The mafia
in [Math]
|
Prev: Is there some lower bound on the smallest eigenvalue of a n-by-n matrix?
Next: --- --- --- an equation with several variables
From: adamk on 18 Feb 2010 07:19 > On Feb 18, 11:04 am, Bacle <ba...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Figure out the difference between a statement and > an argument. > > Thats a bit rich comeing from a regurgitating Kantian > retard like ewe. Really.?. He did not state his position, he only criticized yours, and what he sees as a lack of arguments --and I agree with him. You have not presented anything other than tautologies. You have no real basis for calling him Kantian, nor anything else > > MG
From: Michael Gordge on 19 Feb 2010 01:33 On Feb 19, 7:19 am, adamk <ad...(a)adamk.net> wrote: > Really.?. Yes really. > He did not state his position, Cowards never do, so one has to take a guess and given the overwhelming evidence he's as Kantian as ewe Kantians ever get. > he only criticized yours, and what he sees as a lack of > arguments --and I agree with him. But of course being Kantian ewe can not and do not want to say what is missing from the argument that, life is a self generating self sustaining form of existence and that your actions can only be generated by your mind, therefore you are the only possible owner of those actions and therefore only you can be held responsible for them, so why dont you explain why you do not want to be the owner and therefore be held responsible for your ideas and actions, to do with as you choose, e.g. why dont ewe want to engage in free trade and or leave others alone so as they can? MG
From: Aatu Koskensilta on 19 Feb 2010 10:34 Michael Gordge <mikegordge(a)xtra.co.nz> writes: > Cowards never do, so one has to take a guess and given the > overwhelming evidence he's as Kantian as ewe Kantians ever get. Kant this and Kant that. All this Kant cant is very silly. Perhaps you could take it to a more appropriate newsgroup? -- Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta(a)uta.fi) "Wovon man nicht sprechan kann, dar�ber muss man schweigen" - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
From: James Burns on 19 Feb 2010 10:43 Aatu Koskensilta wrote: > Michael Gordge <mikegordge(a)xtra.co.nz> writes: > >>Cowards never do, so one has to take a guess >>and given the overwhelming evidence >>he's as Kantian as ewe Kantians ever get. > > Kant this and Kant that. All this Kant cant > is very silly. Perhaps you could take it > to a more appropriate newsgroup? Perhaps he can't.
From: Michael Gordge on 19 Feb 2010 16:34
On Feb 19, 7:15 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > lets compromise upon > 'social capitalism ' ! compromise with an oxymoron, ewe cant be serious. MG |