The proof of mass vector.
in [Math]
|
Prev: infinity ...
Next: The set of All sets
From: Ka-In Yen on 9 Mar 2007 20:04 On Mar 9, 9:50 am, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > You are an GENIUS. The equations you keep using as examples were > explicitly derived without such quantities in mind. Thank you for your comment, then I am the first one who derive it.
From: Androcles on 10 Mar 2007 00:07 "Ka-In Yen" <yenkain(a)yahoo.com.tw> wrote in message news:1173488182.891246.247390(a)c51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com... > On Mar 9, 6:11 pm, "Androcles" <Engin...(a)hogwarts.physics.co.uk> > wrote: >> "Ka-In Yen" <yenk...(a)yahoo.com.tw> wrote in messagenews:1173402746.622921.297240(a)8g2000cwh.googlegroups.com... >> > On Mar 8, 11:06 am, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Mar 7, 5:07 pm, "yen, ka-in" <yenk...(a)yahoo.com.tw> wrote: >> >> >> > On Mar 3, 9:25 am, "Androcles" <Engin...(a)hogwarts.physics.co.uk> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> > > "Ka-In Yen" <yenk...(a)yahoo.com.tw> wrote in messagenews:1172884002.101304.55620(a)z35g2000cwz.googlegroups.com... >> >> > > > Is it useful? >> >> >> > > > The proof of mass vector. >> >> >> > > The disproof: >> >> > > http://mathworld.wolfram.com/VectorSpace.html >> >> >> > > When you find negative mass you can call it a vector. >> >> > > Ergo, you are bonkers. >> >> >> > In 3D vector algebra of physics, linear mass density >> >> > and surface mass density are vector; shortly, I call >> >> > them mass vector. >> >> >> Prove it. You know, if what you say is true, it shouldn't be hard for >> >> you to demonstrate it to be true when you derive the wave equation >> >> > The proof of mass vector. >> > The proof of mass vector. >> > The proof of mass vector. >> > The proof of mass vector. >> >> > Introduction: >> > In this paper, we will prove that linear mass density and >> > surface mass density are vector, and the application of mass >> > vector is presented. >> >> > 1. The unit of vector. >> >> > In physics, The unit of three-dimensional cartesian coordinate >> > systems is meter. In this paper, a point of 3-D coordinate >> > system is written as >> >> > (p1,p2,p3) m, or (p:3) m >> >> > and a vector is written as >> >> > <a,b,c> m, or <a:3> m >> >> > or >> >> > l m<i,j,k> = <a,b,c> m >> >> > where l=abs(sqrt(a^2+b^2+c^2)) is the magnitude of the vector, >> > and <i,j,k> is a unit vector which gives the direction of >> > the vector. >> >> Err... >> I'm not sure what direction you think mass will take. >> >> http://mathworld.wolfram.com/VectorSpace.html >> 4. Existence of additive inverse: For any X, there exists a -X such that >> >> X+ (-X) = 0 >> >> Since the scalar always positive, given by >> "l=abs(sqrt(a^2+b^2+c^2)) is the magnitude of the vector" (a scalar). >> >> There is no such animal as negative mass. Ergo mass is not a vector. >> Proof failed. > > In 3D vector algebra of physics, velocity is a vector. > > <velocity> = <length> / time. Correct. Length is a vector, hence time is a scalar. Let us double length and leave time unaltered. We have doubled velocity. Length is a vector, time is a scalar. 7. Distributivity of vector sums: p(x+y) = px + py If time were a vector it would be impossible to double velocity. > > Linear mass density is a vector too, Wrong. There is no such animal as negative mass. Ergo mass is not a vector. Proof failed. You are dead in the water on definition, son.
From: Ka-In Yen on 11 Mar 2007 20:38 On Mar 10, 1:07 pm, "Androcles" <Engin...(a)hogwarts.physics.co.uk> wrote: > Length is a vector, time is a scalar. Goose said "LENGTH IS NOT A VECTOR."
From: Ka-In Yen on 12 Mar 2007 20:30 On Mar 12, 9:31 am, "Androcles" <Engin...(a)hogwarts.physics.co.uk> wrote: > "Ka-In Yen" <yenk...(a)yahoo.com.tw> wrote in messagenews:1173659938.685124.318260(a)c51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com... > > On Mar 10, 1:07 pm, "Androcles" <Engin...(a)hogwarts.physics.co.uk> > > wrote: > >> Length is a vector, time is a scalar. > > > Goose said "LENGTH IS NOT A VECTOR." > > He's right, it's a scalar. See how easy it is to slip up? Even I goofed on that. Goose and you are ill-trained in 3D vector algebra.
From: Autymn D. C. on 13 Mar 2007 18:45
On Mar 4, 1:35 pm, "Pmb" <som...(a)somewhere.net> wrote: > "Uncle Al" <Uncle...(a)hate.spam.net> wrote in message > > news:45EB22D4.47C79CA7(a)hate.spam.net... > > > Ka-In Yen wrote: > > >> On Mar 3, 9:58 am, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Did you finish your homework? > > >> Home work for Eric Gisse: > >> A rectangle sits in 3D space. The area vector of the rectangle is A, > >> and the legth vector of one side of the rectangle is L. Please find > >> the length vector of the other side of the rectangle? > > > "Area vector"? Is that like a position vector or the number of > > testiclettes in your nutsack vector? OK,Uncle Alis intrigued. Give > > some examples of scalars. > > I don't see where they got that notion of area vector. As I know it the > "Area Vector" is a vector whose direction is normal to a surface element and > whose magnitude is the area of the surface element. I guess you can extend > this to finite areas which would then make the above comment meaningful, but > not something which is readily solveable due to lack of information. These vectors are of plots' orientations. One can keep off the jackals' radar by stickan "field" between the property and vector. |