There is no “pull” of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!
in [Physics]
|
From: Igor on 12 Feb 2010 21:23 On Feb 12, 4:08 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Feb 11, 2:57 pm, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > > Dear Igor: Please give a list of LINKS to your '+new posts'. Readers > will then know that YOU are the one who's easy to push over! Ha, ha, > HA! NoEinstein > You still don't get it. Maybe you need to go back and read my post again. Ever heard of torque? And maybe you need to stop top posting so posterity can understand just who is responding to whom.
From: Igor on 12 Feb 2010 21:30 On Feb 12, 4:08 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Feb 11, 2:57 pm, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > > Dear Igor: Please give a list of LINKS to your '+new posts'. Readers > will then know that YOU are the one who's easy to push over! Ha, ha, > HA! NoEinstein > You won't find any of my new ideas posted on usenet. This medium has, unfortunately, become the home of purveyors of psycho-ceramics, much like yourself. If you had any sense at all, you'd stop posting your ignorant nonsense and pick up a real physics textbook.
From: NoEinstein on 15 Feb 2010 19:13 On Feb 12, 4:17 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > No, PD! Gamma rays are PROTONS. Those are much denser 'tangles' of IOTAs which is the same... 'stuff' that photons (and everything else in the Universe) is made of. NoEinstein > > On Feb 12, 2:54 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Feb 11, 1:24 am, john <vega...(a)accesscomm.ca> wrote: > > > Dear John: Particles DON'T produce unlimited radiation unless the > > lost ether gets replenished! > > Something must be producing all this aether to push with, no? > > > Gamma rays, which have mass, must emit > > photons. > > Oh, John, John, John. Gamma rays ARE photons.http://www.epa.gov/rpdweb00/understand/gamma.html > > > > > But the number of photons is quite small, since the mass is > > quite small. Gamma rays replenish their lost photons by banging into > > the ether as they travel. Since the tangential velocity of the IOTAs > > (smallest energy units of the ether) is 'c', then the gamma rays can > > keep right on traveling at velocity 'c' for a very long time. > > NoEinstein > > > > On Feb 10, 7:13 pm, "n...(a)bid.nes" <alien8...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Feb 10, 3:59 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > Yesterday, I happened to tune-in for the last half of a TV program > > > > > about the Moon. Time and again, the supposed technical experts who > > > > > were being interviewed referred to the pull of gravity between the > > > > > Earth and the Moon. The effect of that pull was discussed as > > > > > relates to such things as ocean tides > > > > > Please explain ocean tides with push gravity > > > > First explain how every particle of the universe > > > can produce unlimited radiations which travel outward from > > > said particles while all the while providing inward impetus > > > to anything with which they interact. > > > Don't you think that's stretching it just a tad? > > > ('Course since then there's DM, DE, so really, > > > suck gravity is hardly outrageous at all compared > > > to 'intellectuallizing' a whole new class of matter, > > > sight unseen )('Course, if it's invisible, well, it's > > > invisible- but we prove it's there by pointing to > > > the movements of stars that occasioned its creation > > > in the first place.So it's real yin/yangy, y'know.) > > > > But the tide thing- really, everything at this scale- > > > works exactly the same for push as for pull. > > > Just at larger sizes, where planets > > > are able to completely shadow push from the other side, > > > surface gravity will tend towards a limit- therefore ruling out > > > the whole black hole paradox. > > > > john- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
From: NoEinstein on 15 Feb 2010 19:59 On Feb 12, 8:33 pm, "n...(a)bid.nes" <alien8...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Mark: You are among the smarter people visiting sci.physics. The 'tidal issue' of there being high tides on opposite sides of the Earth must surely be caused by the east to west blockage of tidal flow due to the mainly north to south placement of the continents. In other words, the tides are restricted from flowing uniformly around the globe, east to west. The errant notion that the gravity of the moon PULLS the tides doesn't explain the observed opposing tides, either. My new science is like clearing a path through a dense wilderness. Tidal particulars are like picking up the branches littering the way. I'll leave the latter to the oceanographers. NoEinstein > > On Feb 12, 1:17 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Feb 11, 11:24 pm, "n...(a)bid.nes" <alien8...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Dear Mark: My original post wasn't intended to be 'just' about > > tides. > > It's obvious that push gravity can explain the immediate sublunar > tide easily; the ocean shadowed by the moon from the incoming aether > is free to expand under the lateral pressure of the rest of the ocean > which *is* subject to the pressure of the incoming aether. > > But the tide has *two* lobes; one directly under the moon and one at > the antipodal point. > > Please explain these diagrams using push gravity: > > http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/images/tides.jpg > > Specifically, please explain the rising water on the side of the > planet *away from* the Sun and Moon. Note the height of the rise on > both sides of the planet is about equal. Ordinary "pull" gravity > explains this effect nicely along with many other observed effects. > > After you've done this we can discuss orbits. > > Mark L. Fergerson
From: NoEinstein on 15 Feb 2010 20:05
On Feb 12, 9:30 pm, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > On Feb 12, 4:08 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Feb 11, 2:57 pm, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > > > Dear Igor: Please give a list of LINKS to your '+new posts'. Readers > > will then know that YOU are the one who's easy to push over! Ha, ha, > > HA! NoEinstein > > You won't find any of my new ideas posted on usenet. This medium has, > unfortunately, become the home of purveyors of psycho-ceramics, much > like yourself. If you had any sense at all, you'd stop posting your > ignorant nonsense and pick up a real physics textbook. Dear IGOR: Reading a textbook is like admitting that the reader doesn't know. When the explanations being given in physics started defying logic and reason, I stopped reading and started thinking for myself. If this forum isn't good enough for you, why do you keep showing up? Can't you find enough people to disparage on those other sites? NoEinstein |