From: Michael Gordge on
On Feb 14, 11:41 pm, Andrew Usher <k_over_hb...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> What this is is 'not even wrong' i.e. its premisses are so far off
> base that it can't even be argued against sensibly.

It's the premise of capitalism that can not be argue against, and so
because ewe cant, ewe choose to attack me and not the subject being
debated, typical behaviour of ewe lefturd retards.

Capitalism is based upon and is utterly impotent without, the premise
of private ownership, begining at you / your life / your body - based
on facts of reality, that life is a self generating self sustaining
form of existence, you breath your air, you digest your food, your
energy can only be activated by your mind, therefore you are the owner
and you are therefore responsible for the results of your energy which
can only be initiated by your mind.

You didn't answer, why dont you want to be held responsible for the
results of your energy?

MG
From: Michael Gordge on
On Feb 17, 3:39 am, Sam <saxon...(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

> That wouldn't be a bad philosophy to follow if it wasn't for the fact
> that only a few are allowed to be greedy.

Picking winners you mean, that's called cronyism and both left and
right wing governments enage in it by inventing laws, regulations
tariffs, e.g. minimum wage laws allow the non-productive to become
greedy without fear, whereas for capitalist politics, fear is a
requirement to keep greed in check.

Greed as a vice (leftism / socialism / fascism / rightism)

Verses

Greed as a virtue (capitalism)

MG
From: Andrew Usher on
Sam wrote:

> > The common masses are very much in the dark about what is
> > the true situation on Earth.
> > The Intelligence of Earth only allows them to know what they
> > think they should know.
> >
> > THE BORG
>
> This issue would probably go over his head. Most liberal/leftist
> types have an in-built firewall that renders the cognitive domain
> pretty much useless.

Your 'cognitive domain' is not working properly if you uncritically
accept such unsupported conspiracy theories.

Andrew Usher
From: Andrew Usher on
Michael Gordge wrote:
> On Feb 14, 11:41 pm, Andrew Usher <k_over_hb...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > What this is is 'not even wrong' i.e. its premisses are so far off
> > base that it can't even be argued against sensibly.
>
> It's the premise of capitalism that can not be argue against, and so
> because ewe cant, ewe choose to attack me and not the subject being
> debated, typical behaviour of ewe lefturd retards.

See what I said about this guy not even reading my posts !

Andrew Usher
From: Andrew Usher on
Sam wrote:

> > They don't exist. I'm sure the real elites are fine with us believing
> > in junk like that, though.
>
> You talk about base arguments and you come out with that clanger.
>
> Who are the real elites?
>
> How do they operate?

Read my first post, and perhaps previous posts by me. Then use your
brain, if you can.

Andrew Usher