Prev: infinity ...
Next: The set of All sets
From: Phineas T Puddleduck on 6 May 2007 20:29 In article <1178497567.056084.212800(a)q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, Ka-In Yen <yenkain(a)yahoo.com.tw> wrote: > On May 6, 9:17 am, Phineas T Puddleduck <phineaspuddled...(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > In article <1178412906.381285.115...(a)u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>, > > Ka-In Yen <yenk...(a)yahoo.com.tw> wrote: > > > > > Mathematically, I proved that Einstein was > > > ill-trained in 3D vector algebra; STR was based > > > on incomplete physical mathematics. Logically, > > > STR is totally nonsense. > > > > You have only proved that you are an idiot. > > Go play your video game; NG is for college students who > study very hard. What an amazing retort. I am less then a few weeks away from completing my Masters. You? -- Sacred keeper of the Hollow Sphere, and the space within the Coffee Boy singularity. COOSN-174-07-82116: alt.astronomy's favourite poster (from a survey taken of the saucerhead high command).
From: T Wake on 7 May 2007 11:37 "Ka-In Yen" <yenkain(a)yahoo.com.tw> wrote in message news:1178412906.381285.115270(a)u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com... > Mathematically, I proved that Einstein was > ill-trained in 3D vector algebra; STR was based > on incomplete physical mathematics. Logically, > STR is totally nonsense. Blimey.
From: T Wake on 7 May 2007 11:38 "Ka-In Yen" <yenkain(a)yahoo.com.tw> wrote in message news:1178497567.056084.212800(a)q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com... > On May 6, 9:17 am, Phineas T Puddleduck <phineaspuddled...(a)gmail.com> > wrote: >> In article <1178412906.381285.115...(a)u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>, >> Ka-In Yen <yenk...(a)yahoo.com.tw> wrote: >> >> > Mathematically, I proved that Einstein was >> > ill-trained in 3D vector algebra; STR was based >> > on incomplete physical mathematics. Logically, >> > STR is totally nonsense. >> >> You have only proved that you are an idiot. > > Go play your video game; NG is for college students who > study very hard. Counts you out then.
From: Ka-In Yen on 8 May 2007 20:42 On Apr 26, 6:43 pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 25, 4:17 pm, Ka-In Yen <yenk...(a)yahoo.com.tw> wrote: > > > Ka-In Yen wrote: > > > > > Dear Bob Kolker, > > > > > Thank you for your comment. Pressure(p) is a scalar. > > > > Force and area are vectors. > > > > Force can be represented by a vector. That is because forces have both > > > megnitude and direction. Area cannot. Area is a measure. What is the > > > direction of an area? > > > Let's check this equation Pressure = Force / Area. > > If force is a vector and area is a scalar, then > > pressure is a vector. This is a disaster of physical > > mathematics. > > The only disaster is your freshman-level physics understanding. Quit > trying to pull vectorial information from equations that are only > valid in one dimension Force is a 3D vector.
From: Ka-In Yen on 8 May 2007 20:45
On Apr 28, 9:00 am, Ka-In Yen <yenk...(a)yahoo.com.tw> wrote: > On Apr 26, 6:43 pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Finish your homework, or I will call your mami. Home work for Eric Gisse: A rectangle sits in 3D space. The area vector of the rectangle is A, and the legth vector of one side of the rectangle is L. Please find the length vector of the other side of the rectangle? Dear Puddleduck, Can you help Goose to finish his homework? |