The mafia
in [Math]
|
Prev: Is there some lower bound on the smallest eigenvalue of a n-by-n matrix?
Next: --- --- --- an equation with several variables
From: Darwin123 on 17 Feb 2010 21:47 On Feb 17, 6:21 pm, Andrew Usher <k_over_hb...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Darwin123 wrote: > > On Feb 16, 9:58 pm, Andrew Usher <k_over_hb...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > The difference with women and blacks > > > > is that in their present form they are not really a threat to the > > > > existing economic system, largely because they're having to fight > > > > against social as well as economic oppression. > > > You are a National Socialist! I sensed it from the beginning, but > > wasn't sure > > Excellent posting, dimwit! You are attempting to call me a 'National > Socialist', but only quoted another poster! Who, Lorentz? That's me, too. It's not a sock puppet. I messed up when I joined Google. The software sometimes lists me as Darwin123, and sometimes as Lorentz. > > In any case, it's nothing but a typical leftist tactic to scream > 'Nazi' at views that challenge their dogmas. Your position on science are based on your insecurities concerning race, not on logic or profit. It is not precisely Fascism. However, it is a convincing facsimile. > > Andrew Usher
From: Immortalist on 17 Feb 2010 22:12 On Feb 17, 10:45 am, Darwin123 <drosen0...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Feb 16, 9:58 pm, Andrew Usher <k_over_hb...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > The difference with women and blacks > > > is that in their present form they are not really a threat to the > > > existing economic system, largely because they're having to fight > > > against social as well as economic oppression. > > You are a National Socialist! I sensed it from the beginning, but > wasn't sure. National socialists prefer giving more freedom and rights to corporations than the people. Leftists and communitarians are more concerned about the rights of individuals over corperatism. Fascism is an authoritarian political ideology (generally tied to a mass movement) that considers individual and other societal interests subordinate to the needs of the state, and seeks to forge a type of national unity, usually based on, but not limited to, ethnic, cultural, or racial attributes. Various scholars attribute different characteristics to fascism, but the following elements are usually seen as its integral parts: nationalism, authoritarianism, statism, militarism, totalitarianism, anti-communism, collectivism, corporatism, populism, and opposition to economic and political liberalism. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism Historically, corporatism or corporativism (Italian: corporativismo) refers to a political or economic system in which power is given to civic assemblies that represent economic, industrial, agrarian, social, cultural, and professional groups. These civic assemblies, known as corporations (not necessarily in the same sense as contemporary business corporations) are unelected bodies with an internal hierarchy; their purpose is to exert control over their respective areas of social or economic life. Thus, for example, a steel corporation would be a cartel composed of all the business leaders in the steel industry, coming together to discuss a common policy on prices and wages. When much political and economic power rests in the hands of such groups, then a corporatist system is in place.... ....Political scientists may also use the term corporatism to describe a practice whereby an authoritarian state, through the process of licensing and regulating officially-incorporated social, religious, economic, or popular organizations, effectively co-opts their leadership or circumscribes their ability to challenge state authority by establishing the state as the source of their legitimacy, as well as sometimes running them, either directly or indirectly through shill corporations. This usage is particularly common in the area of East Asian studies, and is sometimes also referred to as state corporatism. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporatism
From: Michael Gordge on 18 Feb 2010 02:31 On Feb 18, 12:34 pm, Bappa <banerjeeadda1...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > When great-great individualists nevertheless have to depend upon > others for their survival (someone else does their food gathering, > they just havr to pay) the situation is ultimately always > socialistic, like it or not. There is nothing socialistic in you being left free and alone to be the sole benefactor and the sole decider of the results of your energy, idiot. MG
From: Michael Gordge on 18 Feb 2010 16:41 On Feb 18, 11:26 am, Bacle <ba...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > Usher, just like gordge, deserves nothing but contempt. Ewe confused knuckle-dragging Kantians are a joke. MG
From: Michael Gordge on 18 Feb 2010 16:42
On Feb 18, 11:04 am, Bacle <ba...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Figure out the difference between a statement and an argument. Thats a bit rich comeing from a regurgitating Kantian retard like ewe. MG |