mass or radiation. > > The name comes from Newton's Third Law of Motion, usually expressed > as: "For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction." Such > a drive would use a hypothetical form of thrust that does not require > any outside force or net momentum exchange to produce linear motion, > and therefore necessarily violates the conservation of momentum, a > fundamental principle of all current understandings of physics. In > addition it can be shown that conservation of energy is violated. > > F = dp/dt > > No matter how clever (or stooopid) your mechanism is, mother nature > cannot be fooled and the conservation laws of Momentum. Angular > Momentum and Energy cannot be violated.- Dölj citerad text - > > - Visa citerad text - Well then you have to prove that the acceleration of the bob will move it backwards. I am keen too see that because it would make ineratial so much easier, wouldn't it....... I mean we just have to accelerate something angular to get linear mometum. And that certainly would be convenient because we could just slowly flip the field in and out 90 degrees. By tilting ***the fan*** to use the acceleration again and again. JT JT
From: Sam Wormley on 31 Jan 2010 21:10 On 1/31/10 1:35 PM, JT wrote: > You need a skateboard an indoor tablefan mounted sideways on the > skateboard replace the fanblades with a single shaft that only reach > halfway down to the skateboard, in the shaft end you attach a wire and > put a massive bob weight hangin just a centimeter above the skateboard > basically a pendulum. With the pendulum and weight in straight down > position you mount a 90 degree beam just in front of bob. Of course > the beam should probably not raise more then half the bob so it do not > get stuck. > > But probably the rig would do better with a motorised beam that can > flex 90 degee to let bob pass, and is used in intervalls like a real > pulse engine, it should also be adjustable by angle so the bob can > gain full speed before impact and do not fully stop after each event. > > JT > A reactionless drive or inertial propulsion engine (also reactionless thruster, reactionless engine, bootstrap drive, and inertia drive) is any form of propulsion NOT based around expulsion of fuel or reaction mass or radiation. The name comes from Newton's Third Law of Motion, usually expressed as: "For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction." Such a drive would use a hypothetical form of thrust that does not require any outside force or net momentum exchange to produce linear motion, and therefore necessarily violates the conservation of momentum, a fundamental principle of all current understandings of physics. In addition it can be shown that conservation of energy is violated. F = dp/dt No matter how clever (or stooopid) your mechanism is, mother nature cannot be fooled and the conservation laws of Momentum. Angular Momentum and Energy cannot be violated.
From: JT on 1 Feb 2010 12:44 On 31 Jan, 20:48, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 1/31/10 1:35 PM,JTwrote: > > > > > > > You need a skateboard an indoor tablefan mounted sideways on the > > skateboard replace the fanblades with a single shaft that only reach > > halfway down to the skateboard, in the shaft end you attach a wire and > > put a massive bob weight hangin just a centimeter above the skateboard > > basically a pendulum. With the pendulum and weight in straight down > > position you mount a 90 degree beam just in front of bob. Of course > > the beam should probably not raise more then half the bob so it do not > > get stuck. > > > But probably the rig would do better with a motorised beam that can > > flex 90 degee to let bob pass, and is used in intervalls like a real > > pulse engine, it should also be adjustable by angle so the bob can > > gain full speed before impact and do not fully stop after each event. > > >JT > > A reactionless drive or inertial propulsion engine (also reactionless > thruster, reactionless engine, bootstrap drive, and inertia drive) is > any form of propulsion NOT based around expulsion of fuel or reaction > mass or radiation. > > The name comes from Newton's Third Law of Motion, usually expressed > as: "For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction." Such > a drive would use a hypothetical form of thrust that does not require > any outside force or net momentum exchange to produce linear motion, > and therefore necessarily violates the conservation of momentum, a > fundamental principle of all current understandings of physics. In > addition it can be shown that conservation of energy is violated. > > F = dp/dt > > No matter how clever (or stooopid) your mechanism is, mother nature > cannot be fooled and the conservation laws of Momentum. Angular > Momentum and Energy cannot be violated.- Dölj citerad text - > > - Visa citerad text - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6A-JYbu1Os
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Nasa mission to unravel sun’s threat to Earth Next: Wheels fall off global-warming hysteria |