The official WWDC prediction / reaction thread
in [UK Mac]
|
From: Woody on 7 Jun 2010 16:46 Woody <usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk> wrote: > Pd <peterd.news(a)gmail.invalid> wrote: > > > - Folders! I trust that means what I think it means. > > No, it doesn't. > > Unless you mean something other than I think you think you mean, which > would be less likely. http://www.tuaw.com/2010/04/08/iphone-os-4-0-folders-help-organize-your- apps/ -- Woody Alienrat Design Ltd
From: zoara on 7 Jun 2010 17:21 Pd <peterd.news(a)gmail.invalid> wrote: > - Folders! I trust that means what I think it means. Not really. Folders, but not subfolders. I'm on Apple's side on this one but I reckon many won't be. -z- -- "And the tiny universe compiles." http://powazek.com/posts/1655
From: Ian McCall on 7 Jun 2010 17:23 On 2010-06-07 22:21:41 +0100, me18(a)privacy.net (zoara) said: > Pd <peterd.news(a)gmail.invalid> wrote: > >> - Folders! I trust that means what I think it means. > > Not really. Folders, but not subfolders. > > I'm on Apple's side on this one but I reckon many won't be. That will be me then. And why only nine apps? Meh. Cheers, Ian
From: Flavio Matani on 7 Jun 2010 17:37 zoara <me18(a)privacy.net> wrote: > Chris Ridd <chrisridd(a)mac.com> wrote: > > > On 2010-06-07 20:02:31 +0100, zoara said: > > > > > Jaimie Vandenbergh <jaimie(a)sometimes.sessile.org> wrote: > > > > > >> On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 19:35:31 +0100, Jaimie Vandenbergh > > >> <jaimie(a)sometimes.sessile.org> wrote: > > >> > > >>> On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 18:24:52 +0100, Jaimie Vandenbergh > > >>> <jaimie(a)sometimes.sessile.org> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 17:57:21 +0100, me18(a)privacy.net (zoara) wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> As long as they release an iPhone which is faster than the current one > > >>>>> and has more capacity, I'm in. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> If they release a white one, I'm in with bells on. > > >>>> > > >>>> I wanted a white one last time, so they're probably aluminium this > > >>>> year. Sigh. > > >>> > > >>> Close - steel. Nice kit, very industrial. And two glass sides to get > > >>> all fingerprinty... > > >> > > >> Aha! They're in white-back as well. Niiice. > > > > > > White-front as well, which is new. The home button looks weird. > > > > > > However, that's the one I'm getting. All very 2001-esque. Or Buck > > > Rogers, as the guys at work insist. > > > > I might dust off my old iPod and pretend it is an iPhone 4. > > Exactly. White plastic gadgets are the best. I beg to differ:P -- flavio matani guitar tuition http://www.flaviomatani.co.uk http://fflavio.com
From: Flavio Matani on 7 Jun 2010 17:45
Jaimie Vandenbergh <jaimie(a)sometimes.sessile.org> wrote: > > >I'm going to be liking the speed of the A4, though I didn't see any "x > >as fast" or anything - did they mention it? So long as it's noticeably > >faster than my 3G I'll be happy. > > From everyone who's touched an iPad, they are ridiculously fast. The > phone will be even faster, with fewer pixels to push and less > voluminous apps. But Jobs did say the new iPhone would have something like 76% of the pixel count on the iPad display, because of the nature of the new display, retinal whatsit. -- flavio matani guitar tuition http://www.flaviomatani.co.uk http://fflavio.com |