From: Bob Myers on
Andrew Usher wrote:

>
> SI units make sense? I myself never really understood EM until I saw
> the formulae presented in proper units (see Section IIX of my essay).

If the units made a difference to your degree of understanding
of EM, I would suggest that your understanding isn't all that
good.

Bob M.


From: Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr. on
On Feb 8, 3:57 am, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_u> wrote:
> "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum...(a)pants.btinternet.com> wrote in message
>
> news:Fp6dnUqcaKLOb_LWnZ2dnUVZ8hSdnZ2d(a)bt.com...
>
> > Androcles wrote:
> >> "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum...(a)pants.btinternet.com> wrote in message
> >>news:8KednRJawL4zTPLWnZ2dnUVZ8nidnZ2d(a)bt.com...
> >>> Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr. wrote:
> >>>> I totally agree. Traditional Imperial units are simple and natural:
>
> >>>> 1 furlong = 660 feet
> >>>> 1 mile = 5280 feet
> >>>> 1 fathom = 6.08 feet
>
> >>>> 1 acre = 43,560 sq feet
>
> >>>> 1 pound = 16 oz
>
> >>> Only in avoirdupois weights.  In troy weights, 12 ounces = 1 pound.
> >>> Avoirdupois ounces are lighter than troy ounces.  Complicated?  You
> >>> bet. Troy weights are most usually used for gold and silver,
> >>> avoirdupois for most everything else.
>
> >>> Thus the old riddle, "Which weighs more, a pound of feathers or a
> >>> pound of gold?"  The clear answer is a pound of feathers, weighed in
> >>> avoirdupois (453.6 gm), while a pound of gold is 373.2 gm.
>
> >>>> 1 stone = 14 pounds
> >>>> 1 hundredweight  = 112 pounds
> >>>> 1 ton  = 2240 pounds
>
> >>> That's a "long ton" or English equivalent to a metric tonne of 1000
> >>> kg. The usual Imperial ton is 2,000 pounds, I think.
> >> =================================================
> >> Back-arsewards... the Imperial ton is 20 cwt = 2240 lbs, the unusual
> >> American
> >> short ton is 2000 lbs. Not many years ago a British billion was a
> >> million million, not the thousand million that it has since become.
>
> > So there are three ways of looking at tons:
>
> > Imperial 2240 lb (1016 kg, I should have checked)
> > Metric  1000 kg
> > USA/Canada 2000 lb (907 kg)
>
> ===============================================
> I suspect the little red schoolhouses of the colonial backwoods
> confused the hundredweight (cwt) with a 100 lbs and by multiplying
> that by 20 arrived at the short ton.
> The tun is a large barrel, of course.
>    http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1005/1428697981_1cfdd49674.jpg
>    http://www.picturesofengland.com/img/L/1020188.jpg
>
> An imperial gallon of water weighs 10 lb, an American short gallon
> weighs ~ 8.33-8.35 lb. Thus American cars get fewer mpg.
>
>  US liquid gallons
>    1 MPG ~ 0.425 km/l
>    235/MPG ~ l/100 km
>    1 MPG ~ 1.201 MPG (Imp)
>  Imperial gallons (UK)
>    1 MPG ~ 0.354 km/l
>    282/MPG ~ l/100 km
>    1 MPG ~ 0.833 MPG (US)
> What is extremely unlikely is the Americans changing the mile,
> their roads are laid out in a 1 mile grid all over the Great Plains
> as you can see using Google Earth.
> The word "mile" comes from the Latin "mille" and was a thousand
> paces by marching Roman troops.
>

That's 1.6 meters per step? Quite impressive!
From: Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr. on
On Feb 8, 6:03 am, Andrew Usher <k_over_hb...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Feb 8, 5:57 am, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_u> wrote:
>
> > ===============================================
> > I suspect the little red schoolhouses of the colonial backwoods
> > confused the hundredweight (cwt) with a 100 lbs and by multiplying
> > that by 20 arrived at the short ton.
> > The tun is a large barrel, of course.
> >    http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1005/1428697981_1cfdd49674.jpg
> >    http://www.picturesofengland.com/img/L/1020188.jpg
>
> In fact, a tun of water is about 2100 lb - in between the American and
> British values.
>

Yes, that's one of the beauties of the Imperial system: each term can
mean dozens of different things.

From: Androcles on

"Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr." <ostap_bender_1900(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:0d8382e6-b25b-4caa-8b36-8b7c02e25b85(a)s25g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 8, 3:57 am, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_u> wrote:
> "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum...(a)pants.btinternet.com> wrote in message
>
> news:Fp6dnUqcaKLOb_LWnZ2dnUVZ8hSdnZ2d(a)bt.com...
>
> > Androcles wrote:
> >> "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum...(a)pants.btinternet.com> wrote in message
> >>news:8KednRJawL4zTPLWnZ2dnUVZ8nidnZ2d(a)bt.com...
> >>> Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr. wrote:
> >>>> I totally agree. Traditional Imperial units are simple and natural:
>
> >>>> 1 furlong = 660 feet
> >>>> 1 mile = 5280 feet
> >>>> 1 fathom = 6.08 feet
>
> >>>> 1 acre = 43,560 sq feet
>
> >>>> 1 pound = 16 oz
>
> >>> Only in avoirdupois weights. In troy weights, 12 ounces = 1 pound.
> >>> Avoirdupois ounces are lighter than troy ounces. Complicated? You
> >>> bet. Troy weights are most usually used for gold and silver,
> >>> avoirdupois for most everything else.
>
> >>> Thus the old riddle, "Which weighs more, a pound of feathers or a
> >>> pound of gold?" The clear answer is a pound of feathers, weighed in
> >>> avoirdupois (453.6 gm), while a pound of gold is 373.2 gm.
>
> >>>> 1 stone = 14 pounds
> >>>> 1 hundredweight = 112 pounds
> >>>> 1 ton = 2240 pounds
>
> >>> That's a "long ton" or English equivalent to a metric tonne of 1000
> >>> kg. The usual Imperial ton is 2,000 pounds, I think.
> >> =================================================
> >> Back-arsewards... the Imperial ton is 20 cwt = 2240 lbs, the unusual
> >> American
> >> short ton is 2000 lbs. Not many years ago a British billion was a
> >> million million, not the thousand million that it has since become.
>
> > So there are three ways of looking at tons:
>
> > Imperial 2240 lb (1016 kg, I should have checked)
> > Metric 1000 kg
> > USA/Canada 2000 lb (907 kg)
>
> ===============================================
> I suspect the little red schoolhouses of the colonial backwoods
> confused the hundredweight (cwt) with a 100 lbs and by multiplying
> that by 20 arrived at the short ton.
> The tun is a large barrel, of course.
> http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1005/1428697981_1cfdd49674.jpg
> http://www.picturesofengland.com/img/L/1020188.jpg
>
> An imperial gallon of water weighs 10 lb, an American short gallon
> weighs ~ 8.33-8.35 lb. Thus American cars get fewer mpg.
>
> US liquid gallons
> 1 MPG ~ 0.425 km/l
> 235/MPG ~ l/100 km
> 1 MPG ~ 1.201 MPG (Imp)
> Imperial gallons (UK)
> 1 MPG ~ 0.354 km/l
> 282/MPG ~ l/100 km
> 1 MPG ~ 0.833 MPG (US)
> What is extremely unlikely is the Americans changing the mile,
> their roads are laid out in a 1 mile grid all over the Great Plains
> as you can see using Google Earth.
> The word "mile" comes from the Latin "mille" and was a thousand
> paces by marching Roman troops.
>

That's 1.6 meters per step? Quite impressive!
=====================================
Ref: http://hkacc203.org/_notes/Pace%20Stick%20Training%20Note.pdf
"With the pace stick open to 750mm (30 inches) stand to Attention as
normal."

A pace is two steps, one for each leg, and even short me can step
2.5 feet, or pace 5 feet, 5000 feet to a mile. Quite unimpressive given
5280 feet to the mile... unless you are a dwarf.



From: Androcles on

"Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr." <ostap_bender_1900(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:0d4ee18a-d51d-4367-9970-c2664f1f15cd(a)k6g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 8, 6:03 am, Andrew Usher <k_over_hb...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Feb 8, 5:57 am, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_u> wrote:
>
> > ===============================================
> > I suspect the little red schoolhouses of the colonial backwoods
> > confused the hundredweight (cwt) with a 100 lbs and by multiplying
> > that by 20 arrived at the short ton.
> > The tun is a large barrel, of course.
> > http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1005/1428697981_1cfdd49674.jpg
> > http://www.picturesofengland.com/img/L/1020188.jpg
>
> In fact, a tun of water is about 2100 lb - in between the American and
> British values.
>

Yes, that's one of the beauties of the Imperial system: each term can
mean dozens of different things.
=========================================
Yes, that's ten of the beauties of the metric system: each term can mean
tens, hundreds, thousands or millions of different things. If the beauty of
Helen of Troy could launch a thousand ships then the amount of beauty needed
to launch just one ship must be the milliHelen.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/object
Date: 14th century
1 a : something material that may be perceived by the senses <I see an
object in the distance> b : something that when viewed stirs a particular
emotion (as pity) <look to the tragic loading of this bed.the object poisons
sight; let it be hid - Shakespeare>
2 a : something mental or physical toward which thought, feeling, or action
is directed <an object for study> <the object of my affection> <delicately
carved art objects> b : something physical that is perceived by an
individual and becomes an agent for psychological identification <the mother
is the primary object of the child>
3 a : the goal or end of an effort or activity : purpose, objective <their
object is to investigate the matter thoroughly> b : a cause for attention or
concern <money is no object>
4 : a thing that forms an element of or constitutes the subject matter of an
investigation or science
5 a : a noun or noun equivalent (as a pronoun, gerund, or clause) denoting
the goal or result of the action of a verb b : a noun or noun equivalent in
a prepositional phrase
6 a : a data structure in object-oriented programming that can contain
functions as well as data, variables, and other data structures b : a
discrete entity (as a window or icon) in computer graphics that can be
manipulated independently of other such entities

synonyms see intention
Date: 15th century

transitive verb
: to put forth in opposition or as an objection <objected that the statement
was misleading>
intransitive verb
1 : to oppose something firmly and usually with words or arguments
2 : to feel distaste for something



That's one of the beauties of the English language: each term can mean
dozens of different things.