There is no "pull" of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Was Einstein Guilty of Scientific Fraud?
Next: Question about energy eigenvalues of a Hamiltonian, in general
From: PD on 22 Apr 2010 17:01 On Apr 22, 3:38 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Apr 22, 4:27 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear Dunce: "Orbits" aren't physical constructs! NE What? The orbit of the Earth around the Sun isn't physical, John? Or when you say "physical constructs" are you thinking man-made structures, like sheds and sports arenas? > > > > > On Apr 22, 3:03 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > On Apr 21, 4:26 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Bucky Fuller explained that nature > > > doesn't think pi is 3.1416... He was right, but I don't HATE curves > > > because of the fractions everywhere. NE > > > You didn't answer my questions below. Where in the orbit of the earth > > does it navigate a sudden corner from one straight line segment to > > another? > > > Either answer the question, John, or retract your earlier statement, > > which was clearly foolish. > > > > > On Apr 21, 2:28 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > On Apr 20, 5:17 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Dear spudnik: While I was a student at Clemson, I attended two > > > > > lectures (in different years) of Robert B. Fuller. He was a 'head-in- > > > > > the-clouds' guy. But I learned that "nature" doesn't construct things > > > > > with curves. The reason pi is an infinitely repeating decimal is > > > > > because circles are actually (in nature) constructed of short straight- > > > > > line segments rather than curves. And the number of segments will > > > > > always a whole number. NoEinstein > > > > > Oh my. > > > > So in your mind, rational numbers and irrational numbers do not > > > > correspond to anything in reality. Only integers. > > > > So, where on a water droplet falling from the sky, are these straight- > > > > line segments? > > > > And when the Earth orbits the sun, how often does it make a quick turn > > > > at a corner between two straight-line segments? And what kicks the > > > > Earth from one segment to the next? > > > > > You know you've lost your mind, right? > > > > > PD- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > >
From: Raymond Yohros on 22 Apr 2010 18:31 On Apr 22, 4:01 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 22, 3:38 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Apr 22, 4:27 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Dear Dunce: "Orbits" aren't physical constructs! NE > > What? The orbit of the Earth around the Sun isn't physical, John? > > Or when you say "physical constructs" are you thinking man-made > structures, like sheds and sports arenas? > the funniest thing about this conversation is the topics title! r.y
From: mpc755 on 22 Apr 2010 18:39 On Apr 22, 6:31 pm, Raymond Yohros <b...(a)birdband.net> wrote: > On Apr 22, 4:01 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Apr 22, 3:38 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > On Apr 22, 4:27 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Dear Dunce: "Orbits" aren't physical constructs! NE > > > What? The orbit of the Earth around the Sun isn't physical, John? > > > Or when you say "physical constructs" are you thinking man-made > > structures, like sheds and sports arenas? > > the funniest thing about this conversation is the > topics title! > > r.y Aether and matter are different states of the same material. Aether is displaced by matter. Displacements creates pressure. Gravity is pressure exerted by aether displaced by matter. Aether is displaced based on mass per volume. The more massive an object is per volume the less aether it contains, the more aether is displaced. The more aether displaced the greater the pressure exerted by the aether displaced by the matter. The 'push' in the title is the pressure exerted by the aether towards the matter. Gravity is the pressure exerted by the aether towards the matter.
From: PD on 23 Apr 2010 17:06 On Apr 23, 3:53 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 23, 2:01 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 23, 12:57 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Apr 23, 1:45 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 23, 12:24 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Apr 23, 12:01 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 22, 10:32 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Dear mpc755: I read that delightful little book in which A. A. > > > > > > Michelson wrote the quote you cite. My "varying ether flow and > > > > > > density" is the unifying discovery in all of nature. Michelson would > > > > > > be thrilled that I found out why his experiment didn't work (no > > > > > > control), and thrilled that I have found the grand unification > > > > > > mechanism for all of nature. The latter is varying pressure and > > > > > > velocity, much like in weather systems on Earth. But the ether ISN'T > > > > > > displaced by matter! Ether flows THROUGH matter, only to be slowed by > > > > > > the nuclei, in proportion to the mass. When you can realize that > > > > > > fact, you and I will be on the same track. NoEinstein > > > > > > In the quote Michelson discuss aether displacement, "an aether > > > > > displacement to the electric current". This is conceptually the same > > > > > as Maxwell's displacement current. > > > > > Actually, no. Displacement current and aether displacement have > > > > absolutely nothing to do with each other. Please return to the > > > > starting line and try again. > > > > You must have missed this post: > > > You must have missed the point of my statement, which is that > > *Maxwell's* displacement current, which has nothing to do with > > anything that de Broglie ever did, also has nothing to do with aether > > displacement. So you are either wrong, or a bald-faced liar. Which is > > it? > > You must have missed this post: Well I could have guessed this was your strategy. You feel free to make any half-assed statement you feel like making, and when you get a response -- any response at all -- that is your opportunity to drop in your cut-and-paste book-in-progress, whether it is relevant to the response or not. This is a combination of trolling and spamming, and you, sir, are an abomination for being so shameless about it. Nothing here that is worth more than mockery.
From: Raymond Yohros on 22 Apr 2010 18:48
On Apr 22, 5:39 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 22, 6:31 pm, Raymond Yohros wrote: > > the funniest thing about this conversation is the > > topics title! > > > Aether and matter are different states of the same material. > Aether is displaced by matter. > Displacements creates pressure. > Gravity is pressure exerted by aether displaced by matter. > > Aether is displaced based on mass per volume. The more massive an > object is per volume the less aether it contains, the more aether is > displaced. The more aether displaced the greater the pressure exerted > by the aether displaced by the matter. > > The 'push' in the title is the pressure exerted by the aether towards > the matter. > > Gravity is the pressure exerted by the aether towards the matter. > i think i could understand better what you say without that aether word. im sorry. i just dont buy it! r.y |