Thieving pasties
in [UK Mac]
|
From: Rowland McDonnell on 29 Jun 2010 16:43 James Jolley <jrjolley(a)me.com> wrote: > real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid (Rowland McDonnell) said: > > > Justin C <justin.0911(a)purestblue.com> wrote: > > > >> Got fed up waiting ages to be served in Gregg's today so I pushed past > >> the queue and while the staff were serving at the other end of the > >> counter I helped myself to two baked meat savouries and walked out the > >> back. Nary a word was said. > > > > Yeah, but admitting to the crime of theft in fashion that places your > > admission in a permanent public record is not the most bright of ideas, > > izzit? > > > > Rowland. > > (who suspects no-one's really bothered, but...) > > You suspect right, no one really is. He's only contributing a bit of > fun. It's not something i'd do myself though, whizzing cakes and > pasties but oh well, each to there own. `Just having a bit of fun' - strange attitude towards the crime of theft. Do you treat all the criminal law with the same degree of contempt? Rowland. -- Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell(a)dog.physics.org Sorry - the spam got to me http://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking
From: James Jolley on 29 Jun 2010 17:17 On 2010-06-29 21:43:39 +0100, real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid (Rowland McDonnell) said: > James Jolley <jrjolley(a)me.com> wrote: > >> real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid (Rowland McDonnell) said: >> >>> Justin C <justin.0911(a)purestblue.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Got fed up waiting ages to be served in Gregg's today so I pushed past >>>> the queue and while the staff were serving at the other end of the >>>> counter I helped myself to two baked meat savouries and walked out the >>>> back. Nary a word was said. >>> >>> Yeah, but admitting to the crime of theft in fashion that places your >>> admission in a permanent public record is not the most bright of ideas, >>> izzit? >>> >>> Rowland. >>> (who suspects no-one's really bothered, but...) >> >> You suspect right, no one really is. He's only contributing a bit of >> fun. It's not something i'd do myself though, whizzing cakes and >> pasties but oh well, each to there own. > > `Just having a bit of fun' - strange attitude towards the crime of > theft. Do you treat all the criminal law with the same degree of > contempt? > > Rowland. Naturally not, having been robbed once in my old house I don't. Now who's making judgements? Oh yes - it's fine to do this to you because you play at being sick when it suits you.
From: Paul Womar on 29 Jun 2010 17:31 Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote: > James Jolley <jrjolley(a)me.com> wrote: > > You suspect right, no one really is. He's only contributing a bit of > > fun. It's not something i'd do myself though, whizzing cakes and > > pasties but oh well, each to there own. > > `Just having a bit of fun' - strange attitude towards the crime of > theft. Do you treat all the criminal law with the same degree of > contempt? Am I missing out some double-bluff on the joke or have you just not wondered why this was posted here and the similarity to other thread subjects? [That's not to past judgement on whether this is actually a particularly funny joke or not!] -- -> The email address used in this message *IS* valid <-
From: James Jolley on 29 Jun 2010 17:35 On 2010-06-29 22:31:35 +0100, {$PW$}@womar.co.uk (Paul Womar) said: > Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote: > >> James Jolley <jrjolley(a)me.com> wrote: > >>> You suspect right, no one really is. He's only contributing a bit of >>> fun. It's not something i'd do myself though, whizzing cakes and >>> pasties but oh well, each to there own. >> >> `Just having a bit of fun' - strange attitude towards the crime of >> theft. Do you treat all the criminal law with the same degree of >> contempt? > > Am I missing out some double-bluff on the joke or have you just not > wondered why this was posted here and the similarity to other thread > subjects? Yes, that's why I said that it's sounded like a fun idea, robbing them. As usual though, McFucktard had to turn it in to his own personal worship thread. > > [That's not to past judgement on whether this is actually a particularly > funny joke or not!] It'de be even more funny if I actually did it. Arresting a blind man for feeling his way around the counter? Now that seems interesting. ROWLAND I AM JOKING BY THE WAY
From: Rowland McDonnell on 29 Jun 2010 23:39
Paul Womar <{$PW$}@womar.co.uk> wrote: > Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote: > > > James Jolley <jrjolley(a)me.com> wrote: > > > > You suspect right, no one really is. He's only contributing a bit of > > > fun. It's not something i'd do myself though, whizzing cakes and > > > pasties but oh well, each to there own. > > > > `Just having a bit of fun' - strange attitude towards the crime of > > theft. Do you treat all the criminal law with the same degree of > > contempt? > > Am I missing out some double-bluff on the joke or have you just not > wondered why this was posted here and the similarity to other thread > subjects? > > [That's not to past judgement on whether this is actually a particularly > funny joke or not!] You're not making any sense - but I have had an email which does make sense. Rowland. P.S. Hint: smileys are a good idea if you're going to make a joke. Not always essential, but if you miss out a smiley and someone fails to notice that it was meant as humour, the decent polite thing to do is point out that it was a joke to the person who didn't get it. You, Paul, chose not to behave in that decent way. I wonder why? -- Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell(a)dog.physics.org Sorry - the spam got to me http://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking |