Thieving pasties
in [UK Mac]
|
From: James Jolley on 30 Jun 2010 06:23 On 2010-06-30 04:39:18 +0100, real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid (Rowland McDonnell) said: > Paul Womar <{$PW$}@womar.co.uk> wrote: > >> Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote: >> >>> James Jolley <jrjolley(a)me.com> wrote: >> >>>> You suspect right, no one really is. He's only contributing a bit of >>>> fun. It's not something i'd do myself though, whizzing cakes and >>>> pasties but oh well, each to there own. >>> >>> `Just having a bit of fun' - strange attitude towards the crime of >>> theft. Do you treat all the criminal law with the same degree of >>> contempt? >> >> Am I missing out some double-bluff on the joke or have you just not >> wondered why this was posted here and the similarity to other thread >> subjects? >> >> [That's not to past judgement on whether this is actually a particularly >> funny joke or not!] > > You're not making any sense - but I have had an email which does make > sense. > > Rowland. > > P.S. Hint: smileys are a good idea if you're going to make a joke. Not > always essential, but if you miss out a smiley and someone fails to > notice that it was meant as humour, the decent polite thing to do is > point out that it was a joke to the person who didn't get it. > > You, Paul, chose not to behave in that decent way. I wonder why? Another person you have had a go at. When will it stop? NEver? Oh course it won't because you're little clique of fans will all jump in soon telling us how much we're being unfair to baby McTitArse
From: Ben Shimmin on 30 Jun 2010 06:30 James Jolley <jrjolley(a)me.com>: [...] > Another person you have had a go at. When will it stop? NEver? Oh > course it won't because you're little clique of fans will all jump in > soon telling us how much we're being unfair to baby McTitArse I'm sorry, James, but your contributions to this newsgroup (the last five I've read, anyway) are every bit as worthless as his. Please don't distract yourself from your important mission of putting the world to rights by replying to this message -- it won't be read. b. -- <bas(a)bas.me.uk> <URL:http://bas.me.uk/> `Zombies are defined by behavior and can be "explained" by many handy shortcuts: the supernatural, radiation, a virus, space visitors, secret weapons, a Harvard education and so on.' -- Roger Ebert
From: James Jolley on 30 Jun 2010 06:33 On 2010-06-30 11:30:29 +0100, Ben Shimmin <bas(a)llamaselector.com> said: > James Jolley <jrjolley(a)me.com>: > > [...] > >> Another person you have had a go at. When will it stop? NEver? Oh >> course it won't because you're little clique of fans will all jump in >> soon telling us how much we're being unfair to baby McTitArse > > I'm sorry, James, but your contributions to this newsgroup (the last > five I've read, anyway) are every bit as worthless as his. Shows me what you all think then. That's why I haven't even bothered posting about iOS 4 and the improved access. I am scared to because he will jump in on it and start accusing me of things. > > Please don't distract yourself from your important mission of putting > the world to rights by replying to this message -- it won't be read. Why am I not surprised?
From: Chris Ridd on 30 Jun 2010 06:41 On 2010-06-30 11:33:18 +0100, James Jolley said: > On 2010-06-30 11:30:29 +0100, Ben Shimmin <bas(a)llamaselector.com> said: > >> James Jolley <jrjolley(a)me.com>: >> >> [...] >> >>> Another person you have had a go at. When will it stop? NEver? Oh >>> course it won't because you're little clique of fans will all jump in >>> soon telling us how much we're being unfair to baby McTitArse >> >> I'm sorry, James, but your contributions to this newsgroup (the last >> five I've read, anyway) are every bit as worthless as his. > > Shows me what you all think then. That's why I haven't even bothered > posting about iOS 4 and the improved access. I am scared to because he > will jump in on it and start accusing me of things. I think Ben's particularly talking about the threads where you and Rowland argue. He's right - they are spectacularly worthless. You're making things worse - please killfile Rowland and get on with life! I'm interested in your observations (er, no pun intended) on iOS 4. -- Chris
From: James Jolley on 30 Jun 2010 06:46
On 2010-06-30 11:41:53 +0100, Chris Ridd <chrisridd(a)mac.com> said: > > I think Ben's particularly talking about the threads where you and > Rowland argue. He's right - they are spectacularly worthless. You're > making things worse - please killfile Rowland and get on with life! So it's me that makes things worse then? Don't any of you see how he is using blindness as an excuse to throw digs in at every turn? "Do you think because you are blind....." that kind of thing? > > I'm interested in your observations (er, no pun intended) on iOS 4. I'd be interested in writing them, but McDonal will start on me and the rest of you will stand back and allow him. I think I won't bother thanks. Any further accessibility input you can find in the documentation. I've nothing more to contribute here. |